• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:32
CEST 18:32
KST 01:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18902 users

Randomness...again - Page 2

Blogs > Cpt Obvious
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
iNcontroL *
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
USA29055 Posts
May 03 2009 09:21 GMT
#21
interesting I randomly read this blog and found I was mentioned, neat.
Etherone
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States1898 Posts
May 03 2009 09:50 GMT
#22


i had a similar discussion with my brother about 7 months ago, and my first answer was the gist of the conclusion we came too, it was of course accompanied by a few lines of reasoning, but ultimately
it was something similar with a small part that i omitted.

that part is basically that we are forced into a logical corner where we ,as insecure people, felt the need to rationalize our existence in the afore mentioned way and a few variants ( I.E god), as bleak as it sounds.

he believes in god, to an extent, and not the church per say, just a higher being, and that jesus christ sacrif..etc. any who, i confronted him once again, believing he is just copping out of rationally mulling existence over.
the way i went about it was somewhat convoluted (details will be omitted ) in generally i goated him into it by stating something similar to what you ( cpt.obvious) but of course much more dramatic and with out the links and references, since it was a live discussion. he of course tried to console me and knowing that trying to convince me god existed would utterly fail, he tried by putting his mind to work searching out a common meaning to life.

he failed because he was thinking simply on a personal basis.

Initially as a child (8-12) i wanted to become a zoologist, mostly on the assumption that "animals" were the purest form of life in our world and i found that beautiful. that assumption was based on the premise that all animals act out of instinct. this is relevant because i applied this logic to humanity and tried then to rationalize the question through view.

an "animal's" goal in life is simple, survival.

can't our meaning for living be that simple, with the slight modifications that we strive to prosper, and our goal for survival is not limited only to ourselves?

of course i accept that we are limited beings and not all of us have the capacity to unravel these mysteries. I am willing to live my life out simply waiting for another Copernicus/Kepler/Newton/Einstein to reveal himself and shake the very foundations of our paradigm on the subject.

also I accept that death is the end for me as potential (nothing i was or did will then after have the possibility of becoming reality). i hope of course that my accomplishments and my thoughts live on after me through others, but that is only hope.

PS: for the record the reason i engaged my brother is that he is far more intelligent and educated than i am and i wanted him to give me an answer.
Cpt Obvious
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Germany3073 Posts
May 03 2009 18:39 GMT
#23
Gratz on the engagement, but isn't that kind of illegal, even in Canada?

Anyway, thanks for the responses so far. I am very pleased that so many actually understood what I was trying to say, and, in my eyes, failed to make as clear as it could have been. Especially the guy telling me to have an open mind, I will do my best to do that.
Nobody ever reads signatures of people like me, do they?
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
May 03 2009 21:56 GMT
#24
On May 03 2009 18:21 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
interesting I randomly read this blog and found I was mentioned, neat.


bullshit u searched for yourself

+ Show Spoiler +

im not serious. but i could still be right!
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-04 10:23:37
May 04 2009 03:21 GMT
#25
On May 03 2009 09:54 Cpt Obvious wrote:
Maybe you're right. Maybe I am looking for a "grand unified truth" that just isn't there. Still, on some subjects I find it incredibly hard to come to a decision which I can be happy with. I'd go as far as calling it a disability to make a call and then live with the consequences.

Apart from that, I really like how philosophy intersects with science here. The methods are not that different either, from what I gather. I am a big fan of Russell as well, but I haven't really read that much about his work or that of the others.

What baffled me most about all this is how conservatively the scientific world reacted to the implications of Gödel's and Boltzmann's propositions. I was strongly reminded of how the church reacted towards Galilei, and I would never have thought that scientists could be so stubborn. Come to think of it, I think I remember hearing Einstein heavily opposed Quantum theory until his death. Oh well, nothing is black-and-white I guess.

Haha, I know exactly how you feel. I will tell you what many people have probably told you (and me) already: "You think too much".

There's really no way around it...the best way to get past this is to just submit to the fact that it's something we'll probably never satisfactorily figure out. ):

On May 03 2009 12:46 Makhno wrote:
Very interesting stuff and a great challange to your mind. I can certainly see what your problems derive from and it really is something that the human mind is (up to this point at least) incapable of grasping. Personally I don't think this has anything to do with a god or anything of the sort, but more with the fundamental flaws in human thinking and how incomplete our understanding of our existence is. We are capable of some truly amazing feats of abstract thinking, but obviously there are limits. Inifinity, uncertainty and mathematical paradoxes are some of these concepts which are basically unfathomable to the human mind yet conceivable in their unsolved form.

I think the problem is rather mundane. A mechanical fallibility in our ability to comprehend existance and all the laws, logics and paradoxes that comes with it. A neurological impairity. Impurity if you will. Just think about some of the things these mathematicians and physicists claimed, that there are problems that are unsolvable and that you actually cannot know which problems are. Is it even possible for an entity that we can hypothesize about to solve these unsolvable problems and find structure where we believe to have proven that no structure is to be found?

It's a great topic of discussion, 5/5.

I disagree with this statement. All the fields of the sciences and philosophy, in the end, work to do the same one thing: Make explicit what we already implicitly know or can plainly observe. That's as far as any empirical discipline can go.

With that in mind, we have actually come very far with what you seem to be implying are "neurological impairities". In addition, what you're saying implies that there is an underlying order, a pure logic and rationality to the universe.

First off, I think that our own existence is really something we know and understand very well. People become frustrated and dissatisfied with it when they can't explicate it; hence why philosophy has been obsessed with it for ages. Reading some of Heidegger (whether you agree with him or not) really lets this sink in...our existence is quite simple, really (I know this is kind of a short and gay answer, but I can't really think of a way to condense it to a sentence or two right now).

Second, as I wrote about in my previous post in this blog, as things are looking now, mathematics and logic do not hold up against the universe free of psychologicism...that is to say some kind of human/intuitive input. Set theory, which modern mathematics and even philosophical logic are based on, is still questioned under those regards. There is no reason to think that the universe is bound by any real kind of order, or if we're just observing purely coincidental phenomenon in its function and our inference. I don't like this idea either, but sadly, that's how it is.

The physics and metaphysics of the universe may very well be unsolvable, but I sincerely hope that is not the case.

On May 03 2009 17:10 Xela wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2009 09:31 Cpt Obvious wrote:
On May 03 2009 08:17 daz wrote:
just enjoy your life. your overthinking it


I think the problem is rather that 99% of the people underthink it. And don't bother telling me underthink is not a word, because it totally should be.

Exactly what I think too.

Alot of people just begin to think about these things(god/meaning of life etc) and then make their idea as fast as possible and are stuck in that way of thinking for the rest of their life. IMO, people should think about those things and create their own ideas all their life, but the problems we humans have is that we NEED an answer and unfortunately like you said: there is no clear answer to fundamental questions. So instead of constently re-think about it and change their minds, people in general just choose an already made answer (religions) for all those questions.

I mean, it's so much easier to have someone telling you what to think and what to do in every circumstances. "Does god really exists?" "What should I do if he do(not) exist?". You could wake up every morning for all your life asking yourself those questions, you would never have a clear answer. Or you could make your mind in 2-3 days and act accordingly for the rest of your life trying to hide away from different ideas so your beliefs are not challenged.

You're assuming that any person who ascribes to any kind of religion or system of beliefs they didn't come up with themselves is an inauthentic coward who chooses not to think for themselves at all.

I think you're being unfair, and are, to put it simply and bluntly, arrogant and wrong.

On May 03 2009 18:50 Etherone wrote:


i had a similar discussion with my brother about 7 months ago, and my first answer was the gist of the conclusion we came too, it was of course accompanied by a few lines of reasoning, but ultimately
it was something similar with a small part that i omitted.

that part is basically that we are forced into a logical corner where we ,as insecure people, felt the need to rationalize our existence in the afore mentioned way and a few variants ( I.E god), as bleak as it sounds.

he believes in god, to an extent, and not the church per say, just a higher being, and that jesus christ sacrif..etc. any who, i confronted him once again, believing he is just copping out of rationally mulling existence over.
the way i went about it was somewhat convoluted (details will be omitted ) in generally i goated him into it by stating something similar to what you ( cpt.obvious) but of course much more dramatic and with out the links and references, since it was a live discussion. he of course tried to console me and knowing that trying to convince me god existed would utterly fail, he tried by putting his mind to work searching out a common meaning to life.

he failed because he was thinking simply on a personal basis.

Initially as a child (8-12) i wanted to become a zoologist, mostly on the assumption that "animals" were the purest form of life in our world and i found that beautiful. that assumption was based on the premise that all animals act out of instinct. this is relevant because i applied this logic to humanity and tried then to rationalize the question through view.

an "animal's" goal in life is simple, survival.

can't our meaning for living be that simple, with the slight modifications that we strive to prosper, and our goal for survival is not limited only to ourselves?

of course i accept that we are limited beings and not all of us have the capacity to unravel these mysteries. I am willing to live my life out simply waiting for another Copernicus/Kepler/Newton/Einstein to reveal himself and shake the very foundations of our paradigm on the subject.

also I accept that death is the end for me as potential (nothing i was or did will then after have the possibility of becoming reality). i hope of course that my accomplishments and my thoughts live on after me through others, but that is only hope.

PS: for the record the reason i engaged my brother is that he is far more intelligent and educated than i am and i wanted him to give me an answer.

What I don't understand is why believing in a higher power (some kind of "god-entity") always seems to cause this "cop-out" reaction. It is a horrible thing to say that all religious/spiritualist/whatever people are such cowards or non-thinkers on such a basis.

You kind of contradict yourself, however. You criticized your brother because he left much of the implications of his existence up to a higher power, yet you are doing effectively the same thing. You said you would wait for "another Copernicus/Kepler/Newton/Einstein to...shake the very foundations of our paradigm on the subject". You are doing effectively the same thing as your brother, but it is perhaps even shakier at its foundations. Instead of looking to a being perceived to be superior in whatever way, you're looking to another human being whom you will perceive to be superior in whatever way.

Also, this is just my personal opinion, but I think that there is a HUGE difference between living for survival and living for prosperity...especially when trying to apply the word "prosperity" to man as they be today.
Hello
DeathSpank
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1029 Posts
May 04 2009 03:49 GMT
#26
You can't prove or disprove God. Its futile to even try. All we can do is try to learn and understand more about our universe. As for the continuum theory...Cantor was looking at infinite in a very odd way...you can't quantify something that has no beginning and no end.That's what infinite is, it has no bounds..its no wonder why he went mad...and everyone else who tried to solve it as well.
yes.
Xela
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada203 Posts
May 04 2009 04:26 GMT
#27
On May 04 2009 12:21 PH wrote:



Show nested quote +
On May 03 2009 17:10 Xela wrote:
On May 03 2009 09:31 Cpt Obvious wrote:
On May 03 2009 08:17 daz wrote:
just enjoy your life. your overthinking it


I think the problem is rather that 99% of the people underthink it. And don't bother telling me underthink is not a word, because it totally should be.

Exactly what I think too.

Alot of people just begin to think about these things(god/meaning of life etc) and then make their idea as fast as possible and are stuck in that way of thinking for the rest of their life. IMO, people should think about those things and create their own ideas all their life, but the problems we humans have is that we NEED an answer and unfortunately like you said: there is no clear answer to fundamental questions. So instead of constently re-think about it and change their minds, people in general just choose an already made answer (religions) for all those questions.

I mean, it's so much easier to have someone telling you what to think and what to do in every circumstances. "Does god really exists?" "What should I do if he do(not) exist?". You could wake up every morning for all your life asking yourself those questions, you would never have a clear answer. Or you could make your mind in 2-3 days and act accordingly for the rest of your life trying to hide away from different ideas so your beliefs are not challenged.

You're assuming that any person who ascribes to any kind of religion or system of beliefs they didn't come up with themselves is an inauthentic coward who chooses not to think for themselves at all.

I think you're being unfair, and are, to put it simply and bluntly, arrogant and wrong.

I agree it was a bit arrogant, maybe I should say "most" and not "every" peope following a religion is someone who can't think for himself. I mean, I know alot of people who are constantly asking questions about religion, god, they don't accept everything their religion says 100% of the time and they still follow this system of beliefs. However, you gotta agree that those people are a minority and that at least 90% of others are just sheeps beliveing what they're told to believe, doing what they're told to do.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
May 04 2009 06:09 GMT
#28
On May 04 2009 13:26 Xela wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2009 12:21 PH wrote:



On May 03 2009 17:10 Xela wrote:
On May 03 2009 09:31 Cpt Obvious wrote:
On May 03 2009 08:17 daz wrote:
just enjoy your life. your overthinking it


I think the problem is rather that 99% of the people underthink it. And don't bother telling me underthink is not a word, because it totally should be.

Exactly what I think too.

Alot of people just begin to think about these things(god/meaning of life etc) and then make their idea as fast as possible and are stuck in that way of thinking for the rest of their life. IMO, people should think about those things and create their own ideas all their life, but the problems we humans have is that we NEED an answer and unfortunately like you said: there is no clear answer to fundamental questions. So instead of constently re-think about it and change their minds, people in general just choose an already made answer (religions) for all those questions.

I mean, it's so much easier to have someone telling you what to think and what to do in every circumstances. "Does god really exists?" "What should I do if he do(not) exist?". You could wake up every morning for all your life asking yourself those questions, you would never have a clear answer. Or you could make your mind in 2-3 days and act accordingly for the rest of your life trying to hide away from different ideas so your beliefs are not challenged.

You're assuming that any person who ascribes to any kind of religion or system of beliefs they didn't come up with themselves is an inauthentic coward who chooses not to think for themselves at all.

I think you're being unfair, and are, to put it simply and bluntly, arrogant and wrong.

I agree it was a bit arrogant, maybe I should say "most" and not "every" peope following a religion is someone who can't think for himself. I mean, I know alot of people who are constantly asking questions about religion, god, they don't accept everything their religion says 100% of the time and they still follow this system of beliefs. However, you gotta agree that those people are a minority and that at least 90% of others are just sheeps beliveing what they're told to believe, doing what they're told to do.

I don't know about 90%, or even a majority (at least I'd like to think it's not a majority). Even then, it depends on how much one needs to question in order to not be a "sheep". You don't have to and shouldn't have to doubt and question constantly, and in fact, you can't, in order to be a Christian, or whatever. I don't think it's a bad thing to not doubt or question either. I don't like it when people aren't open-minded about whatever their beliefs may be, but that's really not asking for that much. You can't expect someone who considers themselves a part of whatever belief system (be it religious, agnostic, atheist, or whatever) to be actively doubtful of it. That's just ridiculous. When you ask a devout Christian to doubt the existence of God, that's like asking an atheist to doubt the non-existence of one.

Personally, I don't really have a problem with the majority of religious people out there. In fact, they tend to be the more mature and happier people, from my experience. I can even take people who have never even thought twice about it. If it makes them happy, then what separates them from us, who seek fulfillment/happiness through questioning?

I have a problem with the evangelists who won't leave me alone, the ones who go out of their way to tell me to fix my ways/that I'm doomed to hell/etc. The ones who take it personally that I don't ascribe to the same their same beliefs and who make it a mission to change my ways, or the ones who take offense at it somehow, are the problem ones.

The majority of Christians are not like that. They are a vast minority, in fact. It only seems like they're all like that because the annoying ones are the only ones who stop you on the street.
Hello
thez
Profile Joined August 2003
Canada65 Posts
May 04 2009 09:27 GMT
#29
All answers lie in two areas of thought. force and form. The unifying factors are force and form. All religions are force and form. All parts of Starcraft are force and form. Everything that goes on inside our head are force and form. Black holes are force and form. God is a force and a form that we can not see with our forces and forms. Matter is force and form. Light is force and form. Radiation and electricity is force and form. Emotions are force and form. Force creates form. God is force. God is all knowing and all powerful. God is force and connection. Connection is two forces interacting with one another. Some forces and forms are disconnected with each other and change independently, and then this force becomes different from that force and then they begin running into each other. You are struggling with answers because some forces and forms in your head are disconnected with other forces and forms in your head. Force and form is the unifying factors to all answers. Anything without force and form is leaving something to be grasped at, something to be missed What is numbers, two forces and forms separated. Infinity is force. We live in a stable and separated version of force and form which provides great difficulties to our mind and our person. An artist creates forms with their pencils wave this way wave that way this straight line to a right angle to another straight line and then a curve and another curve. Force creates form. Separation of forms by force provide the definition of all numbers and quantities. We live in a separated world. That's what makes and creates difficulties. In a connected world everything becomes one, wholeness, divine, all the religious mumble jumble you want to hear. It's sacred ! I know i am being repetitious, and i mean to be because the more i repeat the basic fundamentals with the more complicated, the more you see it all connect. It provides emphasis to those thoughts most important.

>I disagree with this statement. All the fields of the sciences and philosophy, in the end, work to >do the same one thing: Make explicit what we already implicitly know or can plainly observe. >That's as far as any empirical discipline can go.
These are some of the wisest words i have come across in a long time. Any communication that i impart to you will include many simple parts that you have all observed in the past that may make up a whole that may be different than any of the simpler parts alone. All simple parts that i impart to you will be force and form. Any complex forms that i impart to you may be cats, dogs, bananas, the unified theory of simplicity, the uncertainty principle, the watever principle some famous philosopher stewed up in his head after years of toil and trouble that includes all this jargon and eccentric thought that make simple ideas more complicated than they should be to grasp. An example of this is in the video you presented. The first guy attempted to quantify infinity, but infinity is just that, infinite, and completely obscure without the concepts of force, form, separation, connection. Yet we always try to quantify what we have around us, but we can not quantify infinity in any way because it has no bounds. Infinity is the product of energy continuing or ending, both making up an infinity, constant expansion and contraction, separation and connection. All the verbs in the English language are the mental thoughts that define things that can be infinite. And at the same time the specifics of these verbs can be very finite, like a feeling or a lifting of a foot of a single person. But if you take all these thoughts and generalize them to every person and every thing that experiences them it becomes repetitious and infinite. It happens everywhere. So it could be the general and the connected is infinite. But the separated is finite. I have no idea if i make any sense at all to other people. I want to make sense to other people because i want to grant the same peace of mind to others that clairty has brought me. Please provide feedback.
Cpt Obvious
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Germany3073 Posts
May 05 2009 20:54 GMT
#30
On May 04 2009 15:09 PH wrote (amongst a LOT of other things):
I don't know about 90%, or even a majority (at least I'd like to think it's not a majority). Even then, it depends on how much one needs to question in order to not be a "sheep". You don't have to and shouldn't have to doubt and question constantly, and in fact, you can't, in order to be a Christian, or whatever. I don't think it's a bad thing to not doubt or question either. I don't like it when people aren't open-minded about whatever their beliefs may be, but that's really not asking for that much. You can't expect someone who considers themselves a part of whatever belief system (be it religious, agnostic, atheist, or whatever) to be actively doubtful of it. That's just ridiculous. When you ask a devout Christian to doubt the existence of God, that's like asking an atheist to doubt the non-existence of one.


Good point, but I disagree. As an agnostic, I feel compelled to question my belief every time a new argument is presented that suggests the existence of a higher being / a meaning to life / whatever. However, those are quite scarce
As a scientist, it is my hobby to doubt every set of new data, every new theory, everything. Even the ones that were believed to be true. Science works that way. There's a saying: "When theory and reality don't match, you have to alter either the theory or reality. The first is called science, the latter is called religion". It's religious' people incapability to EVER question their beliefs what gets me. I'm going to re-quote House AGAIN: If you could reason with religious people, there'd be no religious people.

Personally, I don't really have a problem with the majority of religious people out there. In fact, they tend to be the more mature and happier people, from my experience. I can even take people who have never even thought twice about it. If it makes them happy, then what separates them from us, who seek fulfillment/happiness through questioning?


Same here. I've even met Jehova's witnesses that didn't quite force their beliefs on me, and I had one hell of a conversation with them (pun fully intended). I have no problem with people believing whatever the feck they want, as long as they don't get offended when I go on one of my agnostic rants about how there's no God and no Heaven.

I have a problem with the evangelists who won't leave me alone, the ones who go out of their way to tell me to fix my ways/that I'm doomed to hell/etc. The ones who take it personally that I don't ascribe to the same their same beliefs and who make it a mission to change my ways, or the ones who take offense at it somehow, are the problem ones.

The majority of Christians are not like that. They are a vast minority, in fact. It only seems like they're all like that because the annoying ones are the only ones who stop you on the street.


I agree. However, they still exist. How many fanatic atheists/agnostics do you know? Furthermore, how many atheist organizations do you know of that TAKE YOUR MONEY because you don't believe in God. After all, that makes about as much sense as the other way, doesn't it?

I'm gonna stop here before I atheist-rage again, I find this topic utterly disturbing in a positive way and I get carried away sometimes

Thanks for all the responses guys, stay tuned for the next update, which is scheduled for 2011, statistically speaking.
Nobody ever reads signatures of people like me, do they?
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 28m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 271
ProTech74
EnDerr 23
MindelVK 15
JuggernautJason4
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7174
Sea 3124
Hyuk 1518
Rain 1233
Snow 422
Soulkey 173
Zeus 96
HiyA 61
Rush 49
hero 48
[ Show more ]
TY 35
Nal_rA 20
Noble 14
IntoTheRainbow 10
scan(afreeca) 6
zelot 5
Dota 2
Gorgc6307
qojqva3318
Fuzer 205
League of Legends
Dendi1591
Counter-Strike
fl0m5812
olofmeister2478
Foxcn682
rGuardiaN117
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude27
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor156
Other Games
FrodaN834
C9.Mang0747
Beastyqt543
Mlord493
crisheroes381
Hui .179
ArmadaUGS128
Mew2King118
elazer101
XaKoH 88
Trikslyr86
KnowMe83
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV857
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream703
Other Games
BasetradeTV34
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2936
• lizZardDota269
League of Legends
• Nemesis6255
• Jankos3298
• TFBlade1057
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 28m
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
7h 28m
OSC
7h 28m
WardiTV Invitational
18h 28m
OSC
20h 28m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 10h
SOOP
1d 16h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 17h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 18h
Cheesadelphia
1d 22h
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.