EPT684 people are watching this site and 190 people are logged in.(TL time 02:15)
OSL Finals - NaDa vs sAviOr - Page 35
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
yakii
Korea (South)1448 Posts
684 people are watching this site and 190 people are logged in.(TL time 02:15) | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
saviors flawless game management is just speechless | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
he needs to kill expos very early if he wants to win.. he didnt touch a single expo.. that was just .. a no win situation.. | ||
|
Shiva_Chandra
Denmark341 Posts
| ||
|
Kroc.
Peru95 Posts
| ||
|
pacman
China41 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:11 Ash wrote: you newbie piece of shit you think every z player can use defilers like savior while using vessels is so much more easier? agree. considering how difficult it was too handle all the operations savior did. i say defiler consume is pretty balance | ||
|
Highways
Australia6119 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:12 ssj100 wrote: so boring. Dunno what you guys on about sigh. Al that showed was that SAvior is the best. Starcraft is dead. SAvior's won everything. you nothing nothing about starcraft then | ||
|
Sadir
Vatican City State1176 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:14 MaGic~PhiL wrote: consume is indeed a tad too strong.. but maybe thats what makes TvZ fair.. no one can tell me anymore T>Z if Zerg gets defilers with consume .. if z can come lategame withouth disadvantage AND more base, z is in favour but its fucking hard to get there | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:11 oshibori_probe wrote: wow do you have any brain cells at all? both players clearly started off playing at 50% of their full potential, nada had a good chance, albeit risky, at the start but didnt take it. Now savior takes a win from 1 big attack and all of a sudden its flawless, try judging a game by the playing not the reputation Calm down please -_- | ||
|
SmoKing2012
United States385 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
| ||
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7232 Posts
| ||
|
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
| ||
|
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
| ||
|
cravy
United States525 Posts
| ||
|
Ganfei1
China667 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:15 Shiva_Chandra wrote: ok, all of you shut the fuck up - you DON'T understand sc as well as niether nada or savior - and you AREN'T good enough to comment on what they shouldn't/should've done - and most importantly; AWESOME GAME :D Shutup you moron You sound like those dumbasses at GG.net who say we can't comment on replays because we aren't as good as the players + what is said is true hindsight is 20/20 Who gives a shit if we aren't able to do it, it doesn't mean we can't comment | ||
|
Zea!
9589 Posts
| ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:15 Kroc. wrote: That was an amazing game.. Anyone who says had he not had defilers, Savior would not have won, is damn retarded. Then go ask Nada to not use vessels. Any other zerg would have died, even with twice as much defilers as Savior had. Wait, I don't get your logic... So savior could've won those fights without any deflier support with those 12 lurkers vs 36 marines and meds, along with 4 tanks and 10 vessels. .. | ||
|
YoUr_KiLLeR
United States3420 Posts
On February 24 2007 02:11 oshibori_probe wrote: wow do you have any brain cells at all? both players clearly started off playing at 50% of their full potential, nada had a good chance, albeit risky, at the start but didnt take it. Now savior takes a win from 1 big attack and all of a sudden its flawless, try judging a game by the playing not the reputation hey are you fucking retarded. plz point out this one big attack for me. the game was a ton of small skirmishes and savior defended nadas many, many attacks beautifully. | ||
|
Nal_RaisL337
United States83 Posts
| ||
| ||
