The family was rightly outraged at this blatant violation of trust and integrity by both law enforcement and the gang members who they had previously regarded as civil. They had a great sense of urgency to exact vengeance and ensure justice was administered for such heinous crimes. The associated gang denied all allegations and claimed to have no knowledge pertaining to the incident. Indeed, it was possible that the gang may had not been affiliated and some poor men were searching for easy money. However that possibility highlighted the ineffectiveness of police officers who had a civic duty and promised to keep the family and their possessions in safe hands, night and day. The most likely explanation was that the perpetrators were young men outside the gang who were financially struggling and had been hired as con men to eliminate the mentally handicapped son and vandalize the family's personal property. The decision to employ those external to the organization was done to circumvent legal proceedings by complicating transparency. Finally, public sentiment surrounding the unfortunate incident had reached a boiling point: the people wanted the culprits who had committed so treacherous an act to be punished accordingly in the name of justice, social order, and civic harmony. The gang continued to deny their involvement in the matter but eventually offered five poor men with no ties to organized crime or any disciplinary records of misdemeanors as a form of consolation. The only crime these unlucky men had committed was being poor, so therefore no ethical or moral questions were raised when all five were sentenced to life imprisonment.
A True Story of Crime in My Family
Blogs > NeuroticPsychosis |
NeuroticPsychosis
United States322 Posts
The family was rightly outraged at this blatant violation of trust and integrity by both law enforcement and the gang members who they had previously regarded as civil. They had a great sense of urgency to exact vengeance and ensure justice was administered for such heinous crimes. The associated gang denied all allegations and claimed to have no knowledge pertaining to the incident. Indeed, it was possible that the gang may had not been affiliated and some poor men were searching for easy money. However that possibility highlighted the ineffectiveness of police officers who had a civic duty and promised to keep the family and their possessions in safe hands, night and day. The most likely explanation was that the perpetrators were young men outside the gang who were financially struggling and had been hired as con men to eliminate the mentally handicapped son and vandalize the family's personal property. The decision to employ those external to the organization was done to circumvent legal proceedings by complicating transparency. Finally, public sentiment surrounding the unfortunate incident had reached a boiling point: the people wanted the culprits who had committed so treacherous an act to be punished accordingly in the name of justice, social order, and civic harmony. The gang continued to deny their involvement in the matter but eventually offered five poor men with no ties to organized crime or any disciplinary records of misdemeanors as a form of consolation. The only crime these unlucky men had committed was being poor, so therefore no ethical or moral questions were raised when all five were sentenced to life imprisonment. | ||
mdb
Bulgaria4058 Posts
| ||
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
| ||
NeuroticPsychosis
United States322 Posts
On March 14 2014 21:59 mdb wrote: On March 14 2014 22:24 Deleuze wrote: | ||
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
| ||
NeuroticPsychosis
United States322 Posts
| ||
| ||