Replay P2P software - Page 4

Suicide

United States475 Posts

July 13 2006 13:31 GMT

#61

Can we force FrozenArbiter to run this all day? I remember him saying he had like some rediculous amount of space used up by replays (2 gigs or something I think)

2dd

Belgium421 Posts

July 14 2006 17:39 GMT

#62

nice

Musli

Poland5130 Posts

July 14 2006 17:48 GMT

#63

2Gigs ?
its pretty small ;]
people in poland have replays on DVD's ;-P
i know lots of such collectors :-]

2dd

Belgium421 Posts

July 14 2006 21:30 GMT

#64

yea right

MIStrZZZ

Poland62 Posts

July 14 2006 21:39 GMT

#65

this would be awesome;o

Last.Midnight

Australia906 Posts

July 14 2006 21:55 GMT

#66

On July 15 2006 02:48 Musli wrote:
2Gigs ?
its pretty small ;]
people in poland have replays on DVD's ;-P
i know lots of such collectors :-]

Cool dudes obviously.

superjoppe

Sweden3694 Posts

July 14 2006 22:02 GMT

#67

On July 15 2006 06:55 Last.Midnight wrote:
Cool dudes obviously.

You are the coolest dude.

2dd

Belgium421 Posts

July 15 2006 00:07 GMT

#68

On July 15 2006 06:55 Last.Midnight wrote:

Show nested quote +

Cool dudes obviously.

haha

listal

United States228 Posts

July 20 2006 09:37 GMT

#69

On July 11 2006 12:17 superjoppe wrote:
make a program and i'll use it

edit: and a port to linux and mac osx

i don't think they should bother with linux. there is a bug with WINE regarding the battle.net menus. rather than writing the screens over as you select new menus (channel, game list, create game, etc.), it just writes over them, making a garbled mess of the screen. it hasn't been solved for over a year and a half, but the issue # is still open and being posted on each update WINE comes out with. it doesn't look good though

.

is it going to be p2p or server/client? who the heck would buy and maintain a server for replays without requiring payment?

Seraphim

United States4467 Posts

November 25 2006 07:50 GMT

#70

Hm, sorry to bring this back up, but this seems like a REALLY good idea. Is it in development at all, or is a trashed idea?

Thanks

Taiche

France1963 Posts

November 25 2006 08:25 GMT

#71

I think this was trashed ; no one has posted on this recently, even on the BWP's topic.
I personally don't have enough time to do everything I'd like to do in my life, so I haven't spent any second on this project, sorry...

Seraphim

United States4467 Posts

November 25 2006 08:35 GMT

#72

that's no problem

...I was curious whether this project was underway or not

sundance

Slovakia3201 Posts

November 25 2006 17:36 GMT

#73

Sorry i'm very busy this semester with both school and work but this should change soon.

kyari_

Romania558 Posts

November 25 2006 18:21 GMT

#74

i think tec27 was on the right track when he mentioned direct connect, if you guys haven't already heard about it (http://www.dcpp.net/). no, it's not able to do things like search for replays by build order or by map, but it would still be a million times better than nothing. for those of you who haven't heard of it, think of it as limewire and IRC combined, to put it simply, although there's a lot more to the program than that.

about fake reps: the best way to maintain replay authenticity would be for people to have a naming pattern for replays (that involved progamer names), and to have replays sorted in folders by league/year. when you download a rep, use BWChart to check APM levels/hotkeys/basically confirming what you expected to see. you can always report people that are sharing deliberately fake reps to the operators, and they can decide what to do from there, such as warning or banning.

i already have a DC++ hub that i can run, if need be, but i figure someone a little closer to the TL.net staff would be a more suitable choice to run such a place. if you think it's a good idea, ask me for any details.

Prev 1 2 3 4 All

Please or register to reply.

Replay P2P software - Page 4

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming