• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:37
CEST 22:37
KST 05:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 768 users

Data analysis on 8 million games - Page 2

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
ggsimida
Profile Joined August 2015
1148 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 10:38:45
October 11 2023 10:37 GMT
#21
On October 11 2023 18:11 angry_maia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 16:41 Dante08 wrote:
Thanks this is amazing!

This sort of solidifies the fact TvP is the hardest matchup. There are so many ways Terran can die to Protoss in the early-mid game but not the other way around. Once the game goes past 20 mins it gets favoured for Protoss again due to the number of bases Protoss has and the option to switch to carriers.

If you run it at the top level I would think the early-mid game win rates for Protoss lowers abit but overall it wouldn’t change too much.


i dont disagree that TvP is the hardest, but this data doesn't really prove that. All of your arguments equally apply to PvZ (easy to die early, and then zerg pulls ahead again in the late game).


not equally. the winrate bump in the 10-20th ish min for protoss in PvZ is clearly way more pronounced than the terran one in PvT. terran's "compensation" through their 2/3 base timing push in TvP is seemingly not as effective as protoss's 2 base pushes in PvZ.

its actually surprising to me how for all the crying about hydra busts protoss have their own hydra bust esque win spike in the early stage of PvT. even with toss early game shenanigans i never thought it would be just as bad
ggsimida
Profile Joined August 2015
1148 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 10:41:07
October 11 2023 10:40 GMT
#22
On October 11 2023 19:14 RJBTV wrote:
I've noticed post 40 PvZ protoss becomes extremely resource efficient compared to zerg as the map mines out and toss gets a chance to use reavers, archons, and high templars to defend their last couple bases at a very very low cost. The zerg on the other hand has to spam large volumes of units trying to break into a fortified position with units that die in the blink of an eye.


yeah ultra lategame PvZ is known to be heavily toss favoured for the general reasons u mention but i guess theres not enough sample size
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
October 11 2023 10:54 GMT
#23
On October 11 2023 16:41 Dante08 wrote:

This sort of solidifies the fact TvP is the hardest matchup..


It does nothing of the sort, lol
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 11:18:36
October 11 2023 11:14 GMT
#24
You guys have to reserve all the balance discussion or which matchup is harderst sort of things until the analysis with regard to player skill comes out.

For example, even without this data we already know Protoss dominates at almost every level until S rank. Even BSL is dominated by Protoss.

its actually surprising to me how for all the crying about hydra busts protoss have their own hydra bust esque win spike in the early stage of PvT. even with toss early game shenanigans i never thought it would be just as bad

Another example, the near 70% win rate around 3-4 minutes in PvT could very well be about Terran noobs not being able to handle the first Zealots lol. I don't think there are a lot of pro games where the games end that soon.
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 14:42:16
October 11 2023 11:22 GMT
#25
Also another thing to consider: I don't think the data from repmastered.app contains much of the progamers/Korean portion. The spon games between progamers are custom games which are held between themselves that even cwal.gg can't have access. Only recently do we have access to progamers' replays when they clash with each other on the ladder.
ggsimida
Profile Joined August 2015
1148 Posts
October 11 2023 11:24 GMT
#26
On October 11 2023 20:14 TMNT wrote:

Another example, the near 70% win rate around 3-4 minutes in PvT could very well be about Terran noobs not being able to handle the first Zealots lol. I don't think there are a lot of pro games where the games end that soon.


yes i know i mean thats the point, if u are talking about ANY game balance u have to care about the lower levels not just pro levels. how to get people to buy your games or have a community if u don't care that the effort reward ratio is disproportionately skewed in early game TvP just like in ZvP? or i guess thats a moot point for old dead BW? if u lot are just boomers not wanting to make concessions then fine done.
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
October 11 2023 11:58 GMT
#27
On October 11 2023 20:24 ggsimida wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 20:14 TMNT wrote:

Another example, the near 70% win rate around 3-4 minutes in PvT could very well be about Terran noobs not being able to handle the first Zealots lol. I don't think there are a lot of pro games where the games end that soon.


yes i know i mean thats the point, if u are talking about ANY game balance u have to care about the lower levels not just pro levels. how to get people to buy your games or have a community if u don't care that the effort reward ratio is disproportionately skewed in early game TvP just like in ZvP? or i guess thats a moot point for old dead BW? if u lot are just boomers not wanting to make concessions then fine done.

I mean, you're kind of confusing between points here.

If you want to care about lower levels and how to get people to buy the game, then you're talking about DESIGNING the game. It was already done 25 years ago and through several patches later. It can't be changed. It is what it is now.

Then if we are TALKING about balance alone, as in we're just discussing the game, you can either talk about it as a whole or talk about it at a specific level. And most of the times we're implicitly talking about it at high levels (like when we're discussing ASL or something).

Then the point you made about hydra bust in PvZ being comparable to the P win spike in early game PvT, well it's not comparable at all, since the former exists at high levels (maybe even at all levels?) but the latter only exists at noob levels - and it's not where the discussions are at all.
Kraekkling
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
432 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 12:37:25
October 11 2023 12:30 GMT
#28
On October 11 2023 09:37 Monochromatic wrote:
[...]
I would love to see a ZvZ plot about game length and frequency. What are the odds of lategame ZvZ? It might be interesting to see for other mirrors as well.



Great idea, I'll add those later.


On October 11 2023 18:15 Dakota_Fanning wrote:
Amazing job! Nice stats!

Don't throw away your tools you generated the stats with, as we might repeat this with a bigger dataset, which might also include matchmaking stats I'm gathering recently (e.g. MMR).


No worries! I was hoping for you to say something like this, so in the future we maybe could re-run the replay parser to get more information from the replays and also include MMR ratings.

@ggsimida and TMNT: please wait for the upcoming data which will examine the behaviour in higher-level and lower-level games, it is going to be rather enlightening.

As already mentioned in the thread, currently no MMR information is available, thus we can't just get stats for S-rank. However, I think that the effective APM is sufficiently correlated with skill and rank, so we can use it as a proxy to create a sample of high-level and low-level games.

See here for normalized distributions of effective APM, really beautiful gaussian.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
(*^^)(^*)
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
October 11 2023 12:45 GMT
#29
On October 11 2023 21:30 Kraekkling wrote:
As already mentioned in the thread, currently no MMR information is available, thus we can't just get stats for S-rank. However, I think that the effective APM is sufficiently correlated with skill and rank, so we can use it as a proxy to create a sample of high-level and low-level games.

I am a bit skeptical about that. If you go through cwal.gg you'll probably see B C ranks players having the apm of progamers.

But the guy who runs cwal.gg does have stats for each specific mmr range, it was posted on reddit a while ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/comments/15nvvrk/matchups_by_winrate_including_2300_s_rank/

I suppose maybe you can grab the data for S rank only and extract the win rate vs time from it? Obviously need to contact him to ask for those data though.
Dakota_Fanning *
Profile Joined January 2008
Hungary2349 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 13:14:51
October 11 2023 13:09 GMT
#30
On October 11 2023 21:45 TMNT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 21:30 Kraekkling wrote:
As already mentioned in the thread, currently no MMR information is available, thus we can't just get stats for S-rank. However, I think that the effective APM is sufficiently correlated with skill and rank, so we can use it as a proxy to create a sample of high-level and low-level games.

I am a bit skeptical about that. If you go through cwal.gg you'll probably see B C ranks players having the apm of progamers.

But the guy who runs cwal.gg does have stats for each specific mmr range, it was posted on reddit a while ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/comments/15nvvrk/matchups_by_winrate_including_2300_s_rank/

I suppose maybe you can grab the data for S rank only and extract the win rate vs time from it? Obviously need to contact him to ask for those data though.

I'm also skeptical about the rank-skill correlation. I see many S rank players that have a series of games where opponent leaves early (to artificially push the player up), and I also see many top players leave so they get to low ranks to stomp unskilled players.

While rank (MMR) should be (and probably is) a better indication of skill than APM, it often isn't.
https://repmastered.icza.net
EndingLife
Profile Blog Joined December 2002
United States1594 Posts
October 11 2023 13:15 GMT
#31
Great work. I'd love to see the same data with only S rank and above filtered.
Kraekkling
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
432 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 13:22:30
October 11 2023 13:16 GMT
#32
On October 11 2023 21:45 TMNT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 21:30 Kraekkling wrote:
As already mentioned in the thread, currently no MMR information is available, thus we can't just get stats for S-rank. However, I think that the effective APM is sufficiently correlated with skill and rank, so we can use it as a proxy to create a sample of high-level and low-level games.

I am a bit skeptical about that. If you go through cwal.gg you'll probably see B C ranks players having the apm of progamers.

But the guy who runs cwal.gg does have stats for each specific mmr range, it was posted on reddit a while ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/comments/15nvvrk/matchups_by_winrate_including_2300_s_rank/

I suppose maybe you can grab the data for S rank only and extract the win rate vs time from it? Obviously need to contact him to ask for those data though.


You're right that there are players and games at B and C rank with the apm of programers.

I also looked at the apm distributions - those had a much more prominent tail at the high end of the distribution with entries at the 500-600 apm range, which is obviously due to spam. I don't have the plot at hand right now but I might post it later. In short: it didn't look pretty and you could see that there is a lot of spam going on. The effective apm distributions are much cleaner though, as can be seen in the post above.

I don't think this is the perfect way to do it - but it seems reasonable enough to try and see what comes out. It's also probably the best that can be done with the data at hand.

I'd also suggest you might take a look at the games on repmastered.app . I was mostly eyeballing the stats, but to me it seemed reasonable to assume that if we require something like

- both player have an effective apm above 180

we end up with almost exclusively A/S-rank games. Please feel free to suggest any improvements in this regard.

Regarding data from cwal.gg: we might get MMR data added to the current data anyway, once it's there it would be used.
(*^^)(^*)
Dante08
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Singapore4128 Posts
October 11 2023 13:25 GMT
#33
On October 11 2023 20:14 TMNT wrote:
You guys have to reserve all the balance discussion or which matchup is harderst sort of things until the analysis with regard to player skill comes out.

For example, even without this data we already know Protoss dominates at almost every level until S rank. Even BSL is dominated by Protoss.

Show nested quote +
its actually surprising to me how for all the crying about hydra busts protoss have their own hydra bust esque win spike in the early stage of PvT. even with toss early game shenanigans i never thought it would be just as bad

Another example, the near 70% win rate around 3-4 minutes in PvT could very well be about Terran noobs not being able to handle the first Zealots lol. I don't think there are a lot of pro games where the games end that soon.


Yes once you get to the pro level Terrans don’t die as easily but it still happens, I’ve seen it happen in ASL, ultimate battle and various other Korean pro games. Also when you flip it the other way around it’s true at pro level Terran almost never beats Protoss early game.

Now when you sample the absolute top level Terrans like Light Rush etc then things become different but we are not just looking at the absolute top level.

Dante08
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Singapore4128 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 15:25:36
October 11 2023 13:27 GMT
#34
On October 11 2023 19:54 vOdToasT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 16:41 Dante08 wrote:

This sort of solidifies the fact TvP is the hardest matchup..


It does nothing of the sort, lol


Care to explain, the TvP win area is by far the smallest in all matchups

Edit for typo
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 13:48:21
October 11 2023 13:36 GMT
#35
On October 11 2023 22:09 Dakota_Fanning wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2023 21:45 TMNT wrote:
On October 11 2023 21:30 Kraekkling wrote:
As already mentioned in the thread, currently no MMR information is available, thus we can't just get stats for S-rank. However, I think that the effective APM is sufficiently correlated with skill and rank, so we can use it as a proxy to create a sample of high-level and low-level games.

I am a bit skeptical about that. If you go through cwal.gg you'll probably see B C ranks players having the apm of progamers.

But the guy who runs cwal.gg does have stats for each specific mmr range, it was posted on reddit a while ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/comments/15nvvrk/matchups_by_winrate_including_2300_s_rank/

I suppose maybe you can grab the data for S rank only and extract the win rate vs time from it? Obviously need to contact him to ask for those data though.

I'm also skeptical about the rank-skill correlation. I see many S rank players that have a series of games where opponent leaves early (to artificially push the player up), and I also see many top players leave so they get to low ranks to stomp unskilled players.

While rank (MMR) should be (and probably is) a better indication of skill than APM, it often isn't.

It doesn't matter for S rank and above though. S rank players may tank their mmr to stomp noobs, but the accounts in S rank still belong to legitimate S rank players.

A rank players who get accidentally bumped to S by leavers should not be too many. And even if there are a lot of them (I don't think there are though), it's A being mixed up with S which is still fine as far as "high skill" goes (think Artosis hitting 2400 a while ago). But more importantly, it occurs for all 3 races so it auto evens out.

You can't say the same for eapm. It's very normal for C and B ranks players (even D) to have ~ 200 eapm. So using eapm you get B and C mixed up with S.
Kraekkling
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
432 Posts
October 11 2023 13:44 GMT
#36
It's very normal for C and B ranks players (even D) to have ~ 200 eapm.


This is not true. Can you in any way show this claim to be true or quantify what you mean by "very normal"?
(*^^)(^*)
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 14:12:12
October 11 2023 14:05 GMT
#37
On October 11 2023 22:44 Kraekkling wrote:
Show nested quote +
It's very normal for C and B ranks players (even D) to have ~ 200 eapm.


This is not true. Can you in any way show this claim to be true or quantify what you mean by "very normal"?

Okay maybe "normal" is not the right word (as in most of them have 200 eapm) but what I mean is the proportion of lower rank players with high eapm is still large enough to affect the results. Of course I can't verify it with stats but if you just randomly browse the B-C rank sections in cwal you'll see a lot of (Korean) players around 180-200 eapm.

On the opposite side, you may have S rank players with less than 200 eapm too. For example just look at Stork and Soulkey here:
https://cwal.gg/players/gateway/30/player/Stork
https://cwal.gg/players/gateway/30/player/LC_needmoney
these dudes have sub 200 eapm all the time, some games even 160-170 eapm lol.

I'm quite sure that if filtered by eapm, you will leave the Storks and the Soulkeys out of the equation while adding in some random B rank players. At what proportion I dont know but what I'm saying is the data filtered by eapm is not as "clean" as you think.


Kraekkling
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
432 Posts
October 11 2023 14:42 GMT
#38

I'm quite sure that if filtered by eapm, you will leave the Storks and the Soulkeys out of the equation while adding in some random B rank players.


This is obviously true and I can't think of any way to fix this without using MMR data.

Actually, we introduce another bias by applying a requirement on eapm. Since the distributions have different mean values but we impose the same selection for both races (e.g. above 180 eapm), we bias our selection samples for the races.

That is, if the mean is 160eapm for Terran but 150eapm for Zerg, you could say that we impose a higher requirement on the Zerg players and therefore bias our sample towards better Zerg players, compared to the Terran players sample.

There are even more problems to this, depending on how rigorous you'd like to be, but let's ignore that for now.


At what proportion I dont know but what I'm saying is the data filtered by eapm is not as "clean" as you think.


I will refrain from further replying to your posts until I posted the rest of the data, but as I previously mentioned, it is clear that this is not the best way to do it. But it's probably the best way to do it with the available data.
(*^^)(^*)
TMNT
Profile Joined January 2021
2704 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 15:10:47
October 11 2023 15:10 GMT
#39
On October 11 2023 23:42 Kraekkling wrote:
I will refrain from further replying to your posts until I posted the rest of the data, but as I previously mentioned, it is clear that this is not the best way to do it. But it's probably the best way to do it with the available data.

Yes of course. If you can't have mmr data this is obviously the best way, if not the only way, to filter player skill. It would also be interesting if, once you can get access to the mmr data, to redo it for mmr and compare both sets of results.

And may also be interesting to do a mmr vs eapm comparison as well, although it should be more or less a positve correlation anyway, except from A/S rank it would probably flatten out.
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10009 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-10-11 21:51:14
October 11 2023 15:27 GMT
#40
yes well the problem is eAPM is also a flawed measure in BW which can easily be spammed, it has to do with unit movement/attack commands (protoss has less of this so their eAPM is usually less than t/z), so a zerg player will normally have more eAPM just because they're constantly microing mutas etc., basically the more time you spend on your units the higher your eAPM will be, at high lvls thats fine because progamers will also macro but at lower lvls that data is flawed because many players will sacrifice their macro for that... but i guess it's better than nothing

to me a sample size of like ~1k hand picked games of high lvl players is worth way more than that type of data

the thing about BW is you can't really unlock the "true form" of the game until you hit a certain lvl of execution, any data before that is pretty meaningless (that said it's still interesting to see the trends among all skill lvls) because it snowballs into the later stages of the game from a flawed state

to put it in perspective, imo even 2500 KR ladder players are playing a different game than the progamers are, 2500 (this number changes depending on the ladder season, in general it's around this range tho) is sort of the starting point of competitive BW play
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 159
JuggernautJason155
BRAT_OK 59
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 573
TY 169
Aegong 30
JulyZerg 9
Dota 2
capcasts230
League of Legends
Grubby3586
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K667
oskar191
flusha83
taco 49
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude3
Mew2King1
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu633
Other Games
tarik_tv5419
FrodaN2656
summit1g2360
Hui .278
Trikslyr60
Sick49
PPMD40
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 26
• StrangeGG 22
• poizon28 21
• tFFMrPink 19
• LUISG 15
• Adnapsc2 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 18
• 80smullet 16
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22538
League of Legends
• Doublelift3553
Other Games
• imaqtpie1187
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
13h 23m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
17h 23m
CSO Cup
19h 23m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
21h 23m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 12h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.