| Blogs > dapierow |
|
dapierow
Serbia1316 Posts
http://www.sc2replayed.com/replays/176063-1v1-zerg-backwater-gulch In Spoiler is a description of the game + Show Spoiler + I 14 pool, while opponent 6 pool all in's me... I manage to fend it off with one zerling left in the game... he proceedes to call me a hacker and blah blah... im happy just watching my one zergling chomp away at his hatchery then... I get a message saying a stalemate is detected... and game ends with his hatch having 2 hp...    | ||
|
Esel
Germany151 Posts
| ||
|
Existential
Australia2107 Posts
| ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
bt545
United Kingdom27 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
 | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
I have a similar story from beta (before stalemate existed) where I was on that shitty lava map they used to have playing a PvT we get into an elimination race he kills my nexus, I hide pylons and have a much larger army, I saw him rebuilding CC in my main and needed to go kill it, but he was running around wiping out all my pylons so I had to hold my ground, killed his entire army, but by the time I got to his CC because I had to wait he floated it away. I killed all his army and had map control, but no workers or money, he had a command center but couldn't do shit because I was camping every expo. We sat there for 5 minutes and talked, and I ended up just leaving. They have a lot of stupidly implemented things in sc2. The stalemate detection should take a LOT longer to kick in, or have better criterion. The revealing players with no nexcus/cc/hatch is just stupid. It's goal is to prevent pylon hiding homosexuality in games, but it actually just ruins elimination races and is just really annoying. | ||
|
Artifice
United States523 Posts
| ||
|
Backpack
United States1776 Posts
You couldnt kill any of his buildings in 5 minutes? | ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On August 23 2011 02:20 Backpack wrote: Dont you get a 5 minute warning? You couldnt kill any of his buildings in 5 minutes? He only had one zergling...it's gonna take a while to kill everything lol | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
|
moopie
12605 Posts
:/ | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
KazeHydra
Japan2788 Posts
On August 23 2011 02:54 krndandaman wrote: they should make it so that they have to first fulfill the requirement of having no attacking units before announcing stalemate for not mining for a while. that wouldn't work because if player 1 only has ground units and no mining ability and player 2 floats a building to the corner, it's still a stalemate. I like the idea of no damage being inflicted as an additional requirement to stalemate. | ||
|
whitelly
Czech Republic50 Posts
And at any rate,you won,so you rage just over some number in ladder? | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25980 Posts
| ||
|
Tegin
United States840 Posts
On August 23 2011 04:06 Chill wrote: Shouldn't one of the criteria be nothing is taking damage? Yes! If a building it under attack there obviously isn't a stalemate. Dunno why Blizzard implemented it this way. Sorry OP..that's brutal :/ | ||
|
CryMore
United States497 Posts
Stale Mate (From Liquipedia) Generate income, Produce a unit, Construct a building, Research an upgrade, or Destroy an enemy building. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25980 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
