EPTYou Are All Wrong - Page 2
| Blogs > cgrinker |
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
| ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
Same as i never write "Zerg == aliens", but i do "Zerg = aliens" since its mathematical way of writing. Plus =/= is understood by every1, but != only by ppl who had some contact with programming, try writing this to "casual" people (who don't know anything about programming) - they won't understand. </end post> (Oh crap...) | ||
|
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
That's why =/= is okay. Because some people are just stupid.  | ||
|
Dasher
United States71 Posts
| ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On October 22 2009 03:25 Kaniol wrote: OMG programmers... != is programming habit, =/= is mathematic habit. Sorry i study maths, not I.T. and thus i will keep writing =/=. Same as i never write "Zerg == aliens", but i do "Zerg = aliens" since its mathematical way of writing. Plus =/= is understood by every1, but != only by ppl who had some contact with programming, try writing this to "casual" people (who don't know anything about programming) - they won't understand. </end post> (Oh crap...) In that case you should be doing ≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠ not =/= | ||
|
Adeny
Norway1233 Posts
On October 22 2009 03:57 Dasher wrote: would know what it =ed. This sentence would mean if "it" can be set to "ed", clearly you must mean ==ed. | ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
So from now on I'll be using this: =\= | ||
|
iSiN
United States1075 Posts
On October 22 2009 03:25 Kaniol wrote: OMG programmers... != is programming habit, =/= is mathematic habit. Sorry i study maths, not I.T. and thus i will keep writing =/=. Same as i never write "Zerg == aliens", but i do "Zerg = aliens" since its mathematical way of writing. Plus =/= is understood by every1, but != only by ppl who had some contact with programming, try writing this to "casual" people (who don't know anything about programming) - they won't understand. </end post> (Oh crap...) Good programming languages use = to test equality and := for assignment imo However the vast majority of them (including all the ones I use frequently) use the stupid ==  | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21244 Posts
| ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
"Being a member of TL does NOT make you a good SC player." | ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
On October 22 2009 02:20 Hittegods wrote: What's wrong with ≠? There is no alt # for it outside of Microsoft Word. | ||
|
Wohmfg
United Kingdom1292 Posts
| ||
|
Symmetry
Canada294 Posts
| ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On October 22 2009 02:17 JeeJee wrote: why don't you use <> while you're at it too pfft fuck yes~ | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
~= okay? | ||
|
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
On October 22 2009 05:04 iSiN wrote: Good programming languages use = to test equality and := for assignment imo However the vast majority of them (including all the ones I use frequently) use the stupid == Don't diss C++. | ||
|
seppolevne
Canada1681 Posts
On October 22 2009 05:55 freelander wrote: I prefer Lua ~= okay? I learned it that way as well, but I always read it as "sorta equals" because I'm so used to using the "~" as "around, approx". | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
On October 22 2009 07:03 seppolevne wrote: I learned it that way as well, but I always read it as "sorta equals" because I'm so used to using the "~" as "around, approx". I started with cpp though | ||
|
b3h47pte
United States1317 Posts
On October 22 2009 05:04 iSiN wrote: Good programming languages use = to test equality and := for assignment imo However the vast majority of them (including all the ones I use frequently) use the stupid == in my opinion Good programming languages uses == to test equality and = for assignment imo. However a certain few (*coughcough*delphi*cough*) use the stupid = and := | ||
| ||
