On August 11 2011 21:39 Senx wrote: But this is the thing with the SC community, its constantly looking for flaws and hating on things instead of appreciating what we have or looking at the broader picture.
Luckily Tasteless, Day9 and Artosis have stopped reading these kind of TL threads or they'd probably commited suicide by now.
You guys need to take a step back and look at what you're actually complaining about.
But seriously though, HOW DARE tasteless and artosis be wrong in anything they say, I thought they were perfectly programmed robots. Flaws are for human beings, not for robots. This is pissing me off SOO much I have to go write a blog about it. Be right back.
Please, read the entirety post before making assumptions on what was said.
You're calling tasteless uninformed, that he calls things wrong and that he lacks passion.
You're calling artosis biased but that he has improved since switching to protoss.
If you have such a deep understanding of the game, why do you need them to tell you what's going on? I'm only in Diamond and I rarely mis-predict build orders or have trouble figuring out who is ahead, or going to win long before the casters say anything. Sounds like you have some personal issues with them and want to sound impartial.
You make some points that are good, and some that are bad.
All in all though all I have to say is you try to pick up a microphone and do better. Casting is notoriously easy to do in your head (when you don't actually have to talk to anyone) and notoriously hard to do when you have to actually speaking the words. Try to be perfectly accurate about a game while constantly talking and trying to maintain a logical flow of thought. It's pretty hard.
Seriously just listen to a recording of yourself casting or even just talking to someone, and you will feel self-conscious. Things sound a lot better in our heads than they come out.
Sure I agree, Tastosis get a lot of things wrong. At the bottom line they are fairly entertaining, energetic, and if you're a smart enough player (which you seem to be) you can fill in the gaps yourself. It certainly beats watching Brood War vods on Jon747 or Nevake while three people scream a language that you can't understand. (Not that I didn't love certain things about watching starcraft with Korean commentators, they have a charm of their own, but it can be nice to understand the commentary too).
Obviously analysis in hindsight is much easier to do. I don't expect from Artosis (the analysis portions of) this essay when I listen to him cast, not even five years from now. In fact, if you read my post more carefully, you'll see that I didn't actually take issue with him misreading Keen's build as an all in INITIALLY. It's the continued unwillingness to admit error, colored by bias, as well as mistakes reading basic tactics (Tasteless and Terran drops) that irk me.
Let's think of it this way. If your analysis is so fantastic, why do you even listen to them? I certainly don't listen to anyone's strategic analysis in TvX because I want to draw my own conclusions as the game progresses and see how right (or wrong) they are.
Tastosis for me is just entertainment. So I don't really care to criticize them. That's not to say there is no room for it, but I just am secure enough in my understanding of the game that I don't care about their analysis. And it's not like they're doing any harm by being wrong. Players who lose in everything from masters to bronze are not going to lose more because tastosis made the wrong call in analysis. They're going to keep losing because their macro/micro/refinement sucks.
"admittedly high" is a good starting point to realizing that your expectations are heinously unrealistic. Because seriously man, you are REALLY coming across as a basement dweller that doesn't have a friend to share his hobby with. If that's the case (and it's fine, by the way. I don't look down on people who have that problem, and rebutting it will serve no purpose) then I'd suggest looking around your uni and finding a group (or hell, starting one) that's into starcraft. You sound isolated to the degree that you can't EXPRESS your love for the game in any way except higher and higher demands of people you've never met.
I'd also suggest dicking around more in games and taking it less seriously. What league are you? I was mid-masters when I played standard, but now I'm platinum because I do things like build 66 ravens in a TvZ every game now. Play some 2v2's. Do some funday monday challenges. Your overtones about a GAME are far too serious. Taking anything that seriously is unhealthy. Same goes for my girlfriend's little sister, who makes olympic trial cuts in swimming. She is a jaded, one-dimensional person because of her unhealthy obsession with her passions.
This is pretty hilarious because
1) I belong to the USC Esports CSL Team and Club, and hang out weekly with them, joking about shit like how retarded casters are sometimes. 2) I was a masters Terran Seasons 1 and 2, and I did exactly as you suggested this season by dropping all the way to silver and winning games doing stupid shit like mass sentries to troll noobs. 3) You're here ranting about my criticisms of a public figure, something that everyone takes part in from time to time, while you obtain to try to do some retarded amateur psychoanalysis on me. I mean, who does that? Sounds like you're the weirdo with too much time on his hands trying to psychoanalyze random people on the Internet you disagree with.
Honestly, this in my opinion is the worst response to criticism. The fact that something is hard, or that perfection isn't attainable by humanity, isn't a legitimate response to suggesting that something could be made better.
The truth here, brotato, is that you aren't criticizing tastosis. You are ATTACKING and INSULTING them. There is something constructive to be gleaned from your OP, sure, but it's mired in the most antisocial nerd language that I've read in a long time. Constructive criticism is mixing good with bad. Things they're doing wrong, how they can do it better, why you feel it needs improvement. Not just nitpicking at caster mishaps, abjectly insulting one of them as a person, and doing nothing but saying all the crap you dislike about them and their casting style.
If you really dislike them that much, stop watching them. That's as strong a vote against them as anything else.
Oh boo hoo, my post had hostile language! Who could've expected such when it was a critical post? Tastosis have thousands of people to shower them with praise and tell them what they're doing right. They need people to be honest with them and tell them what they're doing wrong.
On August 11 2011 21:39 Senx wrote: But this is the thing with the SC community, its constantly looking for flaws and hating on things instead of appreciating what we have or looking at the broader picture.
Luckily Tasteless, Day9 and Artosis have stopped reading these kind of TL threads or they'd probably commited suicide by now.
You guys need to take a step back and look at what you're actually complaining about.
But seriously though, HOW DARE tasteless and artosis be wrong in anything they say, I thought they were perfectly programmed robots. Flaws are for human beings, not for robots. This is pissing me off SOO much I have to go write a blog about it. Be right back.
Please, read the entirety post before making assumptions on what was said.
You're calling tasteless uninformed, that he calls things wrong and that he lacks passion.
You're calling artosis biased but that he has improved since switching to protoss.
This was my response.
And I wrote this post with the intention to highlight ways that they could improve, and point out that they do mistakes, in order to try to improve their casting and dispel myths about it at the same time.
So today, Wolf has casted nearly 9 hours now, and he has an increased work load, while Tasteless casts every other Code S game, tell me Tasteless hasn't lost his passion.
Obviously analysis in hindsight is much easier to do. I don't expect from Artosis (the analysis portions of) this essay when I listen to him cast, not even five years from now. In fact, if you read my post more carefully, you'll see that I didn't actually take issue with him misreading Keen's build as an all in INITIALLY. It's the continued unwillingness to admit error, colored by bias, as well as mistakes reading basic tactics (Tasteless and Terran drops) that irk me.
Let's think of it this way. If your analysis is so fantastic, why do you even listen to them? I certainly don't listen to anyone's strategic analysis in TvX because I want to draw my own conclusions as the game progresses and see how right (or wrong) they are.
Tastosis for me is just entertainment. So I don't really care to criticize them. That's not to say there is no room for it, but I just am secure enough in my understanding of the game that I don't care about their analysis. And it's not like they're doing any harm by being wrong. Players who lose in everything from masters to bronze are not going to lose more because tastosis made the wrong call in analysis. They're going to keep losing because their macro/micro/refinement sucks.
Honestly, because I need to have the cast unmuted in order to hear game sounds. Sound is a huge part of both playing SC2, and people who throw around the "JUST MUTE THE CASTER'S IF YOU DON'T LIKE THEM" argument need to realize that there are other reasons to have sound on if there isn't a castless stream.
On August 11 2011 21:48 Kashll wrote: You make some points that are good, and some that are bad.
All in all though all I have to say is you try to pick up a microphone and do better. Casting is notoriously easy to do in your head (when you don't actually have to talk to anyone) and notoriously hard to do when you have to actually speaking the words. Try to be perfectly accurate about a game while constantly talking and trying to maintain a logical flow of thought. It's pretty hard.
Seriously just listen to a recording of yourself casting or even just talking to someone, and you will feel self-conscious. Things sound a lot better in our heads than they come out.
Sure I agree, Tastosis get a lot of things wrong. At the bottom line they are fairly entertaining, energetic, and if you're a smart enough player (which you seem to be) you can fill in the gaps yourself. It certainly beats watching Brood War vods on Jon747 or Nevake while three people scream a language that you can't understand. (Not that I didn't love certain things about watching starcraft with Korean commentators, they have a charm of their own, but it can be nice to understand the commentary too).
Yes, casting is hard to do. No, I'm not saying I can do better. This does not address the fact that the criticisms in my post are valid, and that Tastosis can improve.
The only problem I have with Tastosis is how they just worship some players. In Bomber vs Byun last month I was cheering for Bomber going into the match. Then after Bomber won 2 games Artosis was being so ridiculous saying Bomber is so far ahead of other Terrans that in the end I was hoping Bomber would lose.
On August 11 2011 21:51 Kraznaya wrote: This is pretty hilarious because
1) I belong to the USC Esports CSL Team and Club, and hang out weekly with them, joking about shit like how retarded casters are sometimes. 2) I was a masters Terran Seasons 1 and 2, and I did exactly as you suggested this season by dropping all the way to silver and winning games doing stupid shit like mass sentries to troll noobs.
IIRC, the CSL is still Brood war, is it not? or did they upgrade into SCII?
"trolling noobs" is a bad argument for you. You're really just drawing back in on the antisocial nature of your post that you're now being called out to defend. I'd wager a guess that you're particularly BM in your games, as well.
3) You're here ranting about my criticisms of a public figure, something that everyone takes part in from time to time, while you obtain to try to do some retarded amateur psychoanalysis on me. I mean, who does that? Sounds like you're the weirdo with too much time on his hands trying to psychoanalyze random people on the Internet you disagree with.
Keep talking, broceratops. All you're doing is just driving home my very standard psychoanalysis with defensive explanations. Did I mention that I'm in medical school? Psych profiles are part of my job. And you are fitting a very distinct mold more closely with every sentence you spit out.
Oh boo hoo, my post had hostile language! Who could've expected such when it was a critical post? Tastosis have thousands of people to shower them with praise and tell them what they're doing right. They need people to be honest with them and tell them what they're doing wrong.
Even more angry nerd language. Hostile language is different from insulting a person in a way that you have no insight on, no basis for even stating (have you SEEN him go out and party? I'd wager not.)
I never even said you should tell them what they're doing right. I said, very clearly, that you should tell them what they're doing wrong, how they can fix it, and why you think so (you don't even need to include the how to fix comment, though the harsher your language, the more necessary it is for not appearing like a retarded troll.) Calling someone a drunkard when it has no relevance to anything mentioned or inferred in starcraft is just fucked up. If you said my progamer friends were bad because they were drunkards who partied on their off days, I be sorely tempted to slap you.
It's called Tact. learn it, it's kind of important in life.
On August 11 2011 21:39 Senx wrote: But this is the thing with the SC community, its constantly looking for flaws and hating on things instead of appreciating what we have or looking at the broader picture.
Luckily Tasteless, Day9 and Artosis have stopped reading these kind of TL threads or they'd probably commited suicide by now.
You guys need to take a step back and look at what you're actually complaining about.
But seriously though, HOW DARE tasteless and artosis be wrong in anything they say, I thought they were perfectly programmed robots. Flaws are for human beings, not for robots. This is pissing me off SOO much I have to go write a blog about it. Be right back.
Please, read the entirety post before making assumptions on what was said.
You're calling tasteless uninformed, that he calls things wrong and that he lacks passion.
You're calling artosis biased but that he has improved since switching to protoss.
This was my response.
And I wrote this post with the intention to highlight ways that they could improve, and point out that they do mistakes, in order to try to improve their casting and dispel myths about it at the same time.
To me everything you said in the OP is pretty blatantly obvious :p. Criticisms to things like Tasteless not adding much content and randomly saying inane things and Artosis bias have existed since the beginning. It's really nothing groundbreaking you are bringing up here.
There will always be blind fanboys for everything. If you followed BW before, you know that there are fanboys for Flash, Bisu, and Jaedong and they are all irrationally supportive of their respective players as well as borderline delusional at times. If someone becomes popular, that's just what happens, they get blind fanboys. There's no reason to conclude that because those fanboys exist that most people think Tasteless is a strategical genius and Artosis is the pinnacle of unbiased commentary.
Really I'm sure no one read this and thought "wow, I've never thought about it like that before". That's why you are getting people attacking you for nitpicking because what you've pointed out just seems like pointless criticism that is already well known and accepted as part of their charm as a commentary duo.
So basically you typed 14 paragraphs to say you get annoyed easily by irrelevant things, and when you can't hear your game sounds you get really mad. Ha.
On August 11 2011 21:51 Kraznaya wrote: This is pretty hilarious because
1) I belong to the USC Esports CSL Team and Club, and hang out weekly with them, joking about shit like how retarded casters are sometimes. 2) I was a masters Terran Seasons 1 and 2, and I did exactly as you suggested this season by dropping all the way to silver and winning games doing stupid shit like mass sentries to troll noobs.
IIRC, the CSL is still Brood war, is it not? or did they upgrade into SCII?
They downgraded to SC2.
"trolling noobs" is a bad argument for you. You're really just drawing back in on the antisocial nature of your post that you're now being called out to defend. I'd wager a guess that you're particularly BM in your games, as well.
Wow, I used Internet-y language to describe something I did in an Internet game? How antisocial! I must have deep seated emotional problems because of how I behave in an online video game!
3) You're here ranting about my criticisms of a public figure, something that everyone takes part in from time to time, while you obtain to try to do some retarded amateur psychoanalysis on me. I mean, who does that? Sounds like you're the weirdo with too much time on his hands trying to psychoanalyze random people on the Internet you disagree with.
Keep talking, broceratops. All you're doing is just driving home my very standard psychoanalysis with defensive explanations. Did I mention that I'm in medical school? Psych profiles are part of my job. And you are fitting a very distinct mold more closely with every sentence you spit out.
[/quote]
Ooh, congrats on your medical school. Keep psychoanalyzing on the Internet, bub. Everyone knows that Internet credentials are the best to have for pointless Internet psychoanalyzing.
I never even said you should tell them what they're doing right. I said, very clearly, that you should tell them what they're doing wrong, how they can fix it, and why you think so (you don't even need to include the how to fix comment, though the harsher your language, the more necessary it is for not appearing like a retarded troll.)
Lemme see -> "mix good with bad"
Hmm...
It's called Tact. learn it, it's kind of important in life.
Tact and respect are reserved for people who have earned it. And you clearly haven't, no matter how many Internet credentials you conjure up.