US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3100
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
![]() Source If anyone has one of these for Republicans (that's better than the one FiveThirtyEight has, I'd be very glad if you posted it. | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:26 Ghanburighan wrote: Just a bit of context, what we're really looking at is whether each candidate still has a road to 50%+1 at the convention. Accounting for support so far, here's the Dem targets by Cook Political: + Show Spoiler + ![]() Source If anyone has one of these for Republicans (that's better than the one FiveThirtyEight has, I'd be very glad if you posted it. Why does Sanders have to get 73 more delegates than Clinton today? o_o | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:27 The_Templar wrote: Why does Sanders have to get 73 more delegates than Clinton today? o_o he's behind | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
The later states are more favorable to him and he's not that far behind. | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:28 The_Templar wrote: The later states are more favorable to him and he's not that far behind. he has fewer superfriends | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:28 The_Templar wrote: The later states are more favorable to him and he's not that far behind. She is going to take like 75% of the super delagates so he also has to make that up somewhere so even splitting the rest of the way is not good enough. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
| ||
Mohdoo
United States15687 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:33 xDaunt wrote: There's a fuckton of people at my republican caucus in Colorado. Who will you be voting for? | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:36 kwizach wrote: Arkansas called for Hillary as well. Currently 5-1. I think the bigger deal is that I dont think Sanders will get a single delagate from Arkansas based on those exit numbers. | ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
Vote Trump! ![]() | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:41 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: And Trump takes Virginia. All but over for Rubio. First of all, you follow Fox. Second, it's not clear yet. And Rubio outperformed his polls which is great news in a state which awards delegates proportionally. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15687 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:43 Ghanburighan wrote: First of all, you follow Fox. Second, it's not clear yet. And Rubio outperformed his polls which is great news in a state which awards delegates proportionally. He is behind 20% in his home state and Rick Scott is set to endorse Trump tonight. It's over. | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On March 02 2016 10:33 xDaunt wrote: There's a fuckton of people at my republican caucus in Colorado. So there are a ton of people at something that does not count? I respect that. | ||
| ||