| Forum Index > BW General |
Stop being jerks to each other please. Stop talking about seperate TL sites, BW vs SC2, or which fan base is retarded/ignorant/elitist/old/constipated. Don't post in the thread unless you take the time to read the situation. Don't post in the thread to let others know that they should have been banned longer. Don't post in the thread to claim that kespa is the evil empire based on you reading the translated musing of a random Chinese blogger. Honestly people, this is common sense. I hate the fact that I have to moderate to the lowest common denominator. Make my job easier please. | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On September 28 2011 04:35 Chill wrote: So the players' association also manages the players? That's strange to say the least. I think Kespa is more like the NBA than they are the players' association. Don't think BW in Korea even has a players' union tbh. Especially since so many of the pro gamers are underage. | ||
|
No_Roo
United States905 Posts
._. | ||
|
duncan.mc
United States231 Posts
On September 28 2011 05:32 Zzoram wrote: So basically, all sponsors will now sponsor KeSPA, and KeSPA will distribute funds out to all the teams? This ensures that if 1 sponsor backs out, a whole team doesn't have to disband as a result. It might also level of financial playing field between teams, by closing the gap in funds each team has available. Maybe it'll also mean that trading players between teams will be easier as well. If that were the case, would teams lose the sponsor name in their team title? Is it no longer Samsung Khan, but just Khan? | ||
|
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
good news, FINALLY :D On September 28 2011 05:45 duncan.mc wrote: If that were the case, would teams lose the sponsor name in their team title? Is it no longer Samsung Khan, but just Khan? Not a chance, then Samsung would have to stop sponsoring the team | ||
|
villageidiot
353 Posts
| ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
 Stop trying to find the dark side of everything, seriously why is this thread so negative. A month ago people were concerned we wouldn't be able to find a single sponsor, now we've got six companies showing interest. If you're weak in the worst of times you could at least show some strength when things are good...Here's to another season of proleague. | ||
|
villageidiot
353 Posts
On September 28 2011 05:54 Chef wrote: Grey skies are clearing up Stop trying to find the dark side of everything, seriously why is this thread so negative. A month ago people were concerned we wouldn't be able to find a single sponsor, now we've got four showing interest. If you're weak in the worst of times you could at least show some strength when things are good...Here's to another season of proleague. It is becoming tradition to be pissed off in preseason. | ||
|
gustavohmp
Brazil139 Posts
Lets say KTR wants to increase Flash salary. Obviously they cant do it without asking the sponsors. Now, instead of asking the sponsors themselves, they go to Kespa, and Kespa goes to the sponsors. Unless Kespa has a saying in how much they are going to increase Flash salary (in my example, obviously), I think Kespa management is a good thing. KeSPA does drop the ball sometimes, and thats why we are afraid of it. But I think its for the best. And it is fucking dope that they can assure that there will be 8 teams and the 2 teams WILL be formed. KeSPA power is no joke. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
|
gustavohmp
Brazil139 Posts
On September 28 2011 05:59 tree.hugger wrote: So they're going to split up the existing teams and redistribute the players? So if you were a fan of one particular team, now the players you were a fan of are going to be split amongst several teams? Am I seriously reading that right, how does that make any sense? The players of OZ and WMF will be split. The other teams are still the same. | ||
|
duncan.mc
United States231 Posts
On September 28 2011 05:49 Iplaythings wrote: I am curious what the names of these teams will be! good news, FINALLY :D Not a chance, then Samsung would have to stop sponsoring the team But my question is based on IF Zzoram's interpretation is correct, where companies don't sponsor teams directly. What if all 5-6 companies that KeSPA is talking to decide to sponsor but only 3 teams are added to make 8? Either someone's not getting their name up there or there's going to be some Microsoft/Coca-Cola Oz team name action going on. Look at professional physical sports. Organizations like the NBA have official sponsors, but teams aren't named Gatorade Lakers or McDonald's Mavericks. I imagine the sponsor names would stay too, I'm mainly just trying to figure out what this "KeSPA middle man" thing really means. | ||
|
deafhobbit
United States828 Posts
On September 28 2011 06:02 duncan.mc wrote: But my question is based on IF Zzoram's interpretation is correct, where companies don't sponsor teams directly. What if all 5-6 companies that KeSPA is talking to decide to sponsor but only 3 teams are added to make 8? Either someone's not getting their name up there or there's going to be some Microsoft/Coca-Cola Oz team name action going on. Look at professional physical sports. Organizations like the NBA have official sponsors, but teams aren't named Gatorade Lakers or McDonald's Mavericks. I imagine the sponsor names would stay too, I'm mainly just trying to figure out what this "KeSPA middle man" thing really means. FYI, it's pretty common in other parts of the world for professional sports teams to have their corporate sponsors in their names, especially in Asia. Also, we have 7 teams currently (SKT, KT, CJ, Stars, Khan, STX, and Ace) so even if they only add 1 team there will be 8. | ||
|
xxpack09
United States2160 Posts
Hellll yeah, if we can get 9 teams that would be spectacular | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
Anyways, I hope that we'll get atleast 1 more team to get up to 9 teams in total. Honestly I don't mind if Kespa reorganize all the players and make them switch teams to keep everything balanced. | ||
|
duncan.mc
United States231 Posts
On September 28 2011 06:08 deafhobbit wrote: FYI, it's pretty common in other parts of the world for professional sports teams to have their corporate sponsors in their names, especially in Asia. Cool, didn't know that. My experience is limited to American sports, Premier League soccer, and Olympics. EDIT: Well, I guess NASCAR has it too. | ||
|
SgtPepper
United States568 Posts
| ||
|
deafhobbit
United States828 Posts
On September 28 2011 06:10 Xiphos wrote: So SKKespaT1, KT Kespa Rolster, CJ Kespa Entus? Samsung Kespa Khan? Anyways, I hope that we'll get atleast 1 more team to get up to 9 teams in total. Honestly I don't mind if Kespa reorganize all the players and make them switch teams to keep everything balanced. No, it just means Kespa is legally in charge of the teams. What it means is that Khan will still exist even if Samsung no longer sponsors it, and Kespa will be better positioned to find a new sponsor. | ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
OSC
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
LAN Event
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
