|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On July 20 2016 02:26 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 02:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
But Conventions are for Independent voters not already die hard supporters. Never mind the fact that Roll Call was a debacle showing that the GOP unity is also a farce. The people who are even remotely inclined to consider supporting Drumpf aren't really going to care about what happens at the conventions. There are so many other obvious, overriding considerations, that the overblown focus on Melania's speech is little more than a tempest in a teapot.This isn't the kind of thing that moves the needle, particularly when people already accept and acknowledge that Drumpf's campaign is an ongoing trainwreck. His campaign can make any number of additional, similar errors, and still win in November.
Which is a pretty big indictment for M'urica today mind you.
|
On July 20 2016 02:27 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 02:26 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2016 02:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
But Conventions are for Independent voters not already die hard supporters. Never mind the fact that Roll Call was a debacle showing that the GOP unity is also a farce. The people who are even remotely inclined to consider supporting Drumpf aren't really going to care about what happens at the conventions. There are so many other obvious, overriding considerations, that the overblown focus on Melania's speech is little more than a tempest in a teapot.This isn't the kind of thing that moves the needle, particularly when people already accept and acknowledge that Drumpf's campaign is an ongoing trainwreck. His campaign can make any number of additional, similar errors, and still win in November. Which is a pretty big indictment for M'urica today mind you.
Absolutely, but that's nothing new.
|
No republican has ever won the presidency without carrying Ohio.
The morning of the convention, trumps manager goes on national television and trashes the highly popular governor of Ohio (the same governor who destroyed trump in the Ohio primary), which also happens to be the state that is hosting the convention.
This is political malpractice.
|
On July 20 2016 02:29 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 02:27 Rebs wrote:On July 20 2016 02:26 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2016 02:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
But Conventions are for Independent voters not already die hard supporters. Never mind the fact that Roll Call was a debacle showing that the GOP unity is also a farce. The people who are even remotely inclined to consider supporting Drumpf aren't really going to care about what happens at the conventions. There are so many other obvious, overriding considerations, that the overblown focus on Melania's speech is little more than a tempest in a teapot.This isn't the kind of thing that moves the needle, particularly when people already accept and acknowledge that Drumpf's campaign is an ongoing trainwreck. His campaign can make any number of additional, similar errors, and still win in November. Which is a pretty big indictment for M'urica today mind you. Absolutely, but that's nothing new.
True, but everytime I feel like Im ready to accept it, it finds new ways to make me glad I left and moved to Canada. And believe me, when I did move, I did NOT want to move to Canada.
|
|
|
On July 20 2016 01:48 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 01:45 KwarK wrote:On July 20 2016 01:41 xDaunt wrote:
The response to Melania's speech is highly amusing. Y'all and the media are unhinged. Do you not believe she did it or not believe she did anything wrong? In all likelihood, someone did it. I'm just amused by the reaction. I'd say that it has an air of desperation to it, but none of you think that Trump can win, anyway.
-awkwardly raises hand-
|
The cop who used excessive force against the Indian old man got off. I'm really surprised by this one, looked unreasonable and unjustified and what baffles me is how the jury (made of ordinary people) didn't see that.
|
United States43468 Posts
If Michelle had included a 20 digit string of numbers in the middle of her speech and Ivanka had copied that exact string of numbers in the same order Sean Spicer would be there explaining how it didn't mean one was a copy of the other because he did a google search for the number 7 and it appears in countless other locations.
|
On July 20 2016 02:51 biology]major wrote:
The cop who used excessive force against the Indian old man got off. I'm really surprised by this one, looked unreasonable and unjustified and what baffles me is how the jury (made of ordinary people) didn't see that.
From other commentary, it was the DA that didn't really push the case in that one. Not sure how accurate that is.
On July 20 2016 02:48 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 01:48 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2016 01:45 KwarK wrote:On July 20 2016 01:41 xDaunt wrote:
The response to Melania's speech is highly amusing. Y'all and the media are unhinged. Do you not believe she did it or not believe she did anything wrong? In all likelihood, someone did it. I'm just amused by the reaction. I'd say that it has an air of desperation to it, but none of you think that Trump can win, anyway. -awkwardly raises hand-
I think xDaunt meant the democrats in the thread.
|
On July 20 2016 02:48 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 01:48 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2016 01:45 KwarK wrote:On July 20 2016 01:41 xDaunt wrote:
The response to Melania's speech is highly amusing. Y'all and the media are unhinged. Do you not believe she did it or not believe she did anything wrong? In all likelihood, someone did it. I'm just amused by the reaction. I'd say that it has an air of desperation to it, but none of you think that Trump can win, anyway. -awkwardly raises hand-
Not talking about you. =p Just those who are all over the Trump campaign for Melania's speech.
|
|
|
On July 20 2016 02:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
So you're saying there's a chance! 
Oh god. Surely this is fake, right? Can't even tell at this point...
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/qC2Se2n.jpg)
|
I can't tell reality from fiction anymore...truly, we are cursed to live in interesting times.
|
On July 20 2016 02:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:So you're saying there's a chance! Oh god. Surely this is fake, right? Can't even tell at this point...
Nope it is real. the tweet is right there on @realDonaldTrump
|
did obama actually have twitter in '08?
i dont think he did???
|
"Any publicity is good publicity" seems to be trump's motto at this point.
|
On July 20 2016 02:59 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 02:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:So you're saying there's a chance! Oh god. Surely this is fake, right? Can't even tell at this point... Nope it is real. the tweet is right there on @realDonaldTrump
I think the Obama one might be fake though? Maybe?
|
his twitter account is dated '07.
i still think its fake. theres no fukn way thats not a joke.
|
He joined Twitter in March of 2007.
|
why is it so hard to search for a specific tweet from 2008 ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
