|
I can't believe this still is needed but religious and gun control side discussions will be met with harsh penalties from page 52 and onwards. |
On July 23 2011 04:23 FallDownMarigold wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2011 04:19 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:12 FallDownMarigold wrote:On July 23 2011 04:09 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:04 PanN wrote:On July 23 2011 04:02 trucane wrote:
What always surprised me in things like this is that no one tries to do anything despite being unarmed. Yes this time it was kids so I understand the whole running part but if everyone would have bum rushed the gunman instead of trying to run and hide maybe 2-3 would have died and a half dozen would have gotten injured after all one guy with a semi automatic can only do so much damage before he has to reload or get overrun.
I do realize this sounds logical from a "sitting behind the computer screen" perspective but still I can't help thinking about it Oh come the fuck on man, you're not being realistic at all and you know it. Yeah, 2-3 kids would have died if everyone "bum rushed" the guy with a MACHINE GUN. nobody had a machine gun. How did this tread go from he had a rifle. to he had a fully automatic rilfe. to an assualt rifle with optics. to a machine gun. You all know these are WILDLY different weapons right? NYT.com Wow thats quite the jump there. From a Rifle with a scope to an assualt rifle with optics Scope = optics. Don't bother arguing there. Really? Look up the word 'optics'. Assault rifle = rifle with semi auto/select fire + detachable cartridge. Not a "jump" at all. What is your point? You suggesting someone put 20 people down with a bolt action rifle? Use your head
Sorry friend an assualt rifle is like an m4 with a reflex sight. i can get an automatic rifle from wall mart and put a scope on it. 2 wildy different things and there a differance between automatic and fully automatic u dont have a clue what you are talking about.
|
I don't care who it was right now, all I care about is that they get everyone safe.
Hopefully they will get that under control and can minimize the casualties ... sometimes I'm just disgusted by being a human when others of my kind can do things like that 
Take care, everyone!
|
|
|
On July 23 2011 04:23 qwaykee wrote:
Don't think it's time and evidence enough to start speculating who's to blame or not. Keep your thoughts and speculation for yourself.
This, please.
All the best for my badass people from Norway, fuck the people who attacked your country!
|
|
|
Don't assume that just because a group is claiming responsibility that they actually had any part of the attacks. Wait until confirmation before you guys start pointing fingers.
|
On July 23 2011 04:25 ellirc wrote:
I work 100 meters from where the bomb went off. I was sitting by the window and was thrown back by the blast. I will never forget the fear I felt and the sadness I experience now. Oslo will never be the same again :'(
So sorry for you man
|
On July 23 2011 04:23 FallDownMarigold wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2011 04:19 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:12 FallDownMarigold wrote:On July 23 2011 04:09 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:04 PanN wrote:On July 23 2011 04:02 trucane wrote:
What always surprised me in things like this is that no one tries to do anything despite being unarmed. Yes this time it was kids so I understand the whole running part but if everyone would have bum rushed the gunman instead of trying to run and hide maybe 2-3 would have died and a half dozen would have gotten injured after all one guy with a semi automatic can only do so much damage before he has to reload or get overrun.
I do realize this sounds logical from a "sitting behind the computer screen" perspective but still I can't help thinking about it Oh come the fuck on man, you're not being realistic at all and you know it. Yeah, 2-3 kids would have died if everyone "bum rushed" the guy with a MACHINE GUN. nobody had a machine gun. How did this tread go from he had a rifle. to he had a fully automatic rilfe. to an assualt rifle with optics. to a machine gun. You all know these are WILDLY different weapons right? Rifle with scope. --> assault rifle with optics NYT.com Wow thats quite the jump there. From a Rifle with a scope to an assualt rifle with optics Scope = optics. Don't bother arguing there. Really? Look up the word 'optics'. Assault rifle = rifle with semi auto/select fire + detachable cartridge. Not a "jump" at all. What is your point? You suggesting someone put 20 people down with a bolt action rifle? Use your head
STOP WITH THIS FUCKING DEBATE!!!
Keep this related to Oslo, not to guns....
BTW, a terrorism expert said that the attacks were timed and that they had the signature of a major terrorist attack.
|
On July 23 2011 04:22 partisan wrote:http://www.jihadica.com/That's the source for the original claim of responsibility, and the retraction.
You can check out Will McCants twitter for more info. He was the guy that originally posted that and he is translating threads from one of the main Jihadi websites for everyone.
http://twitter.com/#!/will_mccants
|
Heart goes out to all you Norwegians, hopefully the worst has already happened and you all will be safe. <3
|
Well witnesses says he dressed up like a police man and asked them to line up, then he started shooting. If so that's just sick :S
|
This is god awful, first the blast, now the shooting that turned out even worse.. Bad times..
|
Just reading all this.. Im on holiday in spain. Sounds so terrible
So stay strong norwegians and other involved people<3
|
I feel disgusted. Sick to my stomach and I can't fucking believe this has happened. Especially not here.
Wake up call everybody, appreciate what you've got while you still have it. Peace & love
|
My highest desire right now is to say to those who did this:
"These people, that you killed in cold blood, are people who would never have agreed with any action to kill anyone, no matter his crimes, they and most other people in our countries want nothing but peace between all, we cannot effect our governments to do exactly what we wish but we were born here and raised to be who we are we are ants. Can you affect all that happens in the world, ASSHOLES???"
I'm getting memories of 9/11, i was sick and home form school listening to a Rock-channel on the radio, when the new came, from then until now i have been fairly cold about it and critizing US for various things. Now i fucking understand how the fuck it feels, my apologies, even if its not my country it feels as if it was.
|
On July 23 2011 04:25 ellirc wrote:
I work 100 meters from where the bomb went off. I was sitting by the window and was thrown back by the blast. I will never forget the fear I felt and the sadness I experience now. Oslo will never be the same again :'(
Wow, that sounds terrible. Make sure you get yourself checked out if you were close enough for it throw you back. Stay safe over there
|
We are fine... WE ARE VIKINGS!
But in all seriousness, seems like there was a home made bomb about 250-600kilos. 7 Confirmed dead in total (with the shooting on the island).
My mom where about 150m from the bomb when it went off, she is fine :D
The maniac on the island have been captured and it seems like we are getting our shit together, most of the people who are hurt are in hospitals, but they need blood donors!
|
On July 23 2011 04:21 Dr_Jones wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2011 04:19 Zarahtra wrote:
I'm sure everyone here from Norway is reading the internal news, but just to be safe(and didnt see anyone else post it before) your blood bank is requesting type O blood. They need all types, but bloodtype O is "pig blood" and can be pumped into everyone. In either case, make sure you give blood if you have the chance, because the "blood bank" will need to be replenished after this for sure! :/
To my knowledge, type 0 blood can still cause complications due to the antibodies present in it, though they might have some method to remove it.
Be sure to have all types of blood anyway.
|
On July 23 2011 04:27 carloselcoco wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2011 04:23 FallDownMarigold wrote:On July 23 2011 04:19 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:12 FallDownMarigold wrote:On July 23 2011 04:09 Detwiler wrote:On July 23 2011 04:04 PanN wrote:On July 23 2011 04:02 trucane wrote:
What always surprised me in things like this is that no one tries to do anything despite being unarmed. Yes this time it was kids so I understand the whole running part but if everyone would have bum rushed the gunman instead of trying to run and hide maybe 2-3 would have died and a half dozen would have gotten injured after all one guy with a semi automatic can only do so much damage before he has to reload or get overrun.
I do realize this sounds logical from a "sitting behind the computer screen" perspective but still I can't help thinking about it Oh come the fuck on man, you're not being realistic at all and you know it. Yeah, 2-3 kids would have died if everyone "bum rushed" the guy with a MACHINE GUN. nobody had a machine gun. How did this tread go from he had a rifle. to he had a fully automatic rilfe. to an assualt rifle with optics. to a machine gun. You all know these are WILDLY different weapons right? Rifle with scope. --> assault rifle with optics NYT.com Wow thats quite the jump there. From a Rifle with a scope to an assualt rifle with optics Scope = optics. Don't bother arguing there. Really? Look up the word 'optics'. Assault rifle = rifle with semi auto/select fire + detachable cartridge. Not a "jump" at all. What is your point? You suggesting someone put 20 people down with a bolt action rifle? Use your head STOP WITH THIS FUCKING DEBATE!!! Keep this related to Oslo, not to guns.... BTW, a terrorism expert said that the attacks were timed and that they had the signature of a major terrorist attack.
It is about oslo man my point is that it makes a large differance and say alot about what happened if the shooter had an automatic hunting rifle with a scope or an ak47 with a reflex sight. Do you not se how that could change the whole situtation?
|
On July 23 2011 04:19 ElectricWizard wrote:
I just want to clarify that there is NOTHING TO INDICATE THIS BEING AN ISLAM-RELATED ATTACK IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. (I loathe religion and fundamentalism but stop pulling shit out of thin air already)
It's naive not to accept the likeliness that the shooter was a converted Islamic extremest.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
