EPThttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4429
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45854 Posts
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9206 Posts
On July 25 2016 07:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Third rape/ sexual assault allegation made against Donald Trump. Sigh. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html That article is incredibly biased, the writer calls it 'rape culture' that people don't assume he's guilty until proven innocent. That's some Breitbart tier trash, just in the opposite direction. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23932 Posts
On July 25 2016 07:28 biology]major wrote: Why on earth woud DWS speak at the convention tomorrow? Are they purposefully trying to outrage the Bernie supporters? Like was said, she officially moved her to staff (as if she wasn't working for her since she campaigned in 08). Hillary obviously thinks DWS is both a good Democrat and someone she should pay. But we're all crazy because we don't support that. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
On July 25 2016 07:28 biology]major wrote: Why on earth woud DWS speak at the convention tomorrow? Are they purposefully trying to outrage the Bernie supporters? I'm not seeing that on the schedule | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
On July 25 2016 07:31 GreenHorizons wrote: Like was said, she officially moved her to staff (as if she wasn't working for her since she campaigned in 08). Hillary obviously thinks DWS is both a good Democrat and someone she should pay. But we're all crazy because we don't support that. lmao what an idiotic response, hire the person who conspired against the candidate with a massive following. What was even the point of her resignation then? It clearly isn't because she could not do her job and be impartial and thus unqualified to be the Chair of the DNC, but rather because she doesn't want to take the spotlight away from Clinton. I'm going to get my popcorn ready for this convention. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 25 2016 07:56 cLutZ wrote: I cannot believe CNN and other networks are allowing this "Putin is conspiring against the Hillary campaign", which is basically a Ted Cruz's father killed JFK-level conspiracy theory on the air. Not only that, they have multiple "pundits" espousing the plausibility of this theory. Just wait and see how unhinged they'll be in a couple months. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14113 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22345 Posts
On July 25 2016 08:00 Sermokala wrote: I mean for anyone that had even given them a reasonable doubt hireing her after she resigned from her post just confirms that she was working for hillary from the start. Even as someone who assumed she was working with Hillary its stupid to make to so blatant by immediately hiring her. At the very least I would have waited until after the convention if you, for some reason, really want to hire her. | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On July 25 2016 06:54 scott31337 wrote: ![[image loading]](http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2016/07/HILLARY-EMAIL.jpg) Hillary just added DWS to her campaign - Awesome! What a fucking awful move. Makes Clinton look just terrible. I really can't think of many politicians that have as bad as a rap universally as DWS, and to not distance herself at all is simply poor judgment. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10142 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On July 25 2016 08:14 xDaunt wrote: I'm trying to figure out what Hillary's political calculus on this DWS thing is. Either she thinks she can get away with it or she truly doesn't give a fuck about the progressive wing of the party and thinks that she can win without it. It seriously blows my fucking mind. I cannot for the life of me think of any possible explanation for this. Can we get one of those diehard Clinton apologists in here to rationalize this please? Where's oneofthem? | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10142 Posts
On July 25 2016 08:16 Stratos_speAr wrote: It seriously blows my fucking mind. I cannot for the life of me think of any possible explanation for this. Can we get one of those diehard Clinton apologists in here to rationalize this please? Where's oneofthem? Banned. | ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 25 2016 08:00 ticklishmusic wrote: wasnt there proof that the DNC hackers were russian? I know that a lot of Trump's investors are Russian, his son admitted that to the Post a while ago. I don't know about the other stuff, but he does have a lot of financial ties to Russia and he is "self funding" his campaign through the Trump organization. I don't think there is any smoking gun, but it is something to talk about. On July 25 2016 08:14 xDaunt wrote: I'm trying to figure out what Hillary's political calculus on this DWS thing is. Either she thinks she can get away with it or she truly doesn't give a fuck about the progressive wing of the party and thinks that she can win without it. I always question if the progressive wing of the DNC is that big or just really good at making a lot of noise. The main problem for them has always been that they are made up of young voters who often do not turn out on Election day. | ||
| ||
