EPTWhat i mean is that when you play on battle net, there is always a small delay between your moves of about 0.5 seconds on low latency...doing dropship micro like boxer on battle net and extra high latency is just impossible.
iloveoov, best sc player? - Page 5
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
FloOfy
Canada57 Posts
What i mean is that when you play on battle net, there is always a small delay between your moves of about 0.5 seconds on low latency...doing dropship micro like boxer on battle net and extra high latency is just impossible. | ||
|
likeboxer
Korea (South)465 Posts
On March 15 2004 13:38 x[ReaPeR]x wrote: With Oov in the Challenge Leauge. I firmly believe that he simply wasn't trying. There is no way anyone can be the best in the world, then just take a break for a few weeks, then go back to being the best in the world. In terms of all time, ILoveOov isn't as good as NaDa or BoxeR, but right now he is a lot better. agree | ||
|
rOm
Latvia1208 Posts
And besides, nada has waaay more experience than oov. | ||
|
Bill and Bill
United States167 Posts
He is not better than nada. end of story. you can't just go by who is the best because they win one little league. i remember when xellos 3-0'd boxer everyone was like OMG XEllos!! then Nal_ra wins something and everyone is like OMG NAL_Ra best player!! | ||
|
HnR)hT
United States3468 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
 OOV is NOT better than nada. WTF? Nada was raping everyone consistently and now that oov is doing it that means he is automatically better than nada? Your just so used to nada raping everyone you dont realize it but since oov got great your just realizing it. | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On March 15 2004 14:53 Ace wrote: i hate wagonists that claim a rising star is better than everyone else because there on a streak OOV isnt NOT better than nada. WTF? Nada was raping everyone consistently and now that oov is doing it that means he is automatically better than nada? Your just so used to nada raping everyone you dont realize it but since oov got great your just realizing it. ILoveOov is on a streak RIGHT NOW and therefore is the best player in the world RIGHT NOW... | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I hope jinnam goes on a 10 game winning streak so we can all claim him the best player. | ||
|
Schnake
Germany2819 Posts
On March 15 2004 14:24 rOm wrote: Around 500 games by nada, to 100 by Oov.. you can't compare them. And besides, nada has waaay more experience than oov. Yes. Absolutely! | ||
|
maleorderbride
United States2916 Posts
On March 15 2004 14:56 x[ReaPeR]x wrote: ILoveOov is on a streak RIGHT NOW and therefore is the best player in the world RIGHT NOW... As much as I hate to agree with a bastard like HovZ, I think this is exactly what he is referring to. Just because someone is the best, according to winning a tournament, that does not mean he is the best player. Technically Oov IS the best, but I think many people would agree that in reality, as in overall, he is not the best. One tournament does not prove you are the best player. Even two tournaments does not. A classic counter-example for anyone that thinks oov is the best can look at Ogogo. Were you the same people that argued that he is better than everyone else? Do you really think that Ogogo is better than Boxer, or Nada, or Nal_rA, or practically ANY of the pro players? Of course not, that shows that stats and winning a tournament are merely indicators and not the final word on Whos Who in BW. HovZ did overstep himself, as he almost always does, and made an all encompassing, sweeping generalization about all of BW and all tournaments. HOwever, if you take everything HovZ says, and reduce the "volume" by about half and ignore the trash talking, he sometimes accidently has some realistic statments hidden in the post. I can feel some empathy since I sometimes exaggerated something when I feel strongly about it. Maybe HovZ simply feels very strongly about himself being right in every single situation.  | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On March 15 2004 15:10 maleorderbride wrote: As much as I hate to agree with a bastard like HovZ, I think this is exactly what he is referring to. Just because someone is the best, according to winning a tournament, that does not mean he is the best player. Technically Oov IS the best, but I think many people would agree that in reality, as in overall, he is not the best. One tournament does not prove you are the best player. Even two tournaments does not. A classic counter-example for anyone that thinks oov is the best can look at Ogogo. Were you the same people that argued that he is better than everyone else? Do you really think that Ogogo is better than Boxer, or Nada, or Nal_rA, or practically ANY of the pro players? Of course not, that shows that stats and winning a tournament are merely indicators and not the final word on Whos Who in BW. HovZ did overstep himself, as he almost always does, and made an all encompassing, sweeping generalization about all of BW and all tournaments. HOwever, if you take everything HovZ says, and reduce the "volume" by about half and ignore the trash talking, he sometimes accidently has some realistic statments hidden in the post. I can feel some empathy since I sometimes exaggerated something when I feel strongly about it. Maybe HovZ simply feels very strongly about himself being right in every single situation. Ogogo winning WCG isn't nearly anything compared to what ILoveOov did. Think about the competition at WCG. Although some of the players there were very good (such as FisheYe and Elky), the competition there simply isn't anything compared to what ILoveOov has done: 3-1 vs NaDa Dominating Multiple Team Leauges 3-0 vs YellOw Winning MBC Game Utter Domination of many many good players. I don't know how you can compare Ogogo winning WCG to what ILoveOov has done. Although he sometimes says statements that are too broad, HovZ is almost always right. I just don't think that in this case he is taking into accouint ILoveOov's utter domination of coutless elite players. | ||
|
GoDHovZ
United States1869 Posts
| ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On March 15 2004 15:42 GoDHovZ wrote: yes cuz 1 series v nada is the be all end all of skill judgment. That's just one example out of his whole list of stuff he has done... | ||
|
GoDHovZ
United States1869 Posts
| ||
|
SW)RIF
United States563 Posts
And with Boxer's triumphs and long list of experiences hes automatically the top in the world right now too, right? I guess him being lack luster for the last months/year doesnt mean anything. Obviously experience and players history means more than the present. No one has claimed Oov to be the best the game has ever saw, the amount of games played bit is old in this thread aswell. i guess you have no concept of time, because then some of you guys would understand what the emphasis of NOW meant. He is playing great now, and possibly at a level higher than even Nada and Nal_Ra, making him the best.... now.... | ||
|
A3iL3r0n
United States2196 Posts
No. | ||
|
SW)RIF
United States563 Posts
 I think you confused best in the world right now, with the best ever, which not one person has claimed. So A3iL3r0n go away~ | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On March 15 2004 15:58 GoDHovZ wrote: and nadas list is 10x bigger and better than iloves What has NaDa done RECENTLY compared to Oov? | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On March 15 2004 16:01 SW)RIF wrote: And with Boxer's triumphs and long list of experiences hes automatically the top in the world right now too, right? I guess him being lack luster for the last months/year doesnt mean anything. Obviously experience and players history means more than the present. No one has claimed Oov to be the best the game has ever saw, the amount of games played bit is old in this thread aswell. i guess you have no concept of time, because then some of you guys would understand what the emphasis of NOW meant. He is playing great now, and possibly at a level higher than even Nada and Nal_Ra, making him the best.... now.... Amen brotha. | ||
|
ApollyoN
United States1297 Posts
On March 15 2004 16:18 x[ReaPeR]x wrote: What has NaDa done RECENTLY compared to Oov? only won the biggest money tourney ever, while only losing 1 game in the whole thing? | ||
| ||
