Seahawks Win the Superbowl - Page 13

On January 17 2006 17:05 NuclearAntelope wrote:

And I quote:
"Going to DelHomme. He's not that great of a QB, he just has one of the top WR's in the league."

Slight difference between those two statements. Saying he's "not that great" of a QB is pretty much just a nice way to say that you do not think highly of him at all. I guess you must not think highly of Tom Brady, either, since both of them play their best when the pressure is on.

You neglected the other few hundred words I wrote, so that's that I guess.

On January 17 2006 17:28 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:


No, saying that says he's a good QB, but nothing super-special.

Tom Brady is a great QB, I'll never deny that, but I think some people overrate him a bit. They act like he's the second coming of Christ, or something.

Also, to -_-, my post was in response to you, I just didn't quote you. You're asking me to explain things, in fact, everyone is asking these things of me, that I simply cannot explain. I don't know why they didn't do certain things, but they didn't.

Also, I'm not the only person in the world who doesn't think they ran enough. I was just listening to the radio, and the guys there said they never established the run, and that they handled Smith all wrong. The Bears did not play the game they know how to play.

Finally, the run is not all about "Give it to Thomas Jones and he'll make it!" it's about clock control. Incomplete passes stop the clock, but every run guarantees another 30 seconds ticking off the clock, barring an injury or timeout. The three ways to beat Smith are these: Don't give their offense the ball (aka controlling the clock), double cover him, or pressure the QB. The Bears did NONE of these things, and that's why they got beat. The ones to blame are the coaching staff.