|
On February 24 2007 02:35 G.s)NarutO wrote:
And another thing
If he had sunkens...
If he had more
If he had...
You can go the same way for NaDa ..If he had tanks
If he had 20 cruiser
Please~ It is how it is.
Angriest guy, I like theorycraft, and I'm just pointing out the obvious. Savior could of defended, but he was late on the sunkens and paid for it by losing.
|
Vatican City State1176 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:35 G.s)NarutO wrote:
And another thing
If he had sunkens...
If he had more
If he had...
You can go the same way for NaDa ..If he had tanks
If he had 20 cruiser
Please~ It is how it is.
olol
he just said that it was not that bad played and was NO all in build
it's fact 5-10 sec later attack of nada and he would have been fine for the moment
|
Iraq1230 Posts
nothing wrong with the strat. it was just that nada stimmed twice on the way to saviors base and got there before the sunks were ready. stop saying that savior did a bad strat like u are the ones to decide 
|
now who has flawless game control?
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
how about both sides cut it with the bullshit statements
rivalry is fine, crap talking not
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:36 Dustin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2007 02:33 cravy wrote:
if he had sunkens morphed with some lings he would of defended fine <_< yea...or 15 mutas and some lurkers...he woulda been fine
Why are you being a bitch about having sunkens morphed in time? It was a stupid mistake that ended up the game for Savior. Damn
|
Sunkens are realistic, 20 BC arent. Naruto, pls stop posting. Everyone knows already that youre in love with nada.
|
On February 24 2007 02:36 OneOther wrote:
Naruto shut up. Having 3 sunkens morphed in time is actually realistic you fag
So, 24 Marine and 2 Tanks is not realistic? He went 14 CC, ... he could have build 2 rax instead of... so it would work.
|
On February 24 2007 02:38 oshibori_probe wrote:
now who has flawless game control?
lolol must u bite back?
|
|
|
I haven't seen game 1 or 2, but I do know the final score.
NaDa 3-1.
|
On February 24 2007 02:38 oshibori_probe wrote:
now who has flawless game control? do you even know what game control is hahaha
|
On February 24 2007 02:39 nortydog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2007 02:38 oshibori_probe wrote:
now who has flawless game control? do you even know what game control is hahaha
LOL
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:38 G.s)NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2007 02:36 OneOther wrote:
Naruto shut up. Having 3 sunkens morphed in time is actually realistic you fag So, 24 Marine and 2 Tanks is not realistic? He went 14 CC, ... he could have build 2 rax instead of... so it would work.
tard?
If he had morphed those sunkens FEW seconds earlier, he would have been fine. 24 marine and 2 tanks? Are you fucking serious? your logic sucks i am sorry
|
On February 24 2007 02:37 cravy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2007 02:35 G.s)NarutO wrote:
And another thing
If he had sunkens...
If he had more
If he had...
You can go the same way for NaDa ..If he had tanks
If he had 20 cruiser
Please~ It is how it is. Angriest guy, I like theorycraft, and I'm just pointing out the obvious. Savior could of defended, but he was late on the sunkens and paid for it by losing.
theorycraft =) good word ill be using that =)
|
why the commercials.. why!!!!
|
i only want to watch RT and then im going to sleep~_~
|
guys stop the bullshit already - -
|
what are these commercials about, what the hell?
|
On February 24 2007 02:40 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2007 02:38 G.s)NarutO wrote:On February 24 2007 02:36 OneOther wrote:
Naruto shut up. Having 3 sunkens morphed in time is actually realistic you fag So, 24 Marine and 2 Tanks is not realistic? He went 14 CC, ... he could have build 2 rax instead of... so it would work. tard? If he had morphed those sunkens FEW seconds earlier, he would have been fine. 24 marine and 2 tanks? Are you fucking serious? your logic sucks i am sorry
What do you think how many NaDa could get in 8 minutes with 2 rax or even 3 rax start?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
