Ive tried to catch good players maphackers sometimes, now i've read totally how to use penguinplug and i understood it completely,
Penguin already proved that Lois hacked in that game, but i wasnt very convinced, so i downloaded 7 more replays of him just to make sure, And in all games there are some suspicious actions, but 1 game surprised me so much...
Many many suspicious actions, and all of them i found them at bwchart, and checked and he had no vision..
Here is the replay, taken from wgtour vs Mgz)Nookie which by the way have (H) flag but he didnt made any really suspicious moves..
I dont know the process for wgtour to detect a maphacker, but i do think that he deserves to be checked out.... if any of you know how to report him go ahead..
Seriously, any maphacker should be detected right away.
You know, if this is true its so fucking pathetic how hard people try to make people think they're gods at broodwar. I can only imagine how many of the "top" gamers use maphack. Don't they feel pathetic when they have to lie about cheating in a videogame? Virgins.
yea for some people this is gonna be really unfair 'cause SW)Lois got 3rd place and made to the finals... another player should have be there instead.... anyway i dont think wgtour will do anything to fix that..
nice post loloko2, but if you are going to post a proof to accuse someone, make it like a scientist : post the time, the action type and the target of the action, then add at least 2 screenshot of the exact location where the action happen, and copy bwchart text or an aditional bwchart screenshot.
If you say "there is many suspicious actions", you just sound like a politician that only say "there is many flaws" in this opponents ideas
You dont need "many suspicious actions", you need just 1 proof
I haven't read all your posts, I'm too lazy for..but..
I think they players from knowed(?) teams, have the preassure of have a nice game playing, whether using hack or not. I believe, if you're going to play for a good Team, you have to play honest, no hack, no sh!t, no things that make BW bad.
You dont need "many suspicious actions", you need just 1 proof
Look this comment from testie: ToT)Testie(rS ? BWScanner is not safe. I RANDOM zerg? He does this kind of build? Just watch the replay. There is a 1/3 chance i'm zerg. There is a 1/3 chance i'm on the island he lifts to. He scouted nothing and built an academy and firebats before even knowing my race. If you understand brood war, you'd understand this is not a viable strategy in any option, even for risky shit. This is beyond risk.
On May 09 2005 11:02 Attacke wrote: Look this comment from testie: ToT)Testie(rS ? BWScanner is not safe. I RANDOM zerg? He does this kind of build? Just watch the replay. There is a 1/3 chance i'm zerg. There is a 1/3 chance i'm on the island he lifts to. He scouted nothing and built an academy and firebats before even knowing my race. If you understand brood war, you'd understand this is not a viable strategy in any option, even for risky shit. This is beyond risk.
On May 09 2005 10:36 superpenguin wrote: nice post loloko2, but if you are going to post a proof to accuse someone, make it like a scientist : post the time, the action type and the target of the action, then add at least 2 screenshot of the exact location where the action happen, and copy bwchart text or an aditional bwchart screenshot.
If you say "there is many suspicious actions", you just sound like a politician that only say "there is many flaws" in this opponents ideas
You dont need "many suspicious actions", you need just 1 proof
kekekeke im too lazy...
anyway im sure theres 2-3 100% proof in that replay,
On May 09 2005 11:02 Attacke wrote: Look this comment from testie: ToT)Testie(rS ? BWScanner is not safe. I RANDOM zerg? He does this kind of build? Just watch the replay. There is a 1/3 chance i'm zerg. There is a 1/3 chance i'm on the island he lifts to. He scouted nothing and built an academy and firebats before even knowing my race. If you understand brood war, you'd understand this is not a viable strategy in any option, even for risky shit. This is beyond risk.
Testie really has a nack for finding maphackers. You can make as many "he should know kekeke" comments as you want, but he called it with Madcow and now with Lois, just on TLT ladder, and Testie doesn't throw around "he hacks" like other whinier top players (androide).
I just find it weird is all, seeing as his commenting about hacking is the only time he chooses to be conservative with his flaming.
imagine the influence it would of had on the entire tournament if he was banned before hand, a TOTALLY different draw and most likely the results would different, not nescerarily in top2 or top3 but in the top 8 for SURE :D
EPT
