• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:49
CEST 04:49
KST 11:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week4[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings We need to be discussing a new patch right now! Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Script to open stream directly using middle click
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 608 users

iCCup rating system discussion - Page 2

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Holy Check
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Romania155 Posts
October 30 2011 15:38 GMT
#21
Iccup has a lot of limitations function-wise. For example, clan league only works if there are exactly 10 teams, not more, not less. I wouldn't be surprised if the ranking system is also subjected to such inflexibility.

Also, I don't think any of the higher-ups would care enough to change the ranking system. After all, the BW server only has 600 - 700 players on a good day. And even in the best case scenario, a new ranking system won't change that by a noticeable amount.
Black[CAT]
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Malaysia2589 Posts
October 30 2011 16:05 GMT
#22
I honestly believe that changing the system might reattract koreans back to iccup to check out the system even if its juz for a while..
Iccup must implement this for evryones benefit.
You mean ESPORTS isnt a synonym for SC2? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -Proud owner of a Filco Majestouch 2 with Cherry Blue Switches- BW or SC2? Why not both?
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-30 16:14:02
October 30 2011 16:13 GMT
#23
I agree. There was a ladder that didn't have a bnet server (it just tracked stats on a website so you could play on any server) which didn't catch on, but which used an ELO system. It was really cool and I wish it had gotten popular ;P I dunno if iCCup is willing to make a major change like this, but now's as good a time as any since they're not exactly booming (if it's broke, fix it...).
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
jhNz
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Germany2762 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-30 17:27:05
October 30 2011 17:25 GMT
#24
I think you guys are right about that, the system really needs some refurbishment. But the cool thing about it is, that you get to play some really good players in the beginning of each season. Back in the days when I used to play more, it was always kinda cool to play some famous koreans / foreigners right after the ladder reset. Even if I always got my ass handed to me :D

But I totally see your point. Iccup should offer the the opportunity to start at a higher rank after you finished pretty good in a previous season. Maybe a 2 rank penalty or something like that? Or some kind of "placement time" like you get your old rank from last season again, or maybe with a small penalty. And if you win a certain amount of your first few matches you'll keep it, otherwise you'll be demoted. You'd have to play players of the same rank of course.

Don't know how it should look like in detail but I completely agree with you.
http://twitter.com/jhNz
gutshot
Profile Joined February 2011
United States429 Posts
October 30 2011 17:40 GMT
#25
this actually is a brilliant idea and i think it will definitely attract koreans. they do not want to play/waste time playing 50 games until they can reach #1

but I doubt any of the higher ups would even read this or they actually care about iCCup bw.
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
October 30 2011 17:58 GMT
#26
Korean players want to play on the servers where the pros or retired pros are playing. Boxer, Nada, Bisu, Hyuk, Jaedong, Sea all played on iCCup at one time, just to name a few. They have a korean-friendly server now with progamers on it. Why on earth would any of you think changing the ladder system would 'attract koreans'?
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
Phrujbaz
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
Netherlands512 Posts
October 30 2011 19:37 GMT
#27
Comparison of rating systems in order of accuracy

0. Rating systems not based in statistics:

Current ICCup system is an example.

Pros:

* Can use the rating system to motivate people, eg to play many games or to prefer certain maps.

Cons:

* Rating correlates very weakly with playing strength.

1. First generation rating systems:

ELO.

Pros:

* Simple and easy to understand.
* Widely used and widely known.
* Easy to implement algorithm

Disadvantages:

* Cannot distinguish between uncertain rank and solidly established rank (does not measure uncertainty).
* Tendency for players to want to play against stronger players.
* Disincentivizes playing against new players.
* Takes a long time to settle on your rank.
* If you suddenly improve in skill the system or don't play for a while, the system won't pick your new rating up quickly.
* Not very accurate: you can swing pretty far around your 'true' rank.

2. Second generation

TrueSkill, Glicko

Pros:

* System measures uncertainty in the rating, so a lot of the artifacts in the first generation rating systems disappear.
* Still relatively easy to implement.
* Still relatively easy to understand.
* Reasonably accurate

Cons:

* Takes relatively long to converge on your true rank.
* Not very responsive to rapid changes in playing strength.

3. Third generation

Decayed history algorithms.

The go server KGS has used a decayed history algorithm with excellent results for some time.
http://www.gokgs.com/help/rmath.html

The basic idea is that recent results are weighed more strongly in the rating calculation than older results.

Pros:

* Quick to converge
* Accurate
* Responsive to changes in playing strength

Cons:

* Not widely known / not many standard implementations available
* Tendency for frequent players to get 'stuck': if the rating system thinks it has measured your rank very accurately, you can get stuck and not gain any points even though you're improving. You can only get unstuck by not playing for a while.

4. Fourth generation

Whole history rating.
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/WHR/

Unlike other systems does not perform incremental calculations but directly computes over the entire history of a player.

Pros:

* Quick to converge
* Very accurate
* Responsive to changes in playing strength
* Players don't get stuck if they play frequently

Cons:

* Not widely known / not many standard implementations available
* Slightly more computationally expensive than other systems
* Has parameters that need to be trained for the system to work optimally.
Caution! Future approaching rapidly at a rate of about 60 seconds per minute.
[sc1f]eonzerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Belgium6556 Posts
October 30 2011 19:41 GMT
#28
On October 31 2011 02:58 ninazerg wrote:
Korean players want to play on the servers where the pros or retired pros are playing. Boxer, Nada, Bisu, Hyuk, Jaedong, Sea all played on iCCup at one time, just to name a few. They have a korean-friendly server now with progamers on it. Why on earth would any of you think changing the ladder system would 'attract koreans'?


agree, the only way to kor back is fish and brain down
medic_ro
Profile Joined July 2011
Romania105 Posts
October 30 2011 20:10 GMT
#29
--- Nuked ---
zimp
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Hungary951 Posts
October 30 2011 20:32 GMT
#30
i disagree. i think iccup has the best rating system, the only problem is there are too few players...

with iccup system, the majority, the lower level players have some kind of satisfaction of reaching something, which encourages them to play more.
elo system is only good if opponents are being set vs each other, not when you pick whoever you want to play against.
at fish server there is the elo system and i can tell you i dont really like it. it distinguishes players like this:
bad | rest | good | very good | very very good
where the starting level compared to iccup is like high C.
since you get the same amount of points for a win and for a loss, and most players only want to play vs someone who has the same points as they have, like 80% of the players are stuck at ~1000 points and there are players with like 100 win and 100 loss having the same amount of points as someone who just started there. and it feels crap to play a lot of games, win half of them, and see that u didnt make a step ahead. that makes me wanna stop playing.
or do you think its normal that Sziky has only 1282 points on fish with 75 win and 59 loss?

actually it might be better for good players to have a system where they get to their level with less noob bashing, but youve got to create a system that ensures everyone good playing conditions. and i think iccup is good in that. i mean come on, if it was so bad to play 50 games to get on your level, progamers wouldnt have played on iccup. but they did

the only problem now is that there are too few players. changing the system won't really help that...
its all bad since ladder a-b channel became empty;;


agentzimp
TL+ Member
playa
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States1284 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-30 20:50:19
October 30 2011 20:47 GMT
#31
For competitive players, ELO is probably, by far, the better system. My biggest gripe is MOTW. I don't think there should be MOTW for B- or above players. I always have to quit at B- because I'm never active enough or have any incentive to learn all of the new maps. Due to losing more and more points per loss as you rank up, naturally, only MOTW are played by most players; there's not many players to begin with.

High ranks should mean something, and MOTW simply inflates ranks. And since Korean pro gamers aren't even playing on iccup at the moment, it's just annoying and an inconvenience that makes me more inclined to play Korean ladders if I want to play at a high level.
Nakata
Profile Joined December 2010
Bulgaria67 Posts
October 30 2011 21:43 GMT
#32
Until multiaccounting and clearstats are options on ICCUP problems can't be solved. But I still like ICCUP.
Terran is IMBA!!!
fabiano
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Brazil4644 Posts
October 30 2011 21:54 GMT
#33
On October 31 2011 04:37 Phrujbaz wrote:
(...)
3. Third generation

Decayed history algorithms.

The go server KGS has used a decayed history algorithm with excellent results for some time.
http://www.gokgs.com/help/rmath.html

The basic idea is that recent results are weighed more strongly in the rating calculation than older results.

Pros:

* Quick to converge
* Accurate
* Responsive to changes in playing strength

Cons:

* Not widely known / not many standard implementations available
* Tendency for frequent players to get 'stuck': if the rating system thinks it has measured your rank very accurately, you can get stuck and not gain any points even though you're improving. You can only get unstuck by not playing for a while.


Nice summary.

But please do not go with that KGS ranking system, it is horrible. I got stuck at 3D with multiple accounts and it sucks. There is a dude there, TheCaptain if I'm not mistaken, poor guy will be forever 4D....

Maybe at higher levels the current ranking system is inconvenient, but for me, a D player, the ranking is just fine.
"When the geyser died, a probe came out" - SirJolt
BobTheBuilder1377
Profile Joined August 2011
Somalia335 Posts
October 30 2011 22:49 GMT
#34
ELOcup anyone? :D
sataNik[pG]
Profile Joined July 2003
Greece722 Posts
November 02 2011 11:50 GMT
#35
The current system is over abused making people able to go up the ranks by opponent selection and by the fact that they can
gain points even at a 30% win ratio. How accurate is that? To gain points when you should actually be losing.
The rating system is supposed to try to be indicative of a players strength but here it seems to me that it just gives ways to
people to look better than they are. I don't understand what is the problem of having a low rating if that means that you will
play vs players who are a little better or a little worse than you. It will help you become better sooner.
The game is fun only when the outcome is unclear, not when the whole game is just another routine.
Sawamura
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Malaysia7602 Posts
November 02 2011 11:54 GMT
#36
I really hate knowing that I am a D- level and yet I am fighting players who are D+ to C- smurf , checks hotkeys of opponent who smash me , 1-0 300 apm through out the whole game . T_T
BW/KT Forever R.I.P KT.Violet dearly missed ..
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
22:50
Best Games of SC
Clem vs ByuN
SHIN vs GuMiho
PiGStarcraft617
LiquipediaDiscussion
SC Evo Complete
22:00
Enki Epic Ser. Taeja vs soO EN
davetesta48
Liquipedia
OSC
20:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Spirit vs GeraldLIVE!
Solar vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft617
Nina 198
RuFF_SC2 134
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4929
Larva 245
Aegong 77
NaDa 58
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever810
NeuroSwarm129
League of Legends
JimRising 827
febbydoto12
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K266
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor145
Other Games
summit1g9399
shahzam817
ViBE212
C9.Mang0120
Trikslyr70
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38549
BasetradeTV39
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH204
• Hupsaiya 68
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1776
Other Games
• Scarra1146
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
7h 11m
SHIN vs Clem
Cure vs TBD
FEL
9h 11m
FEL
13h 11m
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
13h 11m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
15h 11m
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
DaveTesta Events
15h 11m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Classic vs TBD
FEL
1d 12h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.