![[image loading]](http://cgi.chollian.net/~dukkha18/jhspboard/id/upload/files/fallen_of_carrier_by_phungdinhdung.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://cgi.chollian.net/~dukkha18/jhspboard/id/upload/screen_shot/ah1.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://cgi.chollian.net/~dukkha18/jhspboard/id/upload/screen_shot/ah3.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://cgi.chollian.net/~dukkha18/jhspboard/id/upload/files/ah2.gif)
![[image loading]](http://cgi.chollian.net/~dukkha18/jhspboard/id/upload/files/ah4.jpg)
have fun!
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
My_Digital_Toss
Korea (South)267 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() have fun! | ||
|
RaGe
Belgium9949 Posts
| ||
|
aaro
United States228 Posts
looked like those gols were going to lose.. but wow go boxer! | ||
|
Nyovne
Netherlands19135 Posts
On May 10 2007 12:04 RaGe wrote: rofl that protoss suit ^ Need and rofl @ the overmilkedoutboxerpicwithhisfaceinthepielol! | ||
|
pum
Sweden306 Posts
| ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
NokCha
Korea (South)410 Posts
| ||
|
gameguard
Korea (South)2132 Posts
| ||
|
OMFGlearntoplay
32 Posts
1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). | ||
|
OMFGlearntoplay
32 Posts
1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). | ||
|
XDawn
Canada4040 Posts
| ||
|
OMFGlearntoplay
32 Posts
On May 10 2007 12:40 gameguard wrote: I would think mutalisk attack would help more than armor in fighting gols. Am I wrong? Muta attack seems better to me... armor wouldnt be as helpful with the +4 increment upgrades for gol anti air. | ||
|
istealhotelsoap
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25988 Posts
Anyways that was crazy, if I was Savior I would have pressed on too, it looks like Zerg is going to win that battle convincingly and then with that little micro the entire battle reversed. | ||
|
LxRogue
United States1415 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
And jesus, that first pic of gols v carriers is amazing~~ | ||
|
niceplayer
United States238 Posts
It's crazy that goliath doesn't have the range weakness typical massed ground units have cus of charon booster, while mutalisks, though air, do. | ||
|
zurg
1923 Posts
awesome goliath micro | ||
|
EAGER-beaver
Canada2799 Posts
| ||
|
il0seonpurpose
Korea (South)5638 Posts
| ||
|
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_-he won that game... | ||
|
Storchen
Sweden4385 Posts
On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() | ||
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() He didn't lose the game, but his team did lose the match. | ||
|
abandonallhope
Sweden563 Posts
| ||
|
Obi-1.Kulinobi
Czech Republic162 Posts
midas???? | ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
According to yakii's thread: 2007-05-09 (Wednesday), 14:00 was the date | ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
![]() | ||
|
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
Yakii's VOD thread in the featured threads section. There are direct downloads for most of the games played. | ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
![]() | ||
|
Ganfei1
China667 Posts
Great gol micro, I was thinking there was no way he could win | ||
|
anch
United States5457 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
First pic of gol vs carriers is awesome. | ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
it seems that once terran gets enough gols, nothing the zerg throws at them matters. mutas are getting hit by the gols in the back of the blob, and lings can only attack the front row boxer didn't make any vessels, which was interesting... he had an expo without a refinery on the geyser, so gas wasn't the issue | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
|
fookyou
Canada351 Posts
| ||
|
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
I also remember that 1st picture that was submitted to a contest. It didn't win but a lot of people here said that it was really good. | ||
|
sOnagi[3.33]
Korea (South)886 Posts
| ||
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
On May 10 2007 16:22 thedeadhaji wrote: who's the creator of the first pic? =O Phun Dinh Dung. Atleast, according to the name of the img. | ||
|
Tarte
Canada933 Posts
second one isn't much of any kind of art :O! Maybe.. the art of making peaple laughing out loud =_= | ||
|
mel_ee
2448 Posts
On May 10 2007 16:22 thedeadhaji wrote: who's the creator of the first pic? =O http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/44323950/?q=Fallen Carrier&qh=boost:popular age_sigma:24h age_scale:5 thats his deviant art. I believe he made it for a blizzard contest but didnt win. tt - its such a good piece that I wouldnt mind putting a poster like one on my wall. | ||
|
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... | ||
|
ATeddyBear
Canada2843 Posts
| ||
|
LibertyTerran
Vietnam711 Posts
On May 10 2007 16:25 Jyvblamo wrote: Phun Dinh Dung. Atleast, according to the name of the img. Sounds like a Vietnamese name for me :/ | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
On May 10 2007 19:19 MaZza[KIS] wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... This weird, pathetic attempt to define what a nerd is makes you a huge mega nerd. OWNED.^.GG.^. But seriously dude if you actually want an argument: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) nerd –noun Slang. 1. a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd. American Heritage Dictionary - nerd also nurd (nûrd) n. Slang 1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person. 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by the second definition. However, the second definition doesn't imply any negativity (except for the socially inept part which is debatable -Midas lol-) like the first one does so just because someone is labeled a nerd doesn't mean it has to have a bad connotation to it. The fact that I took the time to make this post probably makes me a nerd also somehow but I'm okay with it ~_~ | ||
|
Gandalf
Pakistan1905 Posts
They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
On May 10 2007 20:19 Gandalf wrote: How are Starcraft pros nerds by the second definition? Or by any of those definitions? They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? I never said the first definition applied to them at all. They are most definitely single-minded and obsessed in what they do, spending hours and hours of practice a day playing starcraft. I never said they are socially inept. I said it was debatable, which means plenty of them are and plenty of them aren't but if all you do almost every single day is practice, eat, and sleep then you will probably be a bit socially inept, or at least more so than most people. Starcraft is most definitely a nonsocial activity. You are practicing and playing against others but this isn't using any social skills. Chatting with your teammates about strategy also doesn't help much with social skills. In fact if you want to be one of the best pros you better NOT have a girlfriend. The argument that because Starcraft is a job and not just a hobby is somewhat arguable but the fact is almost none of them make much money from starcraft, let alone $100k+. Only the top players can make a good living off starcraft and the top players are probably some of the biggest "nerds" of them, i.e. they are more obsessed with the game and they spend less time on social activities like girlfriends and more time on practicing, which makes them the best. But just because it is a payable job for some doesn't make them less of a nerd. Someone who writes computer programming 8 hours a day could probably be labeled a nerd too, even if he has a girlfriend or even a wife. Like I said, being called a nerd isn't a bad thing, at least I don't think it is. People who socialize a lot and never get obsessed over certain things never do anything great. Nerds are who are remembered in the history books more often than not. edit: If you want to say Starcraft is not a hobby that's fine, but it's definitely a pursuit, which is part of the definition. | ||
|
il0seonpurpose
Korea (South)5638 Posts
On May 10 2007 13:24 Jyvblamo wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() He didn't lose the game, but his team did lose the match. are u sure he won that game? | ||
|
mistapooh
United States376 Posts
| ||
|
Locked
United States4182 Posts
On May 10 2007 20:47 il0seonpurpose wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 13:24 Jyvblamo wrote: On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() He didn't lose the game, but his team did lose the match. are u sure he won that game? yes wtf thanks for the link MDT! i watched the live stream and it was amazing | ||
|
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
On May 10 2007 19:59 boghat wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 19:19 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... This weird, pathetic attempt to define what a nerd is makes you a huge mega nerd. OWNED.^.GG.^. But seriously dude if you actually want an argument: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) nerd –noun Slang. 1. a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd. American Heritage Dictionary - nerd also nurd (nûrd) n. Slang 1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person. 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by the second definition. However, the second definition doesn't imply any negativity (except for the socially inept part which is debatable -Midas lol-) like the first one does so just because someone is labeled a nerd doesn't mean it has to have a bad connotation to it. The fact that I took the time to make this post probably makes me a nerd also somehow but I'm okay with it ~_~ Usually I would not reply.. but.. your post proved MY point.. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd .. non-social hobby... awwww... heat to tell ya but sc is QUITE social. It has online communities, team leagues and individual leagues. If you wanna call bw players nerds then you have to call pro atheletes nerds as well 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. hmmm.. I dont know about you but most pros go partying, do interviews and have other activities outside of progaming that require social aptitude. Sorry but most of these guys are just SMART and/or DIFFERENT. But that doesn't make them nerds because they're not socially inept and they're not obessed with a non-social hobby. They are part of a LARGE community, they get interviewed and they have a status of "pro athelete". GJ on owning yurself tho. No really. Highlighted my point even better. </ rant 2> | ||
|
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
On May 10 2007 20:46 boghat wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 20:19 Gandalf wrote: How are Starcraft pros nerds by the second definition? Or by any of those definitions? They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? I never said the first definition applied to them at all. They are most definitely single-minded and obsessed in what they do, spending hours and hours of practice a day playing starcraft. I never said they are socially inept. I said it was debatable, which means plenty of them are and plenty of them aren't but if all you do almost every single day is practice, eat, and sleep then you will probably be a bit socially inept, or at least more so than most people. Starcraft is most definitely a nonsocial activity. You are practicing and playing against others but this isn't using any social skills. Chatting with your teammates about strategy also doesn't help much with social skills. In fact if you want to be one of the best pros you better NOT have a girlfriend. The argument that because Starcraft is a job and not just a hobby is somewhat arguable but the fact is almost none of them make much money from starcraft, let alone $100k+. Only the top players can make a good living off starcraft and the top players are probably some of the biggest "nerds" of them, i.e. they are more obsessed with the game and they spend less time on social activities like girlfriends and more time on practicing, which makes them the best. But just because it is a payable job for some doesn't make them less of a nerd. Someone who writes computer programming 8 hours a day could probably be labeled a nerd too, even if he has a girlfriend or even a wife. Like I said, being called a nerd isn't a bad thing, at least I don't think it is. People who socialize a lot and never get obsessed over certain things never do anything great. Nerds are who are remembered in the history books more often than not. edit: If you want to say Starcraft is not a hobby that's fine, but it's definitely a pursuit, which is part of the definition. ROFL.. Missed this. I know plenty of ppl who are programmers that don't even TOUCH computers at home. It seems to me that you definition of nerd is IN FACT computer nerd. And your definition of computer nerd is ANYONE who spends excessive amounts of time on the computer. But that's simply not true. If it was then the whole world would be nerds because they have obsessions with mobile phones, phones (on general), TVs. Hell.. everyone who uses anything to excess is a nerd. In fact, sir, your warped sense of what a nerd is is shaped by a stereotype of the genuine computer geek, which none of these guys are. Please... save yourself further embaressment. | ||
|
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
On May 10 2007 20:46 boghat wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 20:19 Gandalf wrote: How are Starcraft pros nerds by the second definition? Or by any of those definitions? They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? I never said the first definition applied to them at all. They are most definitely single-minded and obsessed in what they do, spending hours and hours of practice a day playing starcraft. I never said they are socially inept. I said it was debatable, which means plenty of them are and plenty of them aren't but if all you do almost every single day is practice, eat, and sleep then you will probably be a bit socially inept, or at least more so than most people. Starcraft is most definitely a nonsocial activity. You are practicing and playing against others but this isn't using any social skills. Chatting with your teammates about strategy also doesn't help much with social skills. In fact if you want to be one of the best pros you better NOT have a girlfriend. The argument that because Starcraft is a job and not just a hobby is somewhat arguable but the fact is almost none of them make much money from starcraft, let alone $100k+. Only the top players can make a good living off starcraft and the top players are probably some of the biggest "nerds" of them, i.e. they are more obsessed with the game and they spend less time on social activities like girlfriends and more time on practicing, which makes them the best. But just because it is a payable job for some doesn't make them less of a nerd. Someone who writes computer programming 8 hours a day could probably be labeled a nerd too, even if he has a girlfriend or even a wife. Like I said, being called a nerd isn't a bad thing, at least I don't think it is. People who socialize a lot and never get obsessed over certain things never do anything great. Nerds are who are remembered in the history books more often than not. edit: If you want to say Starcraft is not a hobby that's fine, but it's definitely a pursuit, which is part of the definition. quit posting nerd! :p Staying at ur computer browsing TL.net! Socially inept! BOOH! ~_~ | ||
|
intelinside
United States982 Posts
| ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
On May 10 2007 21:07 MaZza[KIS] wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 20:46 boghat wrote: On May 10 2007 20:19 Gandalf wrote: How are Starcraft pros nerds by the second definition? Or by any of those definitions? They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? I never said the first definition applied to them at all. They are most definitely single-minded and obsessed in what they do, spending hours and hours of practice a day playing starcraft. I never said they are socially inept. I said it was debatable, which means plenty of them are and plenty of them aren't but if all you do almost every single day is practice, eat, and sleep then you will probably be a bit socially inept, or at least more so than most people. Starcraft is most definitely a nonsocial activity. You are practicing and playing against others but this isn't using any social skills. Chatting with your teammates about strategy also doesn't help much with social skills. In fact if you want to be one of the best pros you better NOT have a girlfriend. The argument that because Starcraft is a job and not just a hobby is somewhat arguable but the fact is almost none of them make much money from starcraft, let alone $100k+. Only the top players can make a good living off starcraft and the top players are probably some of the biggest "nerds" of them, i.e. they are more obsessed with the game and they spend less time on social activities like girlfriends and more time on practicing, which makes them the best. But just because it is a payable job for some doesn't make them less of a nerd. Someone who writes computer programming 8 hours a day could probably be labeled a nerd too, even if he has a girlfriend or even a wife. Like I said, being called a nerd isn't a bad thing, at least I don't think it is. People who socialize a lot and never get obsessed over certain things never do anything great. Nerds are who are remembered in the history books more often than not. edit: If you want to say Starcraft is not a hobby that's fine, but it's definitely a pursuit, which is part of the definition. ROFL.. Missed this. I know plenty of ppl who are programmers that don't even TOUCH computers at home. It seems to me that you definition of nerd is IN FACT computer nerd. And your definition of computer nerd is ANYONE who spends excessive amounts of time on the computer. But that's simply not true. If it was then the whole world would be nerds because they have obsessions with mobile phones, phones (on general), TVs. Hell.. everyone who uses anything to excess is a nerd. In fact, sir, your warped sense of what a nerd is is shaped by a stereotype of the genuine computer geek, which none of these guys are. Please... save yourself further embaressment. This is my last post on this topic but only because you debate in a very immature way and can't help but add insults to your posts to make up for the lack of substance. You just assume my definition of nerd is a computer nerd for some reason because I gave another example that used a computer. The fact is a large majority of jobs use a computer in some way so it would be harder to use an example that didn't use one. Your arguments follow weird trains of logic. You decide that because you think I think everyone who uses electronic equipment a lot is a nerd (I never said this) anyone that uses anything to excess is a nerd. The social component is an important part of it. And I still think Starcraft is a nonsocial activity. When you are playing serious games you do not socialize at all. Just because you are playing another person doesn't make it inherently social. Pros practice all day doing something where specifically you need to concentrate by yourself to do well at it. Chatting in between games about strategy is socializing but the chatter is usually only about the game at hand. Starcraft pros spend the majority of their days obsessively engaged in a nonsocial activity. Obviously almost everyone will socialize some part of the day so just because they may go out at night doesn't necessarily take away the nerd label. If that was the case I wonder who actually would be labeled a nerd. I guess our disagreement here is the social component of starcraft. I don't think there is much of one on the competitive pro level. To be competitive you have to reject socializing a lot of the time. On the amateur level where Starcraft is just a hobby then I agree it is social. But on the pro level they have to reject a lot of that socializing to practice and remain competitive. If starcraft pros that practice seriously 8+ hours a day (that means not stopping for an hour or two to chat in an online community or with other people which is what you seem to be implying on why Starcraft is social) aren't nerds then who is? Pros do spend the majority of their time pursuing a nonsocial activity (the act of actually playing the game) and this does apply to the definition of nerd. There are only a few, proud nerds who spend 100% of their time on their pursuits and hobbies and never go out with friends; these select few are the uber nerds. Maybe if you can actually make an intelligent post that actually has some real argements in it then I will reply. But if you can't then I'm fine with you having the last word so you can continue to feel superior to my pathetic embarrassing self. | ||
|
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
Okay.. u say "Starcraft pros spend the majority of their days obsessively engaged in a nonsocial activity. Obviously almost everyone will socialize some part of the day so just because they may go out at night doesn't necessarily take away the nerd label. If that was the case I wonder who actually would be labeled a nerd." Alright... Clerk who types up oders on his computer for a day could not socialize Engineers who works out working models all day could not socialize Telemarketers who talks on the phone ironically cannot socialize Hey, stand up comedians cannot socialize because he only speaks to make people laugh, not friends. Oh wait did I mention that for every occupation you spend the majority of your day working hard and not "socializing"? Just because all the busy people go out at night doesn't mean they're not nerds. They spend their entire day obsessed with something unsociable. You just labled everybody as a nerd T_T ~____~ | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
| ||
|
KrAzYfoOL
Australia3037 Posts
On May 10 2007 19:59 boghat wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 19:19 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... This weird, pathetic attempt to define what a nerd is makes you a huge mega nerd. OWNED.^.GG.^. But seriously dude if you actually want an argument: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) nerd –noun Slang. 1. a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd. American Heritage Dictionary - nerd also nurd (nûrd) n. Slang 1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person. 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by the second definition. However, the second definition doesn't imply any negativity (except for the socially inept part which is debatable -Midas lol-) like the first one does so just because someone is labeled a nerd doesn't mean it has to have a bad connotation to it. The fact that I took the time to make this post probably makes me a nerd also somehow but I'm okay with it ~_~ by that logic if ever you call someone a fag, you're reffering to a bundle of sticks. | ||
|
mistapooh
United States376 Posts
| ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
| ||
|
CapO
United States1615 Posts
On May 10 2007 20:46 boghat wrote: Starcraft is most definitely a nonsocial activity. You are practicing and playing against others but this isn't using any social skills. Chatting with your teammates about strategy also doesn't help much with social skills. In fact if you want to be one of the best pros you better NOT have a girlfriend.Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 20:19 Gandalf wrote: How are Starcraft pros nerds by the second definition? Or by any of those definitions? They arent stupid, irritating or blah blah. They arent obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit. Its a job, not a hobby. They make hundreds of thousands of dollars off it. And who says they are socially inept? I never said the first definition applied to them at all. They are most definitely single-minded and obsessed in what they do, spending hours and hours of practice a day playing starcraft. I never said they are socially inept. I said it was debatable, which means plenty of them are and plenty of them aren't but if all you do almost every single day is practice, eat, and sleep then you will probably be a bit socially inept, or at least more so than most people. The argument that because Starcraft is a job and not just a hobby is somewhat arguable but the fact is almost none of them make much money from starcraft, let alone $100k+. Only the top players can make a good living off starcraft and the top players are probably some of the biggest "nerds" of them, i.e. they are more obsessed with the game and they spend less time on social activities like girlfriends and more time on practicing, which makes them the best. But just because it is a payable job for some doesn't make them less of a nerd. Someone who writes computer programming 8 hours a day could probably be labeled a nerd too, even if he has a girlfriend or even a wife. Like I said, being called a nerd isn't a bad thing, at least I don't think it is. People who socialize a lot and never get obsessed over certain things never do anything great. Nerds are who are remembered in the history books more often than not. edit: If you want to say Starcraft is not a hobby that's fine, but it's definitely a pursuit, which is part of the definition. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- you obviously have no idea what koreans are like. more than 95% of the times, koreans don't talk about strategy when they are chatting in channels. i know this because i was in korean guilds ,and i can understand and write korean. their conversation is just a normal conversation about anything, really. in other words, u'll rarely see them talking about their game analysis and whatnot. the korean guild i was in would always hold a monthly meeting with each other, where everyone would go on a camp or something. they'd eat, talk, take pictures, and etc. when the picturse are uploaded on their websites, you can't find anything related to sc in those pictures. some of them talk about how they ended up going to same colleges, and they really hang out and chill. i think ur misconception of sc in korea is due to the fact that ur from different culture. for example, in usa, it's hard to find those "popular ppl" who drink and party playing sc for hours, but in korea, even the most bad ass who can kick anyone's ass in school plays sc obsessively. also i wouldn't call them nerds, because being a sc progamer is a new occupation in korea. how about those who practice other sports like soccer obsessively? bball's a game. sc's a game. they are all sports imo. yes progamers do work out. they spend hours and hours practicing, so they need to have good physical endurance and stuff. | ||
|
Seraphim
United States4467 Posts
| ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
Well I was specifically talking about pro Starcraft teams practicing together in their houses. But obviously I don't know exactly what goes on, only the little that I've seen and read. And I think team sports like soccer and basketball are a lot more social than Starcraft, which is why you could label Starcraft pros nerds and not other pro athletes. Those sports you have to talk and work together as the game is actually going on but in a Starcraft game you have to concentrate fully in your own world, you can't waste time talking to other people as you play the game. Obviously saying all Starcraft pros are nerds is a bit dumb and seems malicious but I was simply presenting one interpretation of the meaning of the word. I'm simply passing the time until the OSL matches tonight; can't wait for them, they should all be great. | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On May 10 2007 12:47 OMFGlearntoplay wrote: I'm sure this is old info, but what is the best key command to "step and fire" with gols or goons? 1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). -_-;; Basic Guide to Microing Land Units: 1. Click away from the attacking unit. 2. Click attack, and hit anywhere. If the attacking unit is far out of range, then your unit will simply move to the place you attack-moved to. Usually moving away and right-clicking on the attacking unit is not a good plan. If you misclick, your unit will move towards the attacker without doing anything. And your cursor has to move a longer distance. I just like to pull back, then hit attack-move to the same exact spot. I don't have to move my cursor and only have to press the "A" key. | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On May 10 2007 19:59 boghat wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 19:19 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... This weird, pathetic attempt to define what a nerd is makes you a huge mega nerd. OWNED.^.GG.^. But seriously dude if you actually want an argument: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) nerd –noun Slang. 1. a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd. American Heritage Dictionary - nerd also nurd (nûrd) n. Slang 1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person. 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by the second definition. However, the second definition doesn't imply any negativity (except for the socially inept part which is debatable -Midas lol-) like the first one does so just because someone is labeled a nerd doesn't mean it has to have a bad connotation to it. The fact that I took the time to make this post probably makes me a nerd also somehow but I'm okay with it ~_~ Wow.... Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by both definitions that you provided. They practice anywhere from 10-14 hours a day on a computer. They definitely don't have the social skills of a normal person who lives a normal life. And they have the single-minded intent of playing Starcraft. Starcraft is a non-social game. Yes, progamers are nerds. What's wrong with calling them nerds? They can't get girls; they wouldn't be able to maintain a relationship without ruining their gaming career; they have little time to spend on how to have healthy social relationships. | ||
|
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
BoxeR/Reach/YellOw I'm sure have 100% success rate -_-; maybe a few others. can't maintain relationships? GORILLA OOV has a girlfriend; they've been together for awhile. | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
| ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On May 10 2007 22:29 LastRomantic wrote: can't get girls? BoxeR/Reach/YellOw I'm sure have 100% success rate -_-; maybe a few others. can't maintain relationships? GORILLA OOV has a girlfriend; they've been together for awhile. What the hell, OOv does not have a girlfriend. Where the crap did you learn that from? -_-;;; If you have been stuck in front of a computer all day long and have been only around male gamers for most of your teenage life, then your social skills are obviously not up to par. It's like asking a middle-schooler to date a college girl and be on the same mental level. Progamers have little experience with girls and relationships and it would be hard for them to jump into one and maintain it effortlessly. Boxer, Reach, Yellow? They look nice, sure. They have lots of money. Yes, they can probably get any girl easily JUST because of those two things: (1) Looks, (2) money. But those two things cannot make up for their lack of experience. They certainly don't look like nerds, and they certainly wouldn't be nerds if they had not played Starcraft at all. But they are nerds, despite what they look like. | ||
|
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
Not sure of now. | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On May 10 2007 22:37 boghat wrote: If you're being sarcastic WhatisProtoss, I said in my other posts that there is nothing wrong with being a nerd. I also never said they couldn't get girls, but I think it definitely might hurt their career if they let their girlfriends get in the way of their practicing. Unless they get cool girlfriends that let them practice all that time every day and don't bitch about it, in which case they probably have a pretty sweet life going. Oh no. I don't mean to say that being a nerd is BAD. I'm a nerd in many ways, as well as everyone on this site. Nothing wrong at all. On May 10 2007 22:44 LastRomantic wrote: as of WCG he had a girlfriend. According to... himself. Maybe he was delusional :x but they have pictures. Not sure of now. He has NOT had a girlfriend. Those pictures are not of his girlfriend. And there are PLENTY of pictures of any progamer with girls. I have plenty too; it doesn't mean I date/like any of them. | ||
|
dropthesky
Canada285 Posts
On May 10 2007 21:51 boghat wrote: I see your point but who is a nerd then? maybe we should stop trying to label people. | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
On May 10 2007 23:04 dropthesky wrote: maybe we should stop trying to label people. Good answer ;p ~edit: I just noticed one of the Google Ads is now: TheNerds Official Site PC Hardware & Electronics Source Have A Question? Ask a Nerd! www.TheNerds.net =__= | ||
|
hops
United States100 Posts
so did he start to really micro when he got down to like 2 control groups? It seemed to me like he wasnt targeting until then...or am i wrong and he was singling out mutas the whole time? | ||
|
RebelHeart
New Zealand722 Posts
On May 10 2007 22:23 WhatisProtoss wrote: Basic Guide to Microing Land Units: 1. Click away from the attacking unit. 2. Click attack, and hit anywhere. If the attacking unit is far out of range, then your unit will simply move to the place you attack-moved to. so that explains why Reavers suck so much dick* \m/ ( > < ) \m/ *sunken colony variety | ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
lololol
5198 Posts
On May 10 2007 22:23 WhatisProtoss wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 12:47 OMFGlearntoplay wrote: I'm sure this is old info, but what is the best key command to "step and fire" with gols or goons? 1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). -_-;; Basic Guide to Microing Land Units: 1. Click away from the attacking unit. 2. Click attack, and hit anywhere. If the attacking unit is far out of range, then your unit will simply move to the place you attack-moved to. Usually moving away and right-clicking on the attacking unit is not a good plan. If you misclick, your unit will move towards the attacker without doing anything. And your cursor has to move a longer distance. I just like to pull back, then hit attack-move to the same exact spot. I don't have to move my cursor and only have to press the "A" key. The Patrol command makes units react faster than attack, so you should use that instead. | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On May 11 2007 02:05 lololol wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 22:23 WhatisProtoss wrote: On May 10 2007 12:47 OMFGlearntoplay wrote: I'm sure this is old info, but what is the best key command to "step and fire" with gols or goons? 1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). -_-;; Basic Guide to Microing Land Units: 1. Click away from the attacking unit. 2. Click attack, and hit anywhere. If the attacking unit is far out of range, then your unit will simply move to the place you attack-moved to. Usually moving away and right-clicking on the attacking unit is not a good plan. If you misclick, your unit will move towards the attacker without doing anything. And your cursor has to move a longer distance. I just like to pull back, then hit attack-move to the same exact spot. I don't have to move my cursor and only have to press the "A" key. The Patrol command makes units react faster than attack, so you should use that instead. Wrong. That only works for vultures, since their cooldown rate for patrol is half that of it's attack-move. Patrol move won't work well for dragoons or goliaths, which was what this guy asked for. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
On May 11 2007 02:48 WhatisProtoss wrote: Show nested quote + On May 11 2007 02:05 lololol wrote: On May 10 2007 22:23 WhatisProtoss wrote: On May 10 2007 12:47 OMFGlearntoplay wrote: I'm sure this is old info, but what is the best key command to "step and fire" with gols or goons? 1. Right click to the correct spot (don't think so because your men wouldn't stay in formation). 2. Right click beyond where you want to go, then press S. Don't think that's is because there is a pause when you hit S (Stop). 3. Right click beyond, then press P (patrol). Possible. 4. Right click beyond, then press A (attack). Possible, but I understand that P works better for air units (all air units??). -_-;; Basic Guide to Microing Land Units: 1. Click away from the attacking unit. 2. Click attack, and hit anywhere. If the attacking unit is far out of range, then your unit will simply move to the place you attack-moved to. Usually moving away and right-clicking on the attacking unit is not a good plan. If you misclick, your unit will move towards the attacker without doing anything. And your cursor has to move a longer distance. I just like to pull back, then hit attack-move to the same exact spot. I don't have to move my cursor and only have to press the "A" key. The Patrol command makes units react faster than attack, so you should use that instead. Wrong. That only works for vultures, since their cooldown rate for patrol is half that of it's attack-move. Patrol move won't work well for dragoons or goliaths, which was what this guy asked for. is the vult thing actually true...? i don't see them attacking twice as fast on patrol. | ||
|
Bub
United States3518 Posts
| ||
|
Brutalisk
794 Posts
| ||
|
ofclean
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
Capt. Moroni
United States533 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
RaiZ
2813 Posts
On May 11 2007 08:38 Brutalisk wrote: I wonder why Savior upgraded muta armor instead of attack.. is armor really better vs. goliaths? I'd have gone for attack... +1 armor means 1 damage done less (but focus firing with many gols on 1 muta still kills it), but +1 attack means 10-4-2 damage instead of 9-3-1... No. Actually i don't know if it works like it but do you know that mutas +1 defense is clearly way better than mutas +1 attack in Mutas vs Mutas fight ? Because the mutas do 10-3-1 instead of 10-4-2 and the defense get only 8-2-0.5 from 0/0 muta. which mean that they get 9/2/0.5 from +1 attack mutas. You need to know that mutalisk's attack doesn't upgrade the bounce damage. Or do they ? I may not be as good as them but i do know that savior has either understimated boxer or lacked experience against goliaths fights... I mean mutas only against goliats ? It's pure suicide. Would work better if he switched his 12 mutas at least to 12 hydras since they do somewhat more damage to mech units (need confirmation though) and while the mutas get hits by the goliats behind the front line that leave hydras to not take full damage from goliats because they'd be aiming the mutas with their upgraded range missile. I'd not be surprised if goliats without range would work better against the mutal/hydra combo, funny eh ? :o) | ||
|
Brutalisk
794 Posts
@Hydras: Muta/Hyd is a good combination vs. Goliaths but the problem is that Terran can just add a few tanks to his force and then hydras get totally raped. So better get more mutas for the money, and some lings. Mutas is basically the best way vs. a Terran going mechanic. But, well, Boxer had the upgrade advantage (3-3 even!), so maybe Savior should have used dual spire for upgrades (or did he? don't remember). And if Savior could have gotten plague he would have won... | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
On May 06 2007 09:10 SonuvBob wrote: 2007-05-05 Dream Match - FPVODs Game 1 - Boxer POV Not Uploaded Game 2 - Boxer POV Part 1 | Part 2 Game 3 - Boxer POV Part 1 | Part 2 Game 1 - sAviOr POV Part 1 | Part 2 Game 2 - sAviOr POV Part 1 | Part 2 Game 3 - sAviOr POV Part 1 | Part 2 | ||
|
stambe
Bulgaria492 Posts
On May 11 2007 15:34 RaiZ wrote: Show nested quote + On May 11 2007 08:38 Brutalisk wrote: I wonder why Savior upgraded muta armor instead of attack.. is armor really better vs. goliaths? I'd have gone for attack... +1 armor means 1 damage done less (but focus firing with many gols on 1 muta still kills it), but +1 attack means 10-4-2 damage instead of 9-3-1... No. Actually i don't know if it works like it but do you know that mutas +1 defense is clearly way better than mutas +1 attack in Mutas vs Mutas fight ? Because the mutas do 10-3-1 instead of 10-4-2 and the defense get only 8-2-0.5 from 0/0 muta. which mean that they get 9/2/0.5 from +1 attack mutas. You need to know that mutalisk's attack doesn't upgrade the bounce damage. Or do they ? I may not be as good as them but i do know that savior has either understimated boxer or lacked experience against goliaths fights... I mean mutas only against goliats ? It's pure suicide. Would work better if he switched his 12 mutas at least to 12 hydras since they do somewhat more damage to mech units (need confirmation though) and while the mutas get hits by the goliats behind the front line that leave hydras to not take full damage from goliats because they'd be aiming the mutas with their upgraded range missile. I'd not be surprised if goliats without range would work better against the mutal/hydra combo, funny eh ? :o) Actually mutalisk's attack does upgrade the bounce damage, since the first bounce does 1/3 of the muta damage and the second does 1/9, so a 0/0 muta will do 3 damage with the first bounce against unit that has no armor and 3.333 damage with 1 attack upgrade. Also in muta - golie fights, muta armor is clearly better (although it's good to have both upgrades), because 0/0 muta does 8/2/0.5 dmg against 0/0 golie, and 0/0/0 golie does 10 dmg. 3/3 muta does 8/0.5/0.5 dmg against 3/3/3 golie, 3/3/3 golie does 13 dmg(each missile does - (16-3)/2 = 6.5 dmg), so the damage increase of the golies is 30 %. The overall damage of 0/0 muta against 0/0/0 golie is 8 + 2 + 0.5 = 10.5, but the overall dmg of 3/3 muta against 3/3/3 golie is 8 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 9. A 0/0 muta will do 5 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 7 against 3/3/3 golie so the difference between 3/3 and 0/0 muta When the gols get armor muta splash becomes very ineffective - basically only the first hit does real damage, the bounces does minor almost negligible dmg but it still ads up in the long run, or fight for that matter ![]() | ||
|
Musli
Poland5130 Posts
On May 11 2007 03:50 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: sick brings memories, isnt it ? ;-) | ||
|
patrick321
United States185 Posts
The real damage of a fully upgraded goli vs a fully upgraded muta is (32-2*3)/2 = 13 I'd personally get attack upgrades before defense upgrades, but i think muta/ling would be a better choice overall. Lings have a much greater damage potential for their cost. | ||
|
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
On May 10 2007 21:51 boghat wrote: I see your point but who is a nerd then? no one is a nerd. nerd is a label, with negative conotations, created to classify people. If you think it doesn't have negative conotations then you're kidding yourself. Essentially, some faggot in High School (probably some football playing jock type) thought "hey.. these fags are smarter than me... there MUST be some way I can kill their self esteem while I'm in a position [popular enough] to do so". Unfortunately [or fortunately if you're a nerd] the nerds grow up, get a social life (which they had the capacity to do anyways, it's just that they were busy studying and thinking of the future so they'll have a career/money) and the stupid fuck who used to call them nerd ends up working at walmart nursing a crack habit. Nerd was made to put people down! Don't be put down. Work hard, believe and achieve. You can ALWAYS work on getting a social life. Fuck, it is so easy to meet people, become friends and go clubbing every week, i.e. "socialise". However, it's F*CKING hard to finish a good degree in a good university and get a good job. Trust me. Take it from someone who tried to shake the "nerd" tag and found that the people that call you nerd are so f*cking pathetic, insecure and feel so threatened that they'll do anything to get you off your game plan. </ rant> Hell.. I'm at work... I have a government job, I'm paid lots of money and I have very little work to do. I MUST be a nerd. Such a hard life it is sitting on my arse all day, working out at the gym and going out on the weekends while the rest of my "cool" friends are labouring at construction sites on weekends to make ends meet. I am SUCH THE NERD. And now.. maybe now you understand why I hate the word nerd. Because to me, nerd doesn't mean "social ineptitude" or "lone loser". It means "guy who is temporarily sacrificing his social status to get ahead in life". And most people don't interpret it that way and misuse the term to hurt people. </ rant within rant> | ||
|
Detonate
Iceland578 Posts
(i just made up that figure..but yea) | ||
|
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
![]() | ||
|
I_are_n00b
196 Posts
A nerd doesn't mean someone that does computers are whatever. It probably originally meant that this person devotes a lot of time in academics that usually involve math based things. However, computers and computer games came out of this culture and that's why they're nerds. There are also a lot of stuff that these nerds generally do or look like. So that's why "nerd" comes with a certain stigma too. Just because these guys today might not LOOK like nerds, doesn't make them any less a nerd. They're not jocks, they're not goths, they're not emos, they're nerds. Period. | ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
On May 13 2007 19:35 I_are_n00b wrote: Is everyone offended by the term nerd or something? It's just like the term jock for athletes. Oh, you can give a billion examples of how this athlete did so and so, but it doesn't matter. He's classified as a jock. He might also be classified as something else, but it doesn't make him any less of a jock. It is a slang term we use to classify people. Saying that these guys are socially inept is probably wrong.... now. But to say that these guys weren't nerds to begin with is silly. I'm sure Reach, Yellow and even Boxer were huge nerds before starcraft got off the ground. I'm not saying they were socially inept, but I'm saying they were nerds. That's why we come up with slang (and a big reason for ebonics) isn't it? We express ideas that aren't exactly in the dictionaries, and through one word that can convey a complex definition. A nerd doesn't mean someone that does computers are whatever. It probably originally meant that this person devotes a lot of time in academics that usually involve math based things. However, computers and computer games came out of this culture and that's why they're nerds. There are also a lot of stuff that these nerds generally do or look like. So that's why "nerd" comes with a certain stigma too. Just because these guys today might not LOOK like nerds, doesn't make them any less a nerd. They're not jocks, they're not goths, they're not emos, they're nerds. Period. Classifying people into distinct groups has never led anywhere good. | ||
|
Cloud
Sexico5880 Posts
On May 10 2007 22:27 WhatisProtoss wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2007 19:59 boghat wrote: On May 10 2007 19:19 MaZza[KIS] wrote: On May 10 2007 13:22 Storchen wrote: On May 10 2007 13:21 SCNewb wrote: On May 10 2007 13:15 il0seonpurpose wrote: thanks, dude that was good goliath micro, too bad he lost what do u mean he lost? -_- the game maybe? Pimp move by boxer. Posing with girls, must have been exciting for them nerds ![]() You know what... I"m siuck of comments like this. They're not nerds just because they play a computer game. The level of skill, knoweldge and brainpower required to play starcraft makes them extrodinary. A nerd (in sc terms) is someone like Idra (no offence.. nothing against Idra). He works his but off COPYING other peoples builds and things and when he wins he BM's. That's nerd. Nerd is when you're using a game to "escape from reality and social inadequacy". There's nothing nerdy about these guys coz they're probably PIMPS in rea life. From what I hear from Rekrul's stories most of them are. Please look up definition of nerd before you say stupid stuff like that. </ rant> sorry for the rant everyone... maybe it was unwarranted. Ownage battle scene pic and even more ownage micro ... This weird, pathetic attempt to define what a nerd is makes you a huge mega nerd. OWNED.^.GG.^. But seriously dude if you actually want an argument: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) nerd –noun Slang. 1. a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person. 2. an intelligent but single-minded person obsessed with a nonsocial hobby or pursuit: a computer nerd. American Heritage Dictionary - nerd also nurd (nûrd) n. Slang 1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person. 2. A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept. Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by the second definition. However, the second definition doesn't imply any negativity (except for the socially inept part which is debatable -Midas lol-) like the first one does so just because someone is labeled a nerd doesn't mean it has to have a bad connotation to it. The fact that I took the time to make this post probably makes me a nerd also somehow but I'm okay with it ~_~ Wow.... Starcraft pros are definitely nerds by both definitions that you provided. They practice anywhere from 10-14 hours a day on a computer. They definitely don't have the social skills of a normal person who lives a normal life. And they have the single-minded intent of playing Starcraft. Starcraft is a non-social game. Yes, progamers are nerds. What's wrong with calling them nerds? They can't get girls; they wouldn't be able to maintain a relationship without ruining their gaming career; they have little time to spend on how to have healthy social relationships. They're just the fucking same as any other person dude, an athlete wont be able to mantain a relationship without "ruining" their career. A guy working behind a desk is stuck sitting there for 8 or so hours, just like any other sc player that plays for a living. And its not rare for someone like that to keep working past those hours if theyre ambitious. We know from rekrul that there are some pros that go clubbing, some that stay in, but thats because their own personality, not because of the fucking game. They dont have the social skills of a normal person? At the very least they fucking live among their teamplayers for crist sake, if they were socially inept as you portray them then they would fucking become fed up with each other and that would be obviously noticeable. There are 2 kinds of people in this world, some can go into a bar and talk to a total stranger and some cant, but either way its because of their own personality, not because of something you can just generalize. So shut the fuck up please and stop fucking up the thread. | ||
|
I_are_n00b
196 Posts
I mean where does it stop in terms of classifying people? When I say basketball player, what do you think of? What about when I say politician? There is no adjectives that are already associated with these occupations like tall, old, skinny, suit, etc...? You are already classifying people into groups in your freaking head, why the hell does it even matter? Are all basketball players tall? No, there are exceptions (Bogues, Boykins, etc...) and the same with politicians. | ||
|
GongKyuckTerran
Croatia1096 Posts
nice vid,sick pictures ![]() | ||
|
Freezard
Sweden1012 Posts
On May 13 2007 18:47 MaZza[KIS] wrote: no one is a nerd. nerd is a label, with negative conotations, created to classify people. If you think it doesn't have negative conotations then you're kidding yourself. Essentially, some faggot in High School (probably some football playing jock type) thought "hey.. these fags are smarter than me... there MUST be some way I can kill their self esteem while I'm in a position [popular enough] to do so". Unfortunately [or fortunately if you're a nerd] the nerds grow up, get a social life (which they had the capacity to do anyways, it's just that they were busy studying and thinking of the future so they'll have a career/money) and the stupid fuck who used to call them nerd ends up working at walmart nursing a crack habit. Nerd was made to put people down! Don't be put down. Work hard, believe and achieve. You can ALWAYS work on getting a social life. Fuck, it is so easy to meet people, become friends and go clubbing every week, i.e. "socialise". However, it's F*CKING hard to finish a good degree in a good university and get a good job. Trust me. Take it from someone who tried to shake the "nerd" tag and found that the people that call you nerd are so f*cking pathetic, insecure and feel so threatened that they'll do anything to get you off your game plan. </ rant> Hell.. I'm at work... I have a government job, I'm paid lots of money and I have very little work to do. I MUST be a nerd. Such a hard life it is sitting on my arse all day, working out at the gym and going out on the weekends while the rest of my "cool" friends are labouring at construction sites on weekends to make ends meet. I am SUCH THE NERD. And now.. maybe now you understand why I hate the word nerd. Because to me, nerd doesn't mean "social ineptitude" or "lone loser". It means "guy who is temporarily sacrificing his social status to get ahead in life". And most people don't interpret it that way and misuse the term to hurt people. </ rant within rant> This is the best post I've ever read on TL.net. | ||
|
[V]
United States905 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50584 Posts
On April 26 2012 21:23 [V] wrote: Reminiscing on the old. What a battle we had BW. Hope the mods understand my digging up the pits of BW, not enough content in BW section lately. ![]() MDT THREADS ROCK | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
![]() | ||
|
FraCuS
United States1072 Posts
good times.... | ||
|
Abort Retry Fail
2636 Posts
| ||
|
Bswhunter
Australia954 Posts
Want to find others like it. | ||
|
KenNage
Chile885 Posts
| ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
| ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On April 26 2012 22:22 MasterReY wrote: so does someone still have the video or a working link? :O ![]() | ||
|
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
On April 26 2012 22:29 Cascade wrote: Show nested quote + On April 26 2012 22:22 MasterReY wrote: so does someone still have the video or a working link? :O http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weKL1asT4XU ![]() I saw this VOD years ago :o. Why didn't BoxeR go valiath instead of pure goliath? | ||
|
lightsentry
413 Posts
On April 27 2012 01:04 Demonhunter04 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 26 2012 22:29 Cascade wrote: On April 26 2012 22:22 MasterReY wrote: so does someone still have the video or a working link? :O http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weKL1asT4XU ![]() I saw this VOD years ago :o. Why didn't BoxeR go valiath instead of pure goliath? Savior had quite a few scourge out, possibly all the valks were taken out beforehand, I'm not sure I haven't seen the full game >>. | ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
| ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
| ||
|
SkimGuy
Canada709 Posts
On April 27 2012 03:05 mizU wrote: wtf is nada wearing O.O That's Midas xd | ||
|
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5251 Posts
| ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
| ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10233 Posts
| ||
| ||
Kung Fu Cup
2025 Monthly #3: Day 1
Classic vs SolarLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
OSC
Mid Season Playoffs
Percival vs ChamLIVE!
Spirit vs Harstem
Cure vs TBD
Krystianer vs TBD
WardiTV337
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2Rain Hyuk Horang2 Bisu Backho Flash Soma Stork Last [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Adnapsc2 StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s Dota 2 |
|
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
PiGosaur Monday
RSL Revival
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
[ Show More ] Kung Fu Cup
IPSL
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
BSL 21
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
BSL 21
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
WardiTV Korean Royale
The PondCast
|
|
|