| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On October 29 2015 10:03 TheTenthDoc wrote: Why does this current questioner talk soooooooo weird? It's getting under my skin. Think his job is to scream at a TV camera for a living. | ||
|
frazzle
United States468 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23250 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On October 29 2015 08:55 notesfromunderground wrote: Because they are not taught how to read books and think critically. I am a hard-core conservative when it comes to educational philosophy. There's only one way to get educated, and it involves starting with Plato, working forward, and then realizing that Plato was the wrong starting point. Just gonna hop back onto this discussion by quoting from a random point: STEM has a bad rap for being heavily about memorization and frameworks. While maybe at a few places that is true, I think it is a mischaracterization about the vast majority of programs. The problem is that you have to walk before you can run let alone fly, and the waking part requires quite a large body of knowledge before you can get started on anything meaningful. For example, while I can understand clinical oncology pretty well, it took years to get to the point-- I had to take intro bio, genetics, biochem, microbio (and the various pre-reqs for some of those classes) before I could get to my cancer bio class. Think of the beauty and logic in quantitative fields like physics, engineering and computer science-- think of how creative and how elegant solutions are to math problems that stand unsolved for hundreds of years, or the ingenuity it took to get a rocket into space. I can read about sort of how these things work and appreciate the human intellect for these things, but I can barely comprehend the mechanics and details of how all these things get done. Did your wonderful, eye-opening humanities education let you see how amazing and creative STEM can be? Or is ignorance (or something else) the cause of your blindness? PS. I probably read more books every year than you (if we want to measure dicks that way). | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On October 29 2015 10:05 GreenHorizons wrote: Jeb's answer literally made no sense. It made more sense than Christie's gibberish about pharmaceutical companies somehow being held criminally liable for "price gouging." But still not much sense. (also it's amazing that Fiorina actually has things exactly backwards with respect to pharmaceutical companies) | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23250 Posts
On October 29 2015 10:06 TheTenthDoc wrote: It made more sense than Christie's gibberish about pharmaceutical companies somehow being held criminally liable for "price gouging." But still not much sense. I expected this to be a train wreck but WOW!, I'm not sure there is any shame left in the Republican party other than that of naked bodies. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
Rubio's response is almost as dumb as the question. Not quite as bad though. "Those are discredited attacks by Democrats." Can't you discredit it? | ||
|
frazzle
United States468 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On October 29 2015 10:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: You have to admit Marco Rubio has some political skill on the stage. I think he's downloaded skills on dodging questions from the Matrix. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
I mean both of them are functionally possible and very similar. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23250 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15690 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
I find that extremely unlikely (particularly the ACA). These moderators are actually such utter shit. | ||
|
frazzle
United States468 Posts
On October 29 2015 10:06 ticklishmusic wrote: Just gonna hop back onto this discussion by quoting from a random point: STEM has a bad rap for being heavily about memorization and frameworks. While maybe at a few places that is true, I think it is a mischaracterization about the vast majority of programs. The problem is that you have to walk before you can run let alone fly, and the waking part requires quite a large body of knowledge before you can get started on anything meaningful. For example, while I can understand clinical oncology pretty well, it took years to get to the point-- I had to take intro bio, genetics, biochem, microbio (and the various pre-reqs for some of those classes) before I could get to my cancer bio class. Think of the beauty and logic in quantitative fields like physics, engineering and computer science-- think of how creative and how elegant solutions are to math problems that stand unsolved for hundreds of years, or the ingenuity it took to get a rocket into space. I can read about sort of how these things work and appreciate the human intellect for these things, but I can barely comprehend the mechanics and details of how all these things get done. Did your wonderful, eye-opening humanities education let you see how amazing and creative STEM can be? Or is ignorance (or something else) the cause of your blindness? PS. I probably read more books every year than you (if we want to measure dicks that way). I personally got sucked into my studies by a few classes. I used to mock people who weren't math/physics/chemistry types. But in uni, after having a few classes on shit I was never exposed to in high school, I found it hard to spend that too much time studying STEM courses. There was so much I had missed out on. You are right though. STEM has its own beauty to it. I personally feel humanities courses should be offered more in HS so you get less of my reaction. When you get to uni you should have some basic grounding in logic, ethics, religion, sociology, pscychology, etc. | ||
|
notesfromunderground
188 Posts
On October 29 2015 09:48 xDaunt wrote: Would you vote for Trump because you think he'd change things for the better or because you think he'd be such a colossal disaster that he'd collapse the system? (I'm guessing the latter) Mostly the latter. But he does sometimes display some common sense that the establishment candidates have brainwashed themselves out of | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
Just like the Democratic debate. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv18075 gofns9229 summit1g7015 JimRising  625WinterStarcraft389 ViBE119 Livibee41 Trikslyr41 kaitlyn27 |
|
Online Event
SC Evo League
Online Event
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Contender
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Summer Champion…
SC Evo League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
Dispossess them all and let God sort em out.
