OSL/MSL Discussion - Page 2
Forum Index > BW General |
himurakenshin
Canada1845 Posts
| ||
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
On January 28 2007 19:01 himurakenshin wrote: justin = bifrost? yeah he had many name changes iirc | ||
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
On January 28 2007 18:57 Cbreaker wrote: Much isn't original, he copied Rainbow's build vs Child on 815. Also, Midas did screw up, only in that he did not save his main when he had the chance. The loss of tanks was completely trivial as a deciding factor in the game, because without a base and scvs Midas could not have threatened the island expo(s). Losing the 7 tanks was actually helpful toward Midas' chance at a comeback because 7 tanks = 14 supply and Midas did not have any depots, thus he cannot build dropship or scvs and lost in that respect. One might argue that the tanks would have been useful in killing saviors hive (by bombarding the lurkers, but where would he go from there afterward? There is still the island.... He would obliterate the main, then irrad. his vessels to kill drones. Once the main goes down, I don't think savior has any way of killing vessels, though while his main was going down, he probably would have plunked down a spore as soon as he could. | ||
![]()
Manifesto7
Osaka27151 Posts
As for Light, his micro was terrible in the RT game, and while he stayed in there with his vults, he really lost the game in the first five minutes, losing those scv and tanks for nothing. The three rax was alright, but he should have known better not to go up the ramp. That is the mistake he makes, and the mistake Sea doesnt. | ||
sOnagi[3.33]
Korea (South)886 Posts
On January 28 2007 20:17 Manifesto7 wrote: I dont think you give enough credit to either player in the ggplay vs fbh match, live2win. I thought it was a great example of a zerg playing definsively to control the outcome of late game. Also, I thought the macro from FBH was great, if only he had been able to use it a bit better. As for Light, his micro was terrible in the RT game, and while he stayed in there with his vults, he really lost the game in the first five minutes, losing those scv and tanks for nothing. The three rax was alright, but he should have known better not to go up the ramp. That is the mistake he makes, and the mistake Sea doesnt. could someone post up the Sea[Shield] vs. Nal_rA game on Rush Hour III? i would like to see how different it was from LighT[aLive] vs. Bisu.. thanks again! | ||
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
On January 28 2007 20:28 sOnagi wrote: could someone post up the Sea[Shield] vs. Nal_rA game on Rush Hour III? i would like to see how different it was from LighT[aLive] vs. Bisu.. thanks again! I don't have the game, but I watched it here http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3345683709806432512&q=sea nal_ra | ||
![]()
Live2Win
![]()
United States6657 Posts
On January 28 2007 20:17 Manifesto7 wrote: I dont think you give enough credit to either player in the ggplay vs fbh match, live2win. I thought it was a great example of a zerg playing definsively to control the outcome of late game. Also, I thought the macro from FBH was great, if only he had been able to use it a bit better. As for Light, his micro was terrible in the RT game, and while he stayed in there with his vults, he really lost the game in the first five minutes, losing those scv and tanks for nothing. The three rax was alright, but he should have known better not to go up the ramp. That is the mistake he makes, and the mistake Sea doesnt. You're probably right. My views are highly biased for zerg usually. Especially ZvT. | ||
| ||