EPTI do not like Sc2. - Page 3
| Blogs > IskatuMesk |
|
Shade692003
Canada702 Posts
| ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
| ||
|
Ideas
United States8174 Posts
| ||
|
IskatuMesk
Canada969 Posts
On May 03 2010 05:46 Shade692003 wrote: Titan's Quest's sequel? Ironlore shut downed not very long after TQ no? They reformed and have another game coming out in the future that is supposedly very similar to TQ. I forget what it was called. | ||
|
Censured
Czech Republic1061 Posts
| ||
|
da_head
Canada3350 Posts
| ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13081 Posts
Alright on to reading now. | ||
|
EchOne
United States2906 Posts
Hopefully you find a more robust modding community. Perhaps excellent 3rd-party tools will be developed for SC2. If I were you I'd finish the novel, though. Theoretically the writer has absolute control over his manuscript, especially if you have no intention to publish (as I seem to recall was the case.) | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
|
Olorin.SVK
Slovakia136 Posts
Edit: Also, I dont think that SC2 is terrible, but I definetly think is not as good as it could be. But hey, we are getting 2 datadiscs in the future... | ||
|
IskatuMesk
Canada969 Posts
On May 03 2010 05:57 EchOne wrote: If I were you I'd finish the novel, though. Theoretically the writer has absolute control over his manuscript, especially if you have no intention to publish (as I seem to recall was the case.) If I could focus on writing I wouldn't be worried about modding.  | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
"The reluctance of change. Browder is a great man at PR but I've yet to see any indication of him being any good at game design. Although he boasts the willingness to add and remove units at a whim, we get answers like this - Q: With the large discussion on Zerg changes, is there any planned? Or do you believe that they're not being used fully? A: We are looking at changes to the Corruptor. We are looking at the balance on Ultralisk and Infestor. We are not planning to introduce new units at this time, though we shall see as Beta progresses. =) While this is indeed a beta, as I well know, it seems to me that Blizzard from the start has been unwilling to make change where change is necessary. They have insisted to keep the Mothership in the game from the very beginning - doing absolutely everything in their power to keep this unit in multiplayer where it does not belong. This tells me that Blizzard is, in fact, unwilling to make change." Pretty much QFT. Browder talks the talk, but never have I ever seen him willing to do as he says. Easiest example is not removing the mothership, and the hard counter system. IT's a command and conquer counter system, not a starcraft 2 counter system  | ||
|
HaruHaru
United States988 Posts
| ||
|
WGT-Baal
France3521 Posts
thank you for a nice post, very well written and presented, and that gives a very interesting insight of a part of a community that isnt very known. But as a modder you bring up points that would have remained hidden to most players (including myself). I read it all and I hope Blizzard will do the same. | ||
|
jonnyp
United States415 Posts
5/5 | ||
|
AngryAsian
Canada68 Posts
| ||
|
ilj.psa
Peru3081 Posts
On May 03 2010 06:22 AngryAsian wrote: i get so sick and tired of sc2, it has almost NOTHING good compared to sc1. sc1 is just so perfect, making sc2 was a business move rather trying to make the game better. nothing will get better with 3d engine. 2d fighter is still the best, 2d rts will always be the best. completely agreed | ||
|
eMbrace
United States1300 Posts
and now I have not touched my beta in almost 2 months. i don't even know why either.. i'm afraid to admit that i may not be enjoying the game, and now the thought of saving hundreds on not buying this trilogy is very tempting to me. maybe if i switch races it will be better. more on topic: those VA vids were really cool, and i'd have to agree that the SC2 units lack a lot of personality. | ||
| ||
