EPTCan't wait for SKT to go 4-0 3-4 0-1 =P
[SPL] Playoffs - STX SouL vs Samsung KHAN Day2 - Page 46
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
darktreb
United States3019 Posts
Can't wait for SKT to go 4-0 3-4 0-1 =P | ||
|
tedster
984 Posts
This makes the most sense because I am shortsighted and refuse to acknowledge that Proleague is and has always been about series play/winning matches and not individual records. Also my team lost and so I am very upset. Also this sort of ruling should apply to all sports so if a team wins a division series 4-3 for example they should have to win the World Series by a really big margin or it doesn't count! This is my logic isnt it great | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
I guess I'll cheer for | ||
|
Presony-Boy
Israel812 Posts
| ||
|
FirstBorn
Romania3955 Posts
Must be hard to wait for something that's not going to happen. | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:32 Presony-Boy wrote: it just nice how all the khan fans make it sound like this format is perfect. if jangbi wouldve lost, then khan fans wouldve whined about the format. so seriously just let us the stx fans whine for a while till we all get over it, u dont even have to respond (talking to all the non-stx fans). Honestly, I think the format is completely fair. Maybe it's because I play tennis. In tennis, SETS matter, not GAMES. It doesn't matter if you win lose a 5-7 and win the other 7-6, the score is 1-1. Both teams knew that MATCHES mattered, not games. The individual game count simply does not matter. They prepared and set their lineup while keeping that in mind. | ||
|
BisuBoi
United States350 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:25 3clipse wrote: The fact that both teams understood the system doesn't lend it any sort of credibility. The entire point of a bo7 is to reduce variance and let the most skilled team win. You throw all that out the fucking window when you stage a bo1 as a tiebreaker. Variance? ONE Bo7 should be enough to "reduce variance." Count your team lucky that they got a second chance at all. In the old format, Khan would have advanced already and this second day wouldn't have even happened. | ||
|
TwoStep
United States294 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:33 faseman wrote: Can you expand? I don't quite get what you're saying. Khan barely wins the first set, and STX handily takes the 2nd. In both cases, the set score is 1-1 and the game score is 7-5 in favor of STX just like the game score is 12-9 in favor of the guy who won the 2nd set in tennis. However, after the decider, the guy with less games won (16-18) still wins the match. Like khan (6-7). sry, better example would be 06 76 76 | ||
|
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:37 BisuBoi wrote: In the old format, Khan would have advanced already and this second day wouldn't have even happened. That would've made me much happier than what happened here :S | ||
|
Nitan
United States3401 Posts
What, are there two Khan fans now? | ||
|
okum
France5779 Posts
I'm considering getting a sockpuppet fake STX fan account, but it'd be hard to top the real thing. Assuming other people didn't already do this. Jokes aside, I've been bad mannered enough for today now  . STX put up a great fight and would've deserved to win just as much as Khan. Nonetheless Khan won fair and square. The complaining about the format is just getting silly, that's all. | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:38 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: That would've made me much happier than what happened here :S Just be happy your team got a second chance under this format. | ||
|
darktreb
United States3019 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:35 3clipse wrote: The fact that you do not believe this to be possible shows that you know nothing about starcraft. It is improbable, but certianly possible. No, it's pretty ignorant for people to say "I could win a progamer with 5 pool". First of all, the progamer would have to think you were also a progamer to even consider exposing themselves to such a build. Second, short of 12 Nex or 14CC with no early scouting, there's a very good chance the progamer's monstrous worker micro (it's a lot harder than it looks ... there's a gap between even S-class progamers and average ones in worker micro, forget progamer versus whatever rank you are) will be able to at the very least survive the rush, in which case you're almost certainly not so far ahead that the pro's superior mechanics won't make up in like 3 minutes (even Draco was up 60-50 supply against JF in TSL finals in a PvP with identical builds). Unless you practice 5 pool a lot, it's pretty hard to micro your lings against well-microed workers. You think pros haven't practiced against 5 pool 100 times? | ||
|
kaleidoscope
Singapore2887 Posts
The format is okay, just bo7 twice, and a last set of bo1 for closure if tied.. | ||
|
tedster
984 Posts
And it's really not practical to have a 3rd Best of series, due to TV times and attendance/advertising, even though it would be pretty cool. The single ace match isn't perfect, but it is dramatic and it's certainly better than just a vanilla Bo15 format (which would be horrible) | ||
|
Nitan
United States3401 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:40 kaleidoscope wrote: I think what most ppl wants is that instead of a bo1 for a ultimate ace, they shud put bo3.. The format is okay, just bo7 twice, and a last set of bo1 for closure if tied.. I think what STX fans want is for STX to have won. | ||
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:24 OneOther wrote: Have you ever watched tennis? A basketball playoff series? A team needs to win what matters, not useless numbers... Neither of these are good examples. In a tennis grand slam final, the winner of the last set is determined by a tie-breaker that has a minimum of 7 points, not 4. It's like playing a mini-set... longer than 1 game, but much shorter than an entire set. And of course in some slam finals (as we all saw this year in the Wimbledon) you don't even get a tie-breaker in the last set. Basketball's playoffs are no better. Sure you can win 3 blow-out games and lose 3 nail-biters, but still the last match is played. They don't have some gay "ok lets determine this with a short over-time match to decide the winner" no they go into a 7th game. But here it seems like all all day STX was playing their hearts out to win, yet KHAN just wins 1 match to win it all. Of course playing a 3rd series would be crazy... but honestly I think they should have added more than putting everything both teams worked so hard for into 1 game. So what do I think? A bo5 in winner's league format, winner takes all. Would be FUCKING EPIC. | ||
|
Presony-Boy
Israel812 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:37 OneOther wrote: Honestly, I think the format is completely fair. Maybe it's because I play tennis. In tennis, SETS matter, not GAMES. It doesn't matter if you win lose a 5-7 and win the other 7-6, the score is 1-1. Both teams knew that MATCHES mattered, not games. The individual game count simply does not matter. They prepared and set their lineup while keeping that in mind. ya but as a tennis player, u obviously know that after the score is 1-1 or 2-2, they play a whole new set, not just 1 game. and thats my point, after 2 7 BO, 1 game isnt enough imo to declare a clear winner. lets say khan wouldve sent stork and stx wouldve sent modesty. lets say modesty wouldve won by using 4pool, how can u say thats fair? anyways this argument can go on forever. khan won and stx lost. | ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
I think this format is a keeper | ||
|
kaleidoscope
Singapore2887 Posts
| ||
| ||
