EPTOn February 07 2007 03:04 Blind wrote:
Show nested quote +
Where in my post did I flame you?On February 07 2007 03:00 nova_442 wrote:
I wasn't the one that started this flamefest. You can thank siro) for that. It should be obvious what I meant initially and it hardly warrants a response like I received. I'm more than happy to fire back though :p
On February 07 2007 02:58 Blind wrote:
On February 07 2007 02:54 nova_442 wrote:
Read the million posts about this before you post yourself, thanks.
I was typing this as the new posts came in. I read them over and still don't really see anything to disprove what I said. You should take a lesson in manners though.On February 07 2007 02:53 Blind wrote:
If you're a zerg player, you might not understand just how hard it is to control an army vs swarm. Whatever you said about playing west pubbies with better micro isn't a good point unless those pubbies also had Nada's macro while performing better micro.
If nada focused more on the battles and would therefore win more of them, he'd also have less time to macro and less units. So, it's a trade-off and he took the macro route. I'd be amaze at any progamer who can macro as well as nada did that game and still pull off better micro.
That said, I don't think Nada's micro was too bad. He did some nice maneuvers, distracting yarn. Evn if he loss some units with that micro, he was still up because he had the income to do it. Yarnc on the other hand, was playing a low econ game. Sure, one time he had 4 bases, but a few seconds later, a marine raid killed all the drones off of one of the bases. So by harassing yarnc so much, nada prevented him from taking any more bases.
If you're a zerg player, you might not understand just how hard it is to control an army vs swarm. Whatever you said about playing west pubbies with better micro isn't a good point unless those pubbies also had Nada's macro while performing better micro.
If nada focused more on the battles and would therefore win more of them, he'd also have less time to macro and less units. So, it's a trade-off and he took the macro route. I'd be amaze at any progamer who can macro as well as nada did that game and still pull off better micro.
That said, I don't think Nada's micro was too bad. He did some nice maneuvers, distracting yarn. Evn if he loss some units with that micro, he was still up because he had the income to do it. Yarnc on the other hand, was playing a low econ game. Sure, one time he had 4 bases, but a few seconds later, a marine raid killed all the drones off of one of the bases. So by harassing yarnc so much, nada prevented him from taking any more bases.
Read the million posts about this before you post yourself, thanks.
I wasn't the one that started this flamefest. You can thank siro) for that. It should be obvious what I meant initially and it hardly warrants a response like I received. I'm more than happy to fire back though :p
JLIG yo. Or if you insist send me a PM if you want to continue.
