EPTnada was so close to beating savior on arkanoid in the superfight, and the other maps are very pro-terran. who will win?
(obviously i am giving iris 0% odds of winning)
OSL Semifinal #1 - Page 32
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Resonate
United Kingdom8402 Posts
nada was so close to beating savior on arkanoid in the superfight, and the other maps are very pro-terran. who will win? (obviously i am giving iris 0% odds of winning) | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
Stop being bitter and twisting things. | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
This OSL is all Iris. CJ! CJ! CJ! CJ HWAITING. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:14 Orome wrote: If Nada plays a respectable series against Savior, he's definitely #2. Stop being bitter and twisting things. Art Out of your mouth the sentence : Stop being bitter and twisting things. Im really laughing my ass of right now. The guy who says Casy was better, NaDa was lucky, Casy deserved to win. Casy understand TvT better than Nada, THe guy who said Nadas strategic skills are bad compared to casys, the guy who basicaly cant accept NaDa > Casy in this series and almost pretends as if Casy won the series says this sentence. This is pure sarcasm i guess.. ^^ | ||
|
mdb
Bulgaria4059 Posts
| ||
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
In the last game, Casy worked his magic, but couldn't outmacro Nada on 5 gas vs himself on 3 You say this as if the fates themselves conspired to put Nada on 5 gas to start off with and Casy 3. Who do you think was responsible for NaDa holding onto 5 gas while Casy only had 3? Honestly, all of you guys are being blinded by fanboyism. Not just MagicPhil, but Orome and Day too. Casy won 2/3 of the games that made it to midlate game, but that's only because he sucked hard in game 2 and couldn't even make it to a level midgame. NaDa won 2/3 of his games based on his early aggression, something that only proves that he is a better microer and simply better decisionmaker early game. And please don't say "Well NaDa won game 2 only because Casy sucked, and Casy won game 4 when Nada played well." That sounds like something out of the mouth of a shitty USEast pub. NaDa played better game 1 & 2 (Casy definitely could have defended better game 1 and microed better game 2); Casy played better game 3 & 4; NaDa played better game 5. That's all there is to it. Drawing comparisons between games and extrapolating performances is silly and meaningless. Especially in TvT, where minute little things have such huge ramifications later in the game, it's hard to compare these performances and you can twist it any way you want and provide a million different interpretations. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:11 MaGic~PhiL wrote: So u said i got fanboyish and too emotional. So again the question arises : Are u some kind of magician who can see me now typing this ? DO you have any clue which expression im having on my face while writing this ? Do you really think i get angry or mad if someone writes an other opinion than i do ? Im not emotional at all, i m just stating some opinions. Read your posts on the last few pages again, you get sarcastic, instead of arguing back you start to exaggerate what I'm saying. Anyway, I'm through arguing with you, you do not even make an effort to actually argue about the games in detail, your argument is confined mostly to 'Nada won, so he must be the better player'. | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
Think of what the PR is, how players are ranked, and why his statement that Nada can become #2 is not stupid given his information. There are so many thoughts in between you are missing just to slam the dude... I believe in forum language they call it trolling or ogreing or somethign and it's considered assinine. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
If NaDa wins vs Savior in the finals , then it was Savior wanting to put NaDa at 4 OSL titles, because they are good buddies, after all.. PhiL edit : 2000 D: | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:16 MaGic~PhiL wrote: Art Out of your mouth the sentence : Stop being bitter and twisting things. Im really laughing my ass of right now. The guy who says Casy was better, NaDa was lucky, Casy deserved to win. Casy understand TvT better than Nada, THe guy who said Nadas strategic skills are bad compared to casys, the guy who basicaly cant accept NaDa > Casy in this series and almost pretends as if Casy won the series says this sentence. This is pure sarcasm i guess.. ^^ ....Casy IS better at TvT this was a great series but he's pretty much right, Nada got build order lucky on Arkanoid in game 1, outmicrod Casy in game 2 with a surprise attack. Game 3, Casy made the most of a dire situation and pulled out a win through overall superior play. Game 4, Casy absolutely destroyed Nada in every sense of the word. Game 5 was a close battle, but Casy is not as good at expo timing on Arkanoid as Nada is. It's completely fair to say that Nada's win was made easier by having Arkanoid twice, and its completely fair to say Casy's TvT is better, because it is. Both players played exceedingly well in this series, but that doesn't make certain truths untrue. | ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
1. achievement 2. skill 3. looks ( Not sure about this one actually) 4. teeth 5. height 6. number of fans 7. salary 8. personality 9. sex Losers remain silent. FIN | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
I NEVER DOUBT ABOUT YOUR WIN!!  But... please! Next time do 3-0... and don't give me a heartattack 3-2 T.T! | ||
|
One Page Memory
Bulgaria2145 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:18 mdb wrote: LOL . I can imagine what will happen if NaDa wins Saviour in the final. He'll have 4 badges. | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:22 1tym wrote: 4. teeth 5. height hahahaha | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:22 1tym wrote: Nada >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Casy in every aspect. 1. achievement 2. skill 3. looks ( Not sure about this one actually) 4. teeth 5. height 6. number of fans 7. salary 8. personality 9. sex Losers remain silent. FIN Hahaha, Casy fans got owned T.T #2 is arguable, but at best, we win 2 out of 9 -_-;; | ||
|
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:22 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: ....Casy IS better at TvT this was a great series but he's pretty much right, Nada got build order lucky on Arkanoid in game 1, outmicrod Casy in game 2 with a surprise attack. Game 3, Casy made the most of a dire situation and pulled out a win through overall superior play. Game 4, Casy absolutely destroyed Nada in every sense of the word. Game 5 was a close battle, but Casy is not as good at expo timing on Arkanoid as Nada is. It's completely fair to say that Nada's win was made easier by having Arkanoid twice, and its completely fair to say Casy's TvT is better, because it is. Both players played exceedingly well in this series, but that doesn't make certain truths untrue. The ability to end a game quickly shouldn't reflect poorly upon a person's TvT skill. Maybe you can say that Casy's TvT appeared to be more impressive than that of NaDa's, but there is no real basis to say that Casy's TvT is better based on today's games - and a little unfair to NaDa, who after all won the TvT series. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
And i dont really care , if NaDa won it or if Casy lost it , because u can always say it wasnt the skills of the guy who won, but the faults of the guy who lost. If just find it ridicolous that u basicaly say im not bringing any facts, while you are making statements which are just totally unproven and strange.. Like saying Casy understand TvT better than NaDa ( plz explain me how u come to that conclusion) Nadas strategic skills are not as good as Cas'ys ( plz explain me how u come to that conclusion) I will stop posting any sarcastic statements as soon as u provide me with answer that at least show some contet of truth, because i know u cant really answer these statements , because they are simply not true and IF , then no one could ever now except god. | ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
|
sephiroth85
New Zealand87 Posts
| ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
On February 14 2007 05:29 CTStalker wrote: Agreed with GI's post, also, it's absurd to say that one player was lucky to draw a particular map in a mirror matchup. The implied advantage here stems not from luck, but from skill if this map played such a decisive role. If Federer played Nadal on a randomly chosen surface, would Nadal not be lucky if sand was the picked one? | ||
| ||
