EPT[Noobs] SC2vsBW/IsBWDying/etc Megathread - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Torenhire
United States11681 Posts
| ||
|
lungo
Denmark276 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:32 Canadium wrote: The skill level of BW commands my respect more so than the skill level in SC2 does. Simple as that. I find BW more entertaining for this reason and because the game has character which gives it staying power. Does this mean I hate SC2 and want it to die? No. It's doing very well here in North America as an e-sport and I hope it keeps it up. If there was a gun to my head yeah I would pick BW but I see no reason why both can't thrive. +1 on this | ||
|
Terrifyer
United States338 Posts
| ||
|
Armathai
1023 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:20 dementrio wrote: You're completely wrong. The real reason we can't have good things is that they took out patrol micro. You are so right! And of course.. the best unit to patrol micro with... | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
I would be very interested if some bw pros transferred to SC2. but I don't want that. I would prefer to have two starcrafts which are both great for different reasons than have one. I'm also embarrassed every time someone says something stupid about bw dying et cetera. Sorry for them :< | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:28 Energizer wrote: BW has lan... I dont think they really have any arguments to top that. I meant in terms of gameplay, not in terms of networking with that argument chess is better then SC2. | ||
|
Zergneedsfood
United States10671 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:38 Kipsate wrote: I meant in terms of gameplay, not in terms of networking with that argument chess is better then SC2. Wait....it's not? | ||
|
Nivoh
Norway259 Posts
| ||
|
Firesilver
United Kingdom1190 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:38 Kipsate wrote: I meant in terms of gameplay, not in terms of networking with that argument chess is better then SC2. That'd make it better than BW also, y'know, the 0 lactency in chess and all.. | ||
|
Torenhire
United States11681 Posts
Natural Expansion to C5 | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
| ||
|
seRapH
United States9756 Posts
| ||
|
Skeggaba
Korea (South)1556 Posts
I think that this will be a reality. BW is a much better game, and if you are not playing professionally there´s no reason to play it at all. I understand that everyone wants to try their luck at the game that can give you actual fame and fortune, but i think that players eventually will come back and play casual BW just like the old days once the hype is over/they go on a tilt. My favorite players of all time (outside korea) is Ret, Mondragon, Nony and Oystein. Ahzzz is pretty awesome as well. I hope they collect themselves and go back to the game they once loved. Im not seeing mondy playing it since he pretty much went inactive before even SCII came out. Oystein? No idea, dont think that he plays any of the game. Same with ahzzz. Nony and ret is pretty much tied up in team liquid which is unfortunate. But we have to give them time! Imagine this: Ret v. Pro7ect in ISL 3 finals. WOWOWOWOW. Its worth waiting for! | ||
|
Kiett
United States7639 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50121 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:44 Torenhire wrote: Vulture to E4 Natural Expansion to C5 Fantasy would break the game and move C4 to everyone. | ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:46 BLinD-RawR wrote: Fantasy would break the game and move C4 to everyone. damn that is well played. | ||
|
masterbreti
Korea (South)2711 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:45 seraphe wrote: Windows 7 hates me and wont let me play BW, so I play SC2. Clearly SC2 > BW, just because it runs on my computer. /bitter Blizz released a windows 7 fix a while back for colour. so maybe you can play the awesome lovable and amazing bw!!!! :D:D:D::D | ||
|
Krehlmar
Sweden1149 Posts
| ||
|
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
| ||
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
| ||
