EPTwittgenstein, i think, did break this. although he didn't do it in writing i get the general attitude of it. i think this could be a way of looking at wittgenstein's work in a new light.
do we need metaphilosophy - Page 3
| Blogs > oneofthem |
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
wittgenstein, i think, did break this. although he didn't do it in writing i get the general attitude of it. i think this could be a way of looking at wittgenstein's work in a new light. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
and i htink representational usages are fine as long as they are being treated as ways of talking about things. they are not really good subjects for analytical analysis. the thing is pretty tricky. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
This puts foucault in a clearer light for me, he examines the subject and objects which are essentially short for transcendental subject and object, in society. Their origin, purpose, characteristics, etc Like sexuality is a quality of the western subject, which was created by medicinal and some other scientific discourses for some purpose, and he traces the history of this concept, and etc etc etc ec | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, most biased encyclopedia ever, 109310983 entries on russell, heidegger doesn't even get his own page | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5281 Posts
or, even if i don't speak it's language i can make it aware of things it does not understand by using floating points (viable projected frameworks). now, i am sure that the casual mechanism will not change it's values, it's truths, it's framework but when it 'evolves' it will possess both the truths of it's former self and those of the projected theories. floating point = a different casual mechanism that 'works', in the same environment (my refference point) as your mechanism. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
and i really dont think this is the right direction for this thing. what causal mechanism means is just the way the description 'describes' and gives the description seemingly valid substitutional value. | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5281 Posts
 what else could you say.i can guarantee you that if you will be able to define 'a what', and 'a how' (as principles of your casual mechanism) i will be able to describe 'a why' which will not only be influential to your mechanism but it will never be a part of it. (lulz i just realised that i wrote casual in all of my posts, instead of causal) | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On September 29 2007 15:33 zulu_nation8 wrote: i dont think i laid out the complete version of it, but at the moment it is not very smooth. maybe by next friday. i need to talk with mor epeople about htis. anyways upon second thought I think this is much more complicated, I will read a lot of stuff first | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
| ||
