• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:01
CEST 18:01
KST 01:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou7Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed The New Patch Killed Mech! Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? The Lose More Card BW General Discussion BSL Season 21 OGN to release AI-upscaled StarLeague from Feb 24
Tourneys
300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
[I] TvZ Strategies and Builds [I] TvP Strategies and Build Roaring Currents ASL final Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1150 users

Part Four: Money

Blogs > ChristianS
Post a Reply
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3229 Posts
December 31 2011 05:18 GMT
#1
Any RTS game has a variety of resources, both in-game (army, bases, map control, tech) and out-of-game (APM, planned build order, knowledge of timings). Perhaps the most important resources, though (for which the term "resources" is usually used) are money resources. These resources are essential to structuring economies in any RTS, and the characteristics of those resources determine a great deal about the gameplay of that game.

The first, most obvious characteristic of money resources is how many there are. More resources create a more complex game; Halo Wars (one of the only successful console RTS games) has only a single resource, where Age of Empires has four. Halo Wars is perhaps the simplest RTS game you will ever play; Age of Empires is among the most complex. Many RTS games, however, prefer a two-resource system in which one is the primary resource (useful by itself, and required for everything) and the other is a secondary resource (only required for some things, and only usable in combination with the primary resource).

Details of those resources tell more about the game. Many resources are placed in base locations and harvested by workers, in which case an important number is the saturation level of that resource on one base. In Starcraft, the primary resource has a relatively high saturation level (24 workers in SC2), while the secondary has a relatively low saturation level (6 in SC2). WC3, by contrast, has a low saturation level for the primary resource (5 workers) and a high saturation level for the secondary resource (trees are everywhere in most maps). High saturation levels reward efficient worker production and economy-building; low saturation levels do not (unless taking additional expansions is very easy). Because WC3's primary resource has such a low saturation level and additional expansions are relatively difficult, the game is not especially economy-focused (lumber has a high saturation level, but lumber is only useful in combination with gold, so large lumber operations just lead to a smaller army and a huge bank of lumber). Starcraft 2, on the other hand, has a high saturation level on minerals, so constantly producing workers is a definite key to success, and economy is a large focus of the game.

Sometimes money resources are tied to other non-money resources in the game. In SC2, for instance, vespene gas is tied to higher tech plays. This causes the value of the resource to vary significantly depending on the play style the player is trying to use. Among other effects, this makes scouting much more effective in the game, thus reducing the problems associated with having a large number of units available in the game. Replaceable Parts would benefit significantly from such a system, since it is based on a premise that creates a large number of permutations in the way of possible play styles.

Resources can also have a barrier to harvesting at the beginning of the game. This could be placing them outside the main base of each player, or it could be requiring some building or other tech to harvest them (e.g. refinery). This delays that resource, thus delaying any gameplay aspects that might be tied to that resource. It also causes that resource to be more of an investment, which, like tying the resource to a gameplay aspect, aids scouting by allowing the opponent to see how much has been invested into obtaining that resource.

Finally, there are more experimental features that money resources can exhibit. What about resources that are gained based on possession of a map feature, rather than harvesting of a map feature? This presents problems like defining "possession," but it is can be solved effectively. In Disciples 2, for instance, special units (much like worker units) are not terribly useful for most purposes, but have the ability to place "rods" on the map that turn the terrain into friendly terrain (much like creep tumors in SC2). Once a resource is on friendly terrain, the player receives money from it each turn. Of course, Disciples 2 is turn-based strategy, rather than RTS, but a similar system could be instituted in real time where the resource produces x rate of income once it is in a player's possession. This type of resource encourages gameplay in which position is an especially important resource, since maintaining a resource is cheap, but obtaining it is expensive.

Many RTS's today have asymmetrical races. What about asymmetrical resources? That is to say, why not have the different races require different resources to function? This encourages a different type of gameplay in which seizing a resource is half as valuable: with identical resources for each side, obtaining a resource both allows you to use it and denies your opponent that opportunity. Now players can only obtain a useful resource for themselves or deny their opponents a resource; not both. This design presents problems, however; if these are resources harvested by workers, how can bases be designed to include the necessary resources for a given player? Including all relevant resources in a base defeats the purpose of differentiating the resources. Populating each player's side of the map with the appropriate resources similarly defeats this purpose; how often in SC2 do players attempt to steal bases from their opponent's side of the map anyway?

A better way to work out asymmetrical resources is to make them possession-based rather than harvesting-based resources like Disciples 2. Then they can be placed in parts of the map that are not clearly in possession of either player, and the player that can maintain that position is rewarded with possession of that resource. Or, if we still want to use the harvesting kind of resource, then different bases around the map must provide different resources, and be placed in positions that are not clearly associated with either player. This makes expansions harder to defend, thus punishing economic plays, but that can be off-set by designing expansions to be easier to defend or making them less of an investment to begin with.

So now let's add a resource system to the Replaceable Parts model created in Part Three. Resources function as such: there are four races, and each has a primary and secondary money resource. The primary resource for one race is the secondary resource for another race, and the other two races have no use for that resource. So with races 1, 2, 3, and 4, and resources A, B, C, and D, then race 1 uses A as a primary resource and b as a secondary (lowercase denoting secondary resource), race 2 uses B and c, race 3 uses C and d, and race 4 uses D and a. Starting bases possess all four resources, but all additional expansions possess only one resource, forcing players to choose what resource to focus on. Resources will be tied to different aspects of each race's strengths, much like vespene gas is tied to tech in SC2, but our model is not yet complex enough to determine to what aspect of gameplay each resource would be tied. All resources have a relatively high saturation level per base, rewarding players for playing economically and giving them greater freedom regarding the input of their economies.

This causes the strategy to vary significantly with match-up. In mirror match-ups, the resources will be shared, and the strategy will evolve like most RTS's today. in AvB, though, the players compete for resource 2 but resource 1 is only valuable to A, and resource 3 is only valuable to B. And in AvC, then all resources are entirely asymmetrical, so the only value to obtaining the opponent's resources is denying them to the opponent.

Further strategic implications of this resource system, as well as the unit customization model described in Part Three, will be discussed in future installments of this blog.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
14:30
October Qualifier #2
WardiTV1087
IndyStarCraft 246
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 246
LamboSC2 216
Codebar 37
sas.Sziky 14
UpATreeSC 1
MindelVK 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 42395
Calm 4915
Rain 2364
Jaedong 1587
Horang2 1318
Bisu 1006
EffOrt 574
Mini 541
Light 522
firebathero 494
[ Show more ]
Larva 487
Soma 426
Shuttle 393
ZerO 304
Stork 256
Snow 230
actioN 217
Free 157
Soulkey 124
Pusan 122
PianO 100
Rush 97
Hyun 96
Killer 76
ggaemo 74
sSak 64
sorry 37
Shine 34
Shinee 29
Terrorterran 22
Movie 21
Sacsri 16
scan(afreeca) 16
Bale 15
HiyA 14
Hm[arnc] 5
Noble 5
Mong 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6150
qojqva4120
Dendi1191
syndereN363
BananaSlamJamma296
Fuzer 241
canceldota53
Counter-Strike
byalli304
markeloff237
edward53
FunKaTv 36
fl0m1
Other Games
singsing2455
hiko803
FrodaN484
Lowko380
ceh9345
Sick191
Liquid`VortiX143
Hui .134
ArmadaUGS129
Skadoodle107
KnowMe74
QueenE64
Mew2King58
Trikslyr42
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL439
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Noizen33
League of Legends
• Jankos2789
• TFBlade948
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
7h 59m
Replay Cast
17h 59m
OSC
23h 59m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 6h
The PondCast
1d 17h
OSC
1d 19h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Online Event
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.