|
oG) will be banned.. u will see..
playing with kors turned out to be bad.. if they didnt do it they wouldnt be 1. place.. but at least stay in this league.. now they are banned 8/
there's no other option. Teams in wc3 were treaten the same way. THe rules for bw also say : accshare ~> ban
|
This should be a freewin for ToT if it's true.
|
On November 06 2005 11:05 littlechava wrote: og)semen
rofl nice typo (hope u didn't do it intentionally T_T)
|
a statement from oGaming can be read on www.ogaming.org I have nothing more to say in this thread.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
|
ret beat schniblor strelok beat breakdown fish beat ex(fairly sure) gentleman beat gurram 2v2 to be played, fish/break vs ret/strelok i think. not sure
|
I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.<
|
MyM 3-1 x6AMD
2v2 to be played
iG 2-0 iD
oG 3-2 ToT
esa 2-2 Tmg
|
On November 06 2005 11:20 Kaolla wrote: I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.<
lol its not about getting good competition and that Jang is a better player, its about they doing something that are AGAINST the rules.
|
On November 06 2005 11:23 DaZe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2005 11:20 Kaolla wrote: I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.< lol its not about getting good competition and that Jang is a better player, its about they doing something that are AGAINST the rules.
I dont think anyone would have complained if i played for oG
|
Netherlands13554 Posts
On November 06 2005 11:20 Kaolla wrote: I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.<
can people GET more retarded? :/
|
|
On November 06 2005 11:26 Twisted wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2005 11:20 Kaolla wrote: I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.< can people GET more retarded? :/
yea i think if they would all be midgets like Erwin and fkn hated by anyone living in the same country... good arguments tho... maybe grow up and actually try to say anything that adds something to it? stinkin fag >.<
|
ToT)MidiaN(
England2183 Posts
I was merely curious as to why jang's zvz was so good, so i checked hotkeys of that game and the previous games... it was obvious that it wasn't jang, but infact firefist who was playing and thus i reported it. Surely anyone would've done the same? AFTERALL - IT IS AGAINST THE RULES. i don't give a toss if i lose, i don't go around saying i'm great and i don't claim to be better than firefist or jang, but what they did was against the rules so i reported it, just like anyone else would've -_-....
|
Koala or Bas isn't it? These kind of things are against the rules so ofcourse they should be treated like the rules state. Even if this was SK Telecom vs KTF or whatever, it's not allowed. A statement like that only shows that u have a personal reason ( hate for erwin or rob perhaps? ) to say such things.
|
well maybe but at the same time u want to say ToT isnt good enough to beat even non semi pro's and thats kinda bad imho... specially cause u (ToT) tried to prove u could lately... and i think if i would've played and lost no one would've cared... just the fact that u check replays to look for it says alot imho... still have a loooooooooong way to go
|
the statement on oG is ''ok'' . But still i dont see how ToT) did anything wrong.. except some flaming by certain persons. WHich is one thing.. account sharing is another.. ANd u dindt even say directly, that AN OTHER PERSON PLAYED WITH NICK OF AN OTHER PERSON. Why in the hell did they not simply replace the player ? .. T_T
|
On November 06 2005 11:34 Kaolla wrote: well maybe but at the same time u want to say ToT isnt good enough to beat even non semi pro's and thats kinda bad imho... specially cause u (ToT) tried to prove u could lately... and i think if i would've played and lost no one would've cared... just the fact that u check replays to look for it says alot imho... still have a loooooooooong way to go
lol u are stupid..
wtf are u even talking about ? Several different things, which have really nothing to do with this account sharing thing. WHAT DO U WANT TO TELL US ? O.o
OG) cheated ~> Cheating ~> ban
simple isnt it ?
|
yep it sure is against the rules, but the thing is, it didnt have any effect to the outcome.. It doesnt matter if midian would have won jang or firefist, still tot would have lost and there is not a damn thing that changes it.. Its not like i think this is a good thing, but it just happens to be so that this "abuse" or whatever changes nothing at all..
|
Netherlands13554 Posts
On November 06 2005 11:30 Kaolla wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2005 11:26 Twisted wrote:On November 06 2005 11:20 Kaolla wrote: I think its bullshit personally... Jang is a better player, ToT was just lucky that he didnt play and some (probably worse) other player played... if ToT really wants to be the best, this shouldnt be a problem at all... However if this is the way they want to achieve a win they should of course, but i dont think they will... ToT is always wanting to prove they can compete with Koreans, why complain when they get a less good korean playing.... It wouldnt make sense to me, and it would prove to me they gave up on beating even 'mediocre' koreans... I mean they should be happy Jang didnt play, not the opposite... And if they will complain i think it would be the proof ToT is not ready to compete with Korean teams just yet, even if they played some friendly wars and won... It's not like Boxer or Reach was playing, it was a mistake and i think if ToT would be mature they would admit their loss vs a (probably) less good player >.< not saying FireFist would be bad at all >.< can people GET more retarded? :/ yea i think if they would all be midgets like Erwin and fkn hated by anyone living in the same country... good arguments tho... maybe grow up and actually try to say anything that adds something to it? stinkin fag >.<
It's better not to say anything at all instead of being a retard that posts his thoughts about something. Be quiet and play with your dinky toys loser.
|
|
|
|