EPTI may actually buy something if it's not too pricey :>
Tossgirl's online shopping mall - Page 4
| Forum Index > Closed |
Kiett
United States7639 Posts
I may actually buy something if it's not too pricey :> | ||
|
oygp
United States40 Posts
On July 25 2012 08:10 Chef wrote: What exactly do you disagree with? That it's sad, or that she's basically accepted the stereotypical female role? The former is an opinion, and certainly if you think this is where women should be it wouldn't make you sad. The latter you haven't provided any good evidence against. Heavily simplified, one could look at this like 'her mind wasn't good enough to compete with men in BW, so now she has to make money off her looks.' As someone young women might have looked up to as a possibility to competing in stereotypically male areas, this is certainly a step backward. Differentiated from someone who just always wanted to own a fashion store (influenced by societal expectations or not). This is like an unhappy fall-back option. Not that we didn't know years ago TossGirl was a write off, but this is the embodiment of that failure. So again, I'm not saying that modeling is a dispicable or disgusting or shameful career, it's quite legitimate, but there is no doubt that she as a figure who attempted to enter a male domain is going to warrant special attention when she returns to stereotypically feminine means. Stop being brainwashed by the feminazis... | ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6169 Posts
On July 25 2012 10:22 Kiett wrote: omfg the blue dress is so cute I may actually buy something if it's not too pricey :> I love that all of the posts before yours are either "omg Tossgirl *swoon*" or feminist ranting. And then you come along, and you focus on the most important thing about this store. The clothes. Kiett wins for getting the point! Also, running what I think are the prices through google for USD, I think they look pretty decent. I could be wrong, I can't read Korean; the shipping, though, would be a beast. (Also - Tossgirl and her sister look great, hope the store does very well. And there's no agenda here - if a business owner can model their own clothes, it's a cost saving measure.) | ||
JSy
149 Posts
On July 25 2012 08:10 Chef wrote: What exactly do you disagree with? That it's sad, or that she's basically accepted the stereotypical female role? The former is an opinion, and certainly if you think this is where women should be it wouldn't make you sad. The latter you haven't provided any good evidence against. Heavily simplified, one could look at this like 'her mind wasn't good enough to compete with men in BW, so now she has to make money off her looks.' As someone young women might have looked up to as a possibility to competing in stereotypically male areas, this is certainly a step backward. Differentiated from someone who just always wanted to own a fashion store (influenced by societal expectations or not). This is like an unhappy fall-back option. Not that we didn't know years ago TossGirl was a write off, but this is the embodiment of that failure. So again, I'm not saying that modeling is a dispicable or disgusting or shameful career, it's quite legitimate, but there is no doubt that she as a figure who attempted to enter a male domain is going to warrant special attention when she returns to stereotypically feminine means. Celebrities operating online shopping malls under their name is common and was a big trend recently. Is it a fall-back for celebrities whose popularity is waining? Sometimes. But both Male AND female celebrities do this, and many at the peak of their fame. Not to get into the fact that traditional modeling isn't some kind of subjugation enforced only on women, but the context in this case really flies counter to your point. | ||
|
Thenerf
United States258 Posts
| ||
|
MaestroSC
United States2073 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
We got more hot pictures of Tossgirl in 10 minutes than in the past 10 years. Not long ago, someone on TL said that if KeSPA or teams could release every replay of every game played it would be amazing. Well this is even better. I like how they disabled the right click on the website. As if this is going to stop me to save the pictures... edit : lol at how they named the files on the server ... http://tossgirl.co.kr/web/upload/hotpants.jpg | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
drool | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On July 25 2012 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote: When do they sell NaDa clothes? http://www.nadamall.com/ | ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On July 25 2012 11:06 lichter wrote: Bikinis not modeled >.> Edit: Nvm found it drool Bikinis are not modeled by Tossgirl or her sister. Not very exciting if the model in the bikini can't exceed 300 apm.... | ||
|
JerKy
Korea (South)3013 Posts
| ||
|
JMave
Singapore1806 Posts
| ||
|
starfries
Canada3508 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
| ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5913 Posts
On July 25 2012 10:57 endy wrote: We got more hot pictures of Tossgirl in 10 minutes than in the past 10 years. A new reason to be an STX antifan, hording her all to themselves. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On July 25 2012 12:33 Antisocialmunky wrote: A new reason to be an STX antifan, hording her all to themselves. How many STX fans were hoarding that anyway? I think they all had a larger man-crush for Kal than they had for Tossgirl. :p | ||
|
Agrajag
Sweden38 Posts
Don't get me wrong, it's not sad for her sake; of course she should do whatever she wants to do, and I wish her the best of luck with it. If this is what she wants, she should go for it. Actually, sad is perhaps the wrong word to begin with. Maybe unfortunate is a better one. It's unfortunate for the world of progaming, from the perspective of gender equality, when a rolemodel like tossgirl conforms to a stereotype like this. Having said that, she is indeed pretty, and I'm sure she'll be successful in her fashion and modeling career. <3 | ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
| ||
| ||
This is pretty sad to be honest. It's not that there is anything particularly wrong with fashion or modeling, but to basically see the full decline of a woman who stood for the somewhat feminist idea of women in ESPORTS to what is essentially the most stereotypical female stereotypical work there is... Especially when you consider that so many people told her she was just on STX for her looks etc, that her only power was the objectification of her body (even in her interviews people did not really comment much on her ability to interview, so much as her photogenic face)...
