EPTYou say live on a happy note but your blog post seems rather angry. I can't take anything you say seriously in this post.
Why don't people hear what they don't want to hear - Page 2
| Blogs > Thaniri |
|
gosublade
632 Posts
You say live on a happy note but your blog post seems rather angry. I can't take anything you say seriously in this post. | ||
|
matiK23
United States963 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
Thaniri
1264 Posts
That word has no meaning to me. People seem to be misreading. I referred to my friends as my haven from the fake. I don't go around insulting everyone and telling people what I think, what is fact. I get to do that amongst my friends because that's what gets us through. Call me an arrogant non-conformist teenager. I don't stand for 'be different than everyone else.' Rather, 'have individuality by your own right.' This question on what morality is an interesting one. If you want we can come back to times gone by. It used to be normal for people to have multiple wives. It used to be normal to not treat a woman with equality. The Canadian Constitution spent about 100 years where women were not actually considered 'people.' Slaves were actually thought of as less than human. Rather than try to finish that thought at all I'll let it sit. This thread has magically derailed into 'what is truth, what is morality?' I won't pretend to know the answers to the questions I will have thrown at me. And I will hopefully enjoy the challenge of taking them on. So, maybe in a few years if I remember at all to look at this. I will realize what a fool I am, but for now this puts thought to words and lets people challenge me for it. | ||
|
SatelliteNoodles
220 Posts
And yeah, loosen up a bit. Edit: lol a 2nd page, my phone sucks it didn't display the page list properly ;( | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
The Babylonians had a good system of conquest, join or die. Bad blog, poorly written, whiny. Please learn your Mesopotamian history. I get the impression that you think the Neo-Assyrians = the Babylonians (which .... uhhhhh, no), and even then, the Neo-Assyrians didn't really have an actual policy of "join us or die." | ||
|
meguca
United States78 Posts
On April 04 2012 12:01 Thaniri wrote: That word has no meaning to me. it does to others. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
The word self-entitled is very nasty and often gets used inappropriately, but this is one case where it's completely accurate. Everyone has been in classes where there is one idiot who doesn't have much understanding of a topic but insists on arguing with the professor. Everyone hates that kid. You are that kid who doesn't bother to learn about the issues of which he has such fervent opinions that he must share them with the world and waste other's time. | ||
|
rel
Guam3521 Posts
| ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
| ||
|
MrBakchoy
Canada3 Posts
People lie because there is an incentive for them to lie. By lying, they maximize their utility. If I am understanding this correctly, you feel you are entitled to them acting in such a way that their utility is not maximized. Why do you think you are so special? | ||
|
SolaR-
United States2685 Posts
| ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Ah the joys of being an angsty teenager. Hopefully he's taking it better than I did :< | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
| ||
|
run.at.me
Australia550 Posts
On April 04 2012 12:01 Thaniri wrote: The word faggot has been beaten to death. If I walk up to a bunch of gay guys and call them faggots, I am discriminating. If I call you a faggot, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation I am just using a word. That word has no meaning to me. People seem to be misreading. I referred to my friends as my haven from the fake. I don't go around insulting everyone and telling people what I think, what is fact. I get to do that amongst my friends because that's what gets us through. Call me an arrogant non-conformist teenager. I don't stand for 'be different than everyone else.' Rather, 'have individuality by your own right.' This question on what morality is an interesting one. If you want we can come back to times gone by. It used to be normal for people to have multiple wives. It used to be normal to not treat a woman with equality. The Canadian Constitution spent about 100 years where women were not actually considered 'people.' Slaves were actually thought of as less than human. Rather than try to finish that thought at all I'll let it sit. This thread has magically derailed into 'what is truth, what is morality?' I won't pretend to know the answers to the questions I will have thrown at me. And I will hopefully enjoy the challenge of taking them on. So, maybe in a few years if I remember at all to look at this. I will realize what a fool I am, but for now this puts thought to words and lets people challenge me for it. This thread has gone no where near the topic of what morality is. It has evolved into the attempt of making you realize the extent of your douche-baggery. Who cares about the definition of morality. That's not what your post even slightly attends to. You realize morality is subjective. Grats! You want a challenge? Acknowledge that there are millions of people more insightful and intelligent than you. Better looking than you. Warmer than you. This is truth.. | ||
|
W2
United States1177 Posts
I am extremely selective with whom I choose to spend my time at lunch break. Do me a favor and come back and see what you wrote in a couple years. LOL@the replies. You want people to give it to you straight? You got it. Angsty teenager, that's a good one. | ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
On April 04 2012 12:18 babylon wrote: This actually reminds me of Catcher in the Rye, but less entertaining. Catcher in the Rye wasn't even all that entertaining in the first place though. It was kind of pathetic and aggravating to read. Which was probably intentional. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
| ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On April 04 2012 12:21 Gamegene wrote: Catcher in the Rye wasn't even all that entertaining in the first place though. It was kind of pathetic and aggravating to read. Which was probably intentional. Yes, I actually hated it too. Which says something about this post, I guess. At least Catcher was well-written. | ||
|
sapht
Sweden141 Posts
On April 04 2012 12:18 babylon wrote: This actually reminds me of Catcher in the Rye, but less entertaining. Ah, beat me to it. It almost feels like fanfic. So much angst. The world is difficult to read with clouded eyes. Intelligence is a non-factor here. That book was good for many reasons, none of them being sympathy for the protagonist. I think I had actually started liking other people around 16 though. Softness is nice. | ||
| ||
