| Forum Index > BW General |
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
On August 02 2011 09:21 lizzard_warish wrote: Am I the only one who doesnt give even two shits about the KESPA ranking? It's beyond horrible. Then why are you posting in the thread about it? Clearly you hold some interest and care in it. | ||
|
gen.Sun
United States539 Posts
On August 02 2011 13:45 TwoToneTerran wrote: Then why are you posting in the thread about it? Clearly you hold some interest and care in it. I like it a lot more than ELO. Fanboys want to believe that Bisu is actually doing better than Zero and Hydra. Nah, not true. | ||
|
rift
1819 Posts
KeSPA = general league success, winning an overall series matters more KeSPA is also slower to update, while Elo is instant. It's preference really. i prefer Elo; Bisu is demolishing Proleague and has a 75% win rate, he's doing just as well as Flash this year. | ||
|
Katsuge
Singapore7730 Posts
On August 02 2011 14:33 rift wrote: Elo = actual success in terms of games won / loss against certain players KeSPA = general league success, winning an overall series matters more KeSPA is also slower to update, while Elo is instant. It's preference really. i prefer Elo; Bisu is demolishing Proleague and has a 75% win rate, he's doing just as well as Flash this year. well the fact that hes demolishing proleague but yet failing in individual leagues does not make him any better than the top four ranking imo. All of them have general success in proleague and also maintaining a decent progress in individual leagues.~ i find KeSPA ranking more reliable. :/ | ||
|
nodule
Canada931 Posts
On August 01 2011 17:19 TwoToneTerran wrote: It is absolutely impossible for Kespa Ranking to be biased, as it acts on a completely strict formula. But that algorithm was designed with a bias against Bisu since it counts OSL + Show Spoiler +  | ||
|
Svennedude
Belgium86 Posts
| ||
|
ggggbabybabybaby
Canada304 Posts
Slumpy McSlumperson. | ||
|
hellbound
United Kingdom2242 Posts
On August 21 2011 03:59 ggggbabybabybaby wrote: When was the last time Jaedong was 3rd Zerg? Slumpy McSlumperson. Way too harsh, this is more a result of others catching up than JD failing. I'd really contend anyone claiming that he is performing below 80% of his historical potential. With the exception of Effort JD has been the only zerg to be able to achieve things for way too long. And now 5 Z's in the top 10. If anything this is a demonstration of the newly found strength of the race. Zerg power supreme. | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
Flash back on top, all is well in the world <3 JD narrowly behind 2nd 3rd place :T | ||
|
legaton
France1763 Posts
Forever your fan Jaedong! | ||
|
trexbqs
Malaysia1731 Posts
And Stats in top 10. awesome. | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
On August 21 2011 08:44 hellbound wrote: Way too harsh, this is more a result of others catching up than JD failing. I'd really contend anyone claiming that he is performing below 80% of his historical potential. With the exception of Effort JD has been the only zerg to be able to achieve things for way too long. And now 5 Z's in the top 10. If anything this is a demonstration of the newly found strength of the race. Zerg power supreme. It feels like theres been 5 zergs in the top 10 for a long time. I remember always seeing JD, Effort, Zero, Kwanro, and Calm in there about a year ago. | ||
|
VGhost
United States3618 Posts
On August 02 2011 14:33 rift wrote: Elo = actual success in terms of games won / loss against certain players KeSPA = general league success, winning an overall series matters more KeSPA is also slower to update, while Elo is instant. It's preference really. i prefer Elo; Bisu is demolishing Proleague and has a 75% win rate, he's doing just as well as Flash this year. ELO favors PL because PL has more games played. Not only that, but almost no one in Starleagues matches the top players' PL win-rates, both because of the caliber of the competition and because of the format. KeSPA ranking favors the Starleagues at least a little bit, and mostly because it's designed to do so. While both have issues, I feel that overall KeSPA is the most equitable in terms of representing "results" (league wins as well as PL play) since the SC scene is hybrid, while ELO is better at representing what might be called either "quality of play" or "consistency". | ||
|
Rainmaker5
United States1027 Posts
| ||
|
Taekwon
United States8155 Posts
| ||
|
hellbound
United Kingdom2242 Posts
On August 21 2011 09:20 Bibbit wrote: It feels like theres been 5 zergs in the top 10 for a long time. I remember always seeing JD, Effort, Zero, Kwanro, and Calm in there about a year ago. Ok, how about 3 zergs in the top 4 then? | ||
|
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
Edit: nvm just read through the thread... has been discussed already | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
Heh, yeah thats pretty good. =) | ||
|
1a2a3a[MB]
United States297 Posts
| ||
|
djbhINDI
United States372 Posts
| ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
BSL
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
herO vs TriGGeR
NightMare vs Solar
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
