EPTOn May 18 2009 04:04 SonuvBob wrote:
Wk Traded Acquired Pt+-
4 Air Force ACE Woongjin Stars -6
Whyyyyyyyyyyy
Wk Traded Acquired Pt+-
4 Air Force ACE Woongjin Stars -6
Whyyyyyyyyyyy
Hahaha.
Baby > Guemchi
[Fantasy] PL R4 Daily Blog - Page 38
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
Hahaha. Baby > Guemchi | ||
]343[
United States10328 Posts
wow awesome gif there | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
| ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
| ||
|
Yiruru
Canada690 Posts
On May 18 2009 04:34 klizzer wrote: I kinda blew my chances when I traded Stork for Nada, that was a horrible mistake. Oh well, I'll look forward to the next season. Wk ▲Traded Acquired Pt ± 2 HoGiL NaDa -19 | ||
|
Rostam
United States2552 Posts
My Horang2 -> Flash and Pure -> Casy trades this week didn't...work out so well.. Luckily my GuemChi -> Backho and Light -> Jaedong trades from last week are doing great! | ||
|
nibbles
United Kingdom179 Posts
| ||
|
DoX.)
Singapore6164 Posts
| ||
|
doubleupgradeobbies!
Australia1304 Posts
 .Well, I still have 2 more players playing tomorrow, both with not particularly hard opponents (guemchi playing casy lol). Hoping for them not to epic fail so I come out of this week ahead :D | ||
|
~chut~
France1317 Posts
| ||
|
Cesar2000
Sweden185 Posts
| ||
|
ZBiR
Poland1092 Posts
On May 20 2009 00:56 ~chut~ wrote: The points system is a little weird this round though, i don't understand why Hyvaa scored 9 points today while Jaedong only scored 8 yesterday... It's getting to difficult to follow ! He got 9 this week, 4 for match vs CJ and 5 today. | ||
|
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
worst trade? | ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
Anti team: 1 Shine[kaL] hyvaa 5 -20 (1 point worse) Note that the misc tab right now is only showing trades made by more than 1 person so there might be some worse trades that aren't showing up. | ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
| ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
If everybody is required to buy a team, they should be cheaper, or maybe we should get 2 to 4 more starting credits next round to compensate. I like having some credits left after selecting a team. | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
| ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On May 20 2009 22:29 Scorch wrote: Will teams be costed according to their current trade values? That's incredibly expensive. Teams' trade values are inflated by 70% from their original cost. (sum of trade values / sum of costs) If everybody is required to buy a team, they should be cheaper, or maybe we should get 2 to 4 more starting credits next round to compensate. I like having some credits left after selecting a team. The ratio of points scored to costs needs to be adjusted for teams, their price range will be similar to what it was at the beginning of this round. Team trade value for this round was just using the same constant as players (which results in inflated trade values but its fine since its all relative). So look forward to around a 40% (rough estimate) reduction in team costs. It should be something like WeMade 2, SKT 7 for the high and low costs. | ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
On May 21 2009 02:13 Abydos1 wrote: The ratio of points scored to costs needs to be adjusted for teams, their price range will be similar to what it was at the beginning of this round. Team trade value for this round was just using the same constant as players (which results in inflated trade values but its fine since its all relative). So look forward to around a 40% (rough estimate) reduction in team costs. It should be something like WeMade 2, SKT 7 for the high and low costs. Sounds reasonable. Thanks! | ||
|
Cesar2000
Sweden185 Posts
On May 21 2009 02:13 Abydos1 wrote: The ratio of points scored to costs needs to be adjusted for teams, their price range will be similar to what it was at the beginning of this round. Team trade value for this round was just using the same constant as players (which results in inflated trade values but its fine since its all relative). So look forward to around a 40% (rough estimate) reduction in team costs. It should be something like WeMade 2, SKT 7 for the high and low costs. If you're doing this you need to reduce how many points teams give by the same amount or the more expensive teams will be significantly better value. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/4029/1242390357052.gif)
