EPT
Raise Zergs Supply Cap
| Blogs > KeKeZergRush |
|
KeKeZergRush
United States116 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
| ||
|
Tazza
Korea (South)1678 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:30 Chill wrote: I love these threads. Instead of playing, better people just argue that the game should be changed. Fantastic. Chill may have a point here... | ||
|
Thoreezhea1
United States532 Posts
 just saying.... | ||
|
shindigs
United States4795 Posts
| ||
|
Noe
Sweden80 Posts
| ||
tofucake
Hyrule19228 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:29 KeKeZergRush wrote: they can mass up some [...] hellions to kill the broodlords easily best part | ||
|
Horrde
Canada302 Posts
| ||
|
SubtleArt
2710 Posts
| ||
|
Krohm
Canada1857 Posts
| ||
|
Housemd
United States1407 Posts
| ||
|
Kolvacs
Canada1203 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:30 Chill wrote: I love these threads. Instead of playing, better people just argue that the game should be changed. Fantastic. Chill once again wins. | ||
|
green.at
Austria1459 Posts
On September 04 2010 05:18 Housemd wrote: i wish i could kill broodlords with hellions. gotta load them into medivacs together with a viking in assault mode. alternatively you could just build some marauders against broodlords (cause they do extra dmg against armored) | ||
|
TadH
Canada1846 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:30 Chill wrote: I love these threads. Instead of playing better, people just argue that the game should be changed. Fantastic. Rather then giving a valid argument why this is a bad idea just flame the guy, nice one.Way to set an example for quality posts. Anyway, Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you, where is the ;logic in that? | ||
|
TaiYang
Canada128 Posts
Fuck those hellions, killin my air... | ||
|
ShaperofDreams
Canada2492 Posts
| ||
|
s[O]rry
Canada398 Posts
| ||
|
selboN
United States2523 Posts
On September 04 2010 05:28 TadH wrote: Rather then giving a valid argument why this is a bad idea just flame the guy, nice one.Way to set an example for quality posts. Anyway, Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you, where is the ;logic in that? So is this an example of "quality" posting? Only difference I see between Chill's post and your own is that you tried to hide your post under false pretenses. + Show Spoiler + If that isn't clear, On September 04 2010 05:28 TadH wrote:Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you is not a valid counter-argument, just a sad attempt at one. | ||
|
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
| ||
|
TadH
Canada1846 Posts
On September 04 2010 06:05 selboN wrote: So is this an example of "quality" posting? Only difference I see between Chill's post and your own is that you tried to hide your post under false pretenses. + Show Spoiler + If that isn't clear, On September 04 2010 05:28 TadH wrote:Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you is not a valid counter-argument, just a sad attempt at one.I did not say ,mine was like uber quality, but at least I TRIED to give a valid reason why it's a bad idea.Go brown nose somewhere else. | ||
|
Hypnosis
United States2061 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:30 Chill wrote: I love these threads. Instead of playing better, people just argue that the game should be changed. Fantastic. I havent been around lately but it is my guess that a TON of newbs are flooding the forums with bullshit haha most games you NEVER max out wtf OP | ||
|
GreatFall
United States1061 Posts
| ||
|
Sephy90
United States1785 Posts
On September 04 2010 06:10 Hypnosis wrote: I havent been around lately but it is my guess that a TON of newbs are flooding the forums with bullshit haha most games you NEVER max out wtf OP Yeah... I read the battle.net forums and some guy basically said, "nerf hydras they killed me because he rushed to them. I don't remember which race he was but you can't rush hydras lol, the time and money it takes to get hydras, the other race should have more than enough to defend against a hydra push. I was just disappointed lol | ||
|
petered
United States1817 Posts
| ||
|
MacroNcheesE
United States508 Posts
| ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
On September 04 2010 05:28 TadH wrote: Rather then giving a valid argument why this is a bad idea just flame the guy, nice one.Way to set an example for quality posts. Anyway, Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you, where is the ;logic in that? I actually totally agree with you, Chill is such an ass sometimes.  | ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
priceless thread haha, those would be imba, tho i'm pretty sure Z have nightmares about that | ||
|
Sephy90
United States1785 Posts
On September 04 2010 06:32 Ian Ian Ian wrote: I actually totally agree with you, Chill is such an ass sometimes. You can't blame him with some of these ridiculous threads/posts that have been going around lately. | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
| ||
|
zobz
Canada2175 Posts
On September 04 2010 06:32 Ian Ian Ian wrote: That's bullshit imo. The only problem with tl admins is that they've turned into a bunch of pussies who are hesitant to hand out 1 week temp bans, despite that the forums are flooded with an influx of idiots who play sc2 and used to post exclusively on the b.net forums. There's no reason to show any more patience than chill has shown. Despite being a blog, that being his only saving grace, the OP is clearly choosing to suggest balance fixes rather than even Ask how he played wrong, yet from his own post it would seem that he maxed out on mutalisks before morphing any broodlords, and very likely has a problem with overagression against turtling players.I actually totally agree with you, Chill is such an ass sometimes. Edit: btw it's funny that hellions can kill broodlords | ||
|
Coindrop
United States203 Posts
| ||
|
Maynarde
Australia1286 Posts
| ||
|
aliasds
Canada555 Posts
| ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
On October 27 2010 19:02 aliasds wrote: Or instead of raising the supply cap, Zerg should be able to shift the time-space continuum and make everything cost half their original supply. Obviously to balance this supply reduction, unit sizes should also be halved. Yes, I agree. The upgrade could be a time machine acquired from the Xel-naga just so it fits in with the lore and make sense. lol, i would like to see mini ultralisks to the OP, it is frustrating to play against a turtling terran, but really, the terran is giving you the whole map and you can simplymake a ton of money and save up a bunch of money to bounce back when you lose in a 200 vs 200 battle. You can also build spine crawlers and cancel them after you make units and then cancel the crawlers and you'll be able to have over 200 supply  And steppes of war is the worst map. dont even play it | ||
|
Shana
Indonesia1814 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On September 04 2010 05:28 TadH wrote: Rather then giving a valid argument why this is a bad idea just flame the guy, nice one.Way to set an example for quality posts. Anyway, Raising the Zerg's supply cap is basically out of the question, it just sint fair, it's like fighting someone that will always have more guys then you, where is the ;logic in that? Actually, he in fact DID give a valid argument. I wouldn't doubt chill's expertise. | ||
|
Happy.fairytail
United States327 Posts
| ||
|
Durak
Canada3685 Posts
On September 04 2010 06:48 Sephy69 wrote: You can't blame him with some of these ridiculous threads/posts that have been going around lately. Lately? There have always been posts like this. As a result, Chill has been posting this way for the past four years. I'd find you some quotes but I'm sure you can search yourself. | ||
|
Ipp
United States456 Posts
Oh there are also upgrades to get cracklings are very good. | ||
|
pyaar
United States423 Posts
thors and hellions kill broodlords ? | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
I am giving op the benefit of the doubt and saying that he likely meant hellions to kill the broodlings. That seems to make sense. :D | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On September 04 2010 04:56 shindigs wrote: IF I CAN'T WIN THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE GAME This is what most people are like. So blunt and so true | ||
|
maga33
United States247 Posts
| ||
|
Stealthpenguin
Finland393 Posts
Maybe the hellions ride on the thors' shoulders and shoot from there. | ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
Emperor_Earth
United States824 Posts
On October 28 2010 05:29 Chairman Ray wrote: try using corrupters to counter the thors. Thors are massive so corrupters get the damage bonus against them. As for the hellions, I counter them with infesters. What you do is neural parasite one of them, run it to a safe place, and then fungal growth it. Keep picking off hellions one by one and then there will be no hellions left. 0.o Clearly you're bad. Use Neural parasites to grab a medivac to lift the hellion/thor/command center and drop it off the cliff's edge. So much cooler. | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
| ||
| ||
