EPTEdit: Ok I checked the rules for the trading deadlines but it didn't say anything about the negotiations.
Staff Fantasy Proleague! - Page 3
| Blogs > monk. |
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
Edit: Ok I checked the rules for the trading deadlines but it didn't say anything about the negotiations. | ||
monk
United States8477 Posts
| ||
TheEmulator
28104 Posts
On January 07 2013 08:06 monk. wrote: We're mostly going to negotiate on skype as that's most convenient. We can negotiate whenever, but we can only execute trades between "weeks". This means weds-friday. I've offered some trades and suggested trades between parties, but so far no one has agreed to anything. If Kadaver offers me Flash I will agree to it  | ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
![[image loading]](/staff/monk/staffFPL/Resultsweek1c.png) KadaverBB vs Ver: Ver has the lead right now, but I don't see him keeping it as we move to day 4. Kadaver still has Flash/Best/JYP/EG-TL left to play on day 4 while Ver only has Bisu and soO, none of which are SKT1's aces. Plexa vs shz: Plexa's big hitters left are Hero and Wooki against shz's Action and KT Rolster. Pretty even match-up with a slight lead towards shz imo. But with shz leading by 4 points, I don't think Plexa will be able to make this up. monk vs TheEmulator: I take a sizable lead, and to be honest, I don't see TheEmulator coming back. The funny thing is that SKT1 and EG-TL are playing on day 4 and I have Taeja and SKT1 while Emulator has Fantasy and Revival/Zenio/Huk/EG-TL. Emulator basically needs Fantasy to not to well and Revival, Zenio, or Huk to all-kill for him to to take this. I haven't done the math, but it might actually be mathematically impossible for him to win this match. Pokebunny* vs Semioldguy: Pokebunny might seem to have a huge lead here, but Semioldguy still has two of the heaviest hitters in the league left to play, Rain and KT Rolster along with Stats/Crazy-Hydra/Dear. Pokebunny's potential is a lot lower on day 4 with only Bogus/hyvaa/Trap. Poke will really have to root for STX in STX vs KT Rolster. Pokebunny actually has 20 points instead of 18. free scored 8 points, not 6. | ||
|
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
| ||
|
TheEmulator
28104 Posts
| ||
|
Ammanas
Slovakia2166 Posts
Also, I like TheEmulator's team the best, followed by semioldguy and Pokebunny. | ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
 | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
TehV747
180 Posts
| ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
![[image loading]](/staff/monk/staffFPL/ResultsWeek1d.png) KadaverBB vs Ver: Unfortunately for Kadaver, I did count wrong and Ver actually won by a close 1 point. Plexa vs shz: I said Plexa wouldn't be able to make up his deficit in my last update, but boy was I wrong. Wooki starts performance and shoots him just a point over shz. monk vs TheEmulator: Again, I miscalled this one as well. Revival was pretty much TheEmulator's only chance to come back into this, and perform he did. Pokebunny vs Semioldguy: And finally we have a tie. Neither Pokebunny nor semioldguy's players did well at all in playday 4. Fortunately, they did equally poorly and thus have tied for last place. There are two things we've learned from the first play-day. First is that large point swings can be frequent and likely. None of the owners who were leading after play-day 3 actually won on play-day 4. Secondly, these matches can be very close. Two matches differed by one point and there was even a tie. Stay tuned for this week's trading and next week's lineups. | ||
|
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
TheEmulator
28104 Posts
| ||
shz
Germany2687 Posts
I love Wooki for all the points in regular FPL. But nice to see that KT Rolster is basically my ace. | ||
|
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
KadaverBB trades JYP/Cure with monk for sOs/Classic/Barracks. KadaverBB trades Shine with monk for Savage(Ryul2). This trade is a one week loan and will be reverted at the end of the week. | ||
|
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
Release(in preference order): Bear Claim(in preference order): sola, ssask, myungsik, penguin, miso | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
I'm curious as to see how drafting would have changed had you limited it to one team per player, thus essentially turning a team pick into as coveted a pick as a top notch player. | ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
On January 12 2013 01:13 Roffles wrote: I got a quick question. What's the reasoning behind drafting 2 teams? Is it because you want to allow flexibility by allowing players to pick up an additional team to stash on the bench in case their main team faces tough matchups or is underperforming? That's part of the reason. The main reason is to allow some flexibility in trading. If there's 8 teams and 8 owners, everyone is almost stuck with the team they have unless you do some really creative trading. Also, if you don't have a good team in this game, you're almost kind of screwed. This isn't BW anymore where all teams(save Air Force ACE) were decent. Another reason we did it is that the player pool is relatively shallow for how many owners we had. An ideal game with this player pool would probably only consist of 6-7 players. I'm curious as to see how drafting would have changed had you limited it to one team per player, thus essentially turning a team pick into as coveted a pick as a top notch player. I'm pretty sure everyone would go for the best teams first (KT, EG-TL, Woongjin, SK-T1) then the best players. At least, that's what I would do. | ||
| ||
