EPTSavior plays BW games on Afreeca - Page 54
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
motoharu
Peru18 Posts
| ||
|
Gann1
United States1578 Posts
i dont have a problem with him streaming but you can't deny that he did that | ||
|
Kalent
Canada253 Posts
On July 26 2011 02:34 motoharu wrote: Korean fans why don't forgive Savior? Koreans value honor highly.. Savior betrayed his coach, fans, and the game that made him famous and left a permanent, negative mark on it. Forgive? Never. He should just stay away from the BW scene. | ||
|
Romantic
United States1844 Posts
| ||
|
Aus)MaCrO
Australia349 Posts
| ||
|
Romantic
United States1844 Posts
On July 26 2011 21:08 Aus)MaCrO wrote: LOL who nuked him? I didn't see the name. I think it was just someone he found while laddering at 1450 points. A nuke killed ~ 20 hydras, 10-15 drones, and his already damaged from tanks hatchery along with a couple defilers and he gg'd. The other nukes didn't kill much. | ||
|
Motivate
2860 Posts
that being said, people who say he should be let back into BW should GTFO. lifetime ban was completely fair and justified imo. but he shouldn't be stigmatised from society on top of it. | ||
|
101toss
3232 Posts
On July 26 2011 21:18 Motivate wrote: i don't see the issue. let him do what he wants, he has already been punished. that being said, people who say he should be let back into BW should GTFO. lifetime ban was completely fair and justified imo. but he shouldn't be stigmatised from society on top of it. They should let him in sc2  | ||
|
Black[CAT]
Malaysia2589 Posts
Every BW thread is not complete without any sc2 comments.... | ||
|
Merfyn
United Kingdom945 Posts
On July 26 2011 21:52 Black[CAT] wrote: Every BW thread is not complete without any sc2 comments.... And Vice Versa, heh  | ||
|
Romantic
United States1844 Posts
| ||
|
Gann1
United States1578 Posts
on second thought, it's sort of valid, since he is streaming BW... | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
djbhINDI
United States372 Posts
On July 27 2011 03:49 krndandaman wrote: nah good @ sc2 =/= good at bw afaik but good at bw usually means good at sc2 and wow i just watched savior + Show Spoiler + lose 3:4 to [neox] clan, losing to the same person 3 times. i would never think there could be a non-pro who could 3:1 savior Well, he's not really at pro level anymore for all we know. I mean, you can't say that the current quality of his play is even close to as good as it was during his reign of terror. On the other hand, who knows if he's playing old pros or smurfs of current pros? | ||
|
Kalent
Canada253 Posts
| ||
|
SxYSpAz
United States1451 Posts
 On July 26 2011 22:11 Romantic wrote: I wonder how primarily SC2 fans would react if you went to all the threads about good SC2 players and said, "wow he is good. He should play BW. I think he would do well." I agree, segregated societies. The broodwar players can drink from THAT water fountain. | ||
|
Arterial
Australia1039 Posts
| ||
|
ponies
Indonesia9 Posts
| ||
|
Turbovolver
Australia2454 Posts
| ||
|
catabowl
United States815 Posts
On July 27 2011 03:49 krndandaman wrote: nah good @ sc2 =/= good at bw afaik but good at bw usually means good at sc2 and wow i just watched savior + Show Spoiler + lose 3:4 to [neox] clan, losing to the same person 3 times. i would never think there could be a non-pro who could 3:1 savior Spoilered response to the above statement. Lets not start this again but I did put my 2 cents on your quote. You can read it if you want. + Show Spoiler + No... this is wrong. Being good at BW =/= good at SC2. People get this wrong every time. What makes people good at SC2 is not because the played BW, it was because of the training time/devotion to the game. That's like saying if you're great in College at a sport you should automatically be good when you go pro. And that is wrong... and you can vice versa that. If you're good in the pros, that does not mean you were great in college. Now, For the purpose of this thread, I think Savior should not be competitive again at all. Gambling on your sport is basically the nail in your coffin no matter what. It's been 20+ years for Pete Rose in Baseball and still nothing for him. | ||
| ||
