EPTThe Show Your Face (Post your Pic Thread) - Page 42
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
| ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
| ||
|
0_0
United States2090 Posts
| ||
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On May 03 2005 13:54 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: YOU SAID IT, PAL ![[image loading]](http://www.geocities.com/tard17/spliffing.jpg) This picture could own every thread. Infact, I think you should get special permission to make this your signature. I'd have a real hard time arguing or even disagreeing with you when that picture is glaring out at me, letting me know you'll introduce me to the business end of your shoe if I step out of line even once. | ||
|
Tien
Russian Federation4447 Posts
On May 03 2005 21:01 BroOd wrote: I'd post pictures of my girlfriend here, but I'm sure Moltke would jerk off to them while simultaneously browbeating me with his own religious guilt. Let him do whatever he wants! Show us the PICS!! NOW! | ||
|
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
On May 03 2005 16:47 Orlandu wrote: Moltke, just as you have every right to express your opinion, Trident has every right to post pictures of HIS girlfriend that AGREED for it to be ok. Just as you have every right to express your opinion and tell people they're wrong, everyone else has just as much right to express their opinion and tell you that you're full of shit. Just chill out. No harm is being done here. Cyric spoke up with good intentions in mind. All you seem to be wanting to do is cause controversy. It may be your right to, but it's everyone else's right to tell you that you're out of line. Again, RELAX. No one is getting hurt here, everything was all fine and dandy until, surprise surprise, you spoke out. Even if you're right in all of your opinions and everyone else is being insane extremists, it STILL isn't causing any harm to anyone. Hearing this bullshit time and time again is causing harm to me. I can't wait until it hits all you enlightened, liberally minded folks that "it's not hurting anyone" doesn't justify jack. It's not a universally accepted criterion for morality, boss, and you show some seriously piss poor philosophical assumptions gumming up your reasoning there every time you interject it. You should stop pretending like someone else does (or even should) share them. And I'm not just talking to you, Orlandu. I'm talking to everyone who whips this knee-jerk rationalization every time someone starts talking right and wrong. Right and wrong used to mean more than pleasure and pain, and they still should. | ||
|
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
On May 03 2005 03:58 XaI)CyRiC wrote: this time there seems to be no one who remotely supports your position (how could any reasonable person do so?). Just to reiterate: I support his position, and I'm so fucking reasonable it hurts. | ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
On May 03 2005 21:38 HULKAMANIA wrote: Hearing this bullshit time and time again is causing harm to me. I can't wait until it hits all you enlightened, liberally minded folks that "it's not hurting anyone" doesn't justify jack. It's not a universally accepted criterion for morality, boss, and you show some seriously piss poor philosophical assumptions gumming up your reasoning there every time you interject it. You should stop pretending like someone else does (or even should) share them. And I'm not just talking to you, Orlandu. I'm talking to everyone who whips this knee-jerk rationalization every time someone starts talking right and wrong. Right and wrong used to mean more than pleasure and pain, and they still should. What seems right to you might not seem right for somebody else. You might have noticed that this is the case here. And since it is presumptuous and ignorant to say which side has the moral supremacy, reasoning such as "it's not hurting anyone" is perfectly fine. How do you determine what is actually right or wrong anyway? What else does right and wrong mean besides pleasure and pain? In the end, doesn't everything come down to that? | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36388 Posts
edit: because i get that familiar buzzing feeling in my head when he posts... | ||
|
baal
10541 Posts
On May 03 2005 07:49 BroOd wrote: My Dog ![[image loading]](http://img216.echo.cx/img216/6772/irelandpictures0033mo.jpg) woooooooooooot photon cannon eyes! | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
maleorderbride
United States2916 Posts
then he has really cleaned up to post on here. He is one the biggest fucking morons in x-17, which is difficult to say the least. Why does motle suck so much fucking ass? | ||
|
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
On May 03 2005 21:49 ItchReliever wrote: What seems right to you might not seem right for somebody else. You might have noticed that this is the case here. And since it is presumptuous and ignorant to say which side has the moral supremacy, reasoning such as "it's not hurting anyone" is perfectly fine. How do you determine what is actually right or wrong anyway? What else does right and wrong mean besides pleasure and pain? In the end, doesn't everything come down to that? Reasoning such as "it's not hurting anyone" is moral reasoning, junior! Can't you see that you divested yourself of all authority to make a moral judgement ONE SENTENCE BEFORE you made one. Does that strike you as "presumptous"? How about "ignorant"? I'll tell you how you go about determining right and wrong. You determine whether or not the universe exists through the power of a supreme being or processes of sheer chance. If it's the latter, you conclude that right and wrong are bullshit and do whatever the hell you feel like. If not, you determine whether or not there is, in the nature of that supreme being, some characteristic or group of characteristics which behoove you to conform yourself to its standards. You decide whether there is a moral lawgiver, champ. Then you decide whether or not that moral lawgiver is worth your time. There it is, folks. A one paragraph guide on how to determine morality complete with handy references on exactly when your cosmological assumptions neatly remove all your ability to logically believe morality, as such, exists. And for the last time: No, no, no, fuck no. Not everything comes down to pleasure or pain. God damn it. Where have your balls gone? Where are the folks who died for the shit in which they believed? You pick any marytr for any cause in the history of the world, and try to extrapolate from their actions to what extent they would empathize with these pansy ass little maxims of yours about pleasure and pain being the end all be all or moral determination. I don't know what kind of sucker would believe that, but I certainly don't. But the funny thing is that from your podium of tolerant, moral relativism you still demand that I should. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
| ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
On May 03 2005 22:09 HULKAMANIA wrote: Reasoning such as "it's not hurting anyone" is moral reasoning, junior! Can't you see that you divested yourself of all authority to make a moral judgement ONE SENTENCE BEFORE you made one. Does that strike you as "presumptous"? How about "ignorant"? I said that it was “fine”, as in it’s an acceptable way of thinking. You said that it was wrong, I said it was “fine”. I never claimed that it was the one and only right philosophy. You, on the other hand, seem to be rather bigoted.  | ||
|
HULKAMANIA
United States1219 Posts
On May 03 2005 22:11 BroOd wrote: From our podiums, you look like an indignant little dwarf, "champ". Well good thing one's size and temperment relative to the greater population determine the validity of his arguments, or you might have actually been forced to engage them. | ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
| ||
| ||
