NBA Playoffs 2012 - Page 258
Forum Index > Closed |
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
![]() | ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
scaban84
United States1080 Posts
| ||
nufcrulz
Singapore934 Posts
On June 13 2012 11:01 Jerubaal wrote: This is how I felt watching Spurs vs OKC. How are these schlubs beating us! I know right? How in the world is OKC in the finals? | ||
XoXiDe
United States620 Posts
| ||
thekhan
42 Posts
On June 13 2012 11:11 nufcrulz wrote: I know right? How in the world is OKC in the finals? OKC's a lot faster then the Spurs and were able to force a lot of turnovers. Miami can keep the same pace and with Lebron/Wade primarily controlling the ball it's tough to force turnovers into transition baskets. | ||
ecstatica
United States542 Posts
| ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
thuracine
United States582 Posts
On June 13 2012 11:16 Itsmedudeman wrote: Pretty sure miami is winning cause of a ridiculous fg % and battier. OKC has the better FG% just 3 less threes | ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On a side note, SA was a half decent big man away from winning handily. I partly blame Pops for not playing Blair more though. | ||
RowdierBob
Australia13007 Posts
| ||
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
| ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
Eh, I thought Duncan, Ginobili, Diaw and Jackson all played pretty well, granted they took away Parker. It was Neal and Green that no showed. You're right in that the older players couldn't carry the whole game and thus needed those younger players to step up. I thought their problem was that they couldn't hold on to leads- or keep even for that matter- because they had no defensive interior presence with Duncan off and they rarely got easy points (all exacerbated by age, of course). | ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
Because he's not bank. | ||
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
| ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On June 13 2012 11:38 heliusx wrote: all you okc doubters will be in for a rude awakening. they will explode in the 2nd half like always, unlike miami 3rd was best quarter for Miami throughout the Boston series whereas it was almost always the best quarter for SA in their series with OKC. Not that that means anything, but whatever. xD | ||
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On June 13 2012 11:40 Jerubaal wrote: 3rd was best quarter for Miami throughout the Boston series whereas it was almost always the best quarter for SA in their series with OKC. Not that that means anything, but whatever. xD uhm did you watch the entire sas okc series or? also read: 2nd half. not that sas okc series or mia bos series have anything to do with this series, but whatever. xD | ||
| ||