| Blogs > SpartiK1S |
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On October 07 2010 09:28 SpartiK1S wrote: this just isn't a fun game. NORMATIVE STATEMENTSSSSSS from the way you described your knowledge of the game I can safely say you are actually bad and have plenty of room to grow if you wish to come back. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
| ||
|
grats
United States184 Posts
| ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On October 07 2010 12:22 Scarecrow wrote: So you've played about 15 1v1 RTS games ever and then you make a blanket statement saying there is hardly any strategy in SC2? On October 07 2010 09:28 SpartiK1S wrote: Maybe one in 15 games do I find its a real strategic battle He said that 1 in 15 games comes down to strategy, not that he'd only played 15 games ever of sc2 or 15 rts titles. It's not clear which you're suggesting. | ||
|
Shauni
4077 Posts
On October 07 2010 12:22 Scarecrow wrote: So you've played about 15 1v1 RTS games ever and then you make a blanket statement saying there is hardly any strategy in SC2? It doesn't matter how much BW you watched (last semester lol) you're understanding of in-game strategy will be very shallow/simplistic and alot of the time you won't be able to see how you lost and blame it on something vague like 'build orders' or '1 basing'. There is so much depth in this game and its predecessor, the more you play the more it will reward you as you see the game in a new light and start on the long road to what Flash calls 'enlightenment'. how can you be so sure when no one has reached this so called 'enlightenment' for sc2? | ||
|
Whitesheep
United States59 Posts
exactly what NTT stated, and he got 9 page flamewar. such bullshit. seriously? Even bw becomes stale. it's less than challenging, and more of disciplining trivial shit. even great bw players with excellent strategic reasoning don't even feel like gaming anymore due to the discipline that's involved. 4-8 months out of gaming you could go from a A+ gamer to losing to C/C+ gamers. edit: it just isn't worth spending countless hours disciplining your game strategy that could be diminished due to 4-5 month inactivity, seriously. | ||
|
Lurgee
Australia252 Posts
On October 07 2010 13:37 Whitesheep wrote: 4-8 months out of gaming you could go from a A+ gamer to losing to C/C+ gamers. haha this is so wrong. Idra beat gorush after about a month not playing, he clearly retained much of his skill. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On October 07 2010 13:44 Lurgee wrote: haha this is so wrong. Idra beat gorush after about a month not playing, he clearly retained much of his skill. GoRush is on ace and as such practices much, much less than most progamers. | ||
|
Laerties
United States361 Posts
| ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On October 07 2010 13:37 Whitesheep wrote: holy shit. exactly what NTT stated, and he got 9 page flamewar. such bullshit. seriously? Even bw becomes stale. it's less than challenging, and more of disciplining trivial shit. even great bw players with excellent strategic reasoning don't even feel like gaming anymore due to the discipline that's involved. 4-8 months out of gaming you could go from a A+ gamer to losing to C/C+ gamers. edit: it just isn't worth spending countless hours disciplining your game strategy that could be diminished due to 4-5 month inactivity, seriously. nony beat idra after only training for a month after being gone for over a year (maybe longer, i cant remember) Starcraft is like any other sport. you dont do it for a while you get rusty. same with running, football, swimming, etc. | ||
|
KrAzYfoOL
Australia3037 Posts
| ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
| ||
|
MagnusHyperion
United States288 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
|
EPT
