EPTOn November 25 2013 13:18 Golgotha wrote:
No. You do not have to be a very very good player or progamer to edit. There are many players who are nowhere near the mechanical ability of top players but they understand how pros play and what the modern meta game looks like. If only top players or pros could edit, almost no one could edit. Also, the small BW community cannot afford to be picky about who is qualified and who is not. obviously D players should be careful about what they edit, but I am all for having a C rank player make modern changes to the strategy section than having outdated info from 2+ years back. I'd rather have new content that the current community can discuss and even argue about if it is wrong, than seeing nothing happening on Liquipedia.
@Thanks Gecko!
No. You do not have to be a very very good player or progamer to edit. There are many players who are nowhere near the mechanical ability of top players but they understand how pros play and what the modern meta game looks like. If only top players or pros could edit, almost no one could edit. Also, the small BW community cannot afford to be picky about who is qualified and who is not. obviously D players should be careful about what they edit, but I am all for having a C rank player make modern changes to the strategy section than having outdated info from 2+ years back. I'd rather have new content that the current community can discuss and even argue about if it is wrong, than seeing nothing happening on Liquipedia.
@Thanks Gecko!
Realistically you can be D and know what to do, which is the beauty of BW, sure i can say, i can go siege expo and not die to 10/15 gate or something. Or Protoss is taking a fast 3rd, i should timing push before his gateways are up, but actually being good enough to do it is a completely diff story from knowing how to do it.
You could be D and provide a wealth of information, but cant execute it because you arent good enough basically.
