EPT![[image loading]](http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs232.snc1/7927_149630043718_519008718_2599045_2775628_n.jpg)
Pretty simple, easy on the eyes for people to be able to see it well. The camera sucks 'cause it was off my phone. I'm going to go back today with a better camera to take a picture of it. I will be doing more soon just for her!
Tribute to my Mom
| Blogs > ShoCkeyy |
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
Pretty simple, easy on the eyes for people to be able to see it well. The camera sucks 'cause it was off my phone. I'm going to go back today with a better camera to take a picture of it. I will be doing more soon just for her! | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On the one hand I am absolutely sorry for your loss. On the other you chose to vandalize someone else in her memory  | ||
|
StalkerSC
Canada378 Posts
On October 12 2009 01:32 {88}iNcontroL wrote: I will be watching this blog closely.. On the one hand I am absolutely sorry for your loss. On the other you chose to vandalize someone else in her memory ^Well said.. | ||
|
chongu
Malaysia2585 Posts
| ||
|
plated.rawr
Norway1676 Posts
On the other you chose to vandalize someone else in her memory This isn't vandalizing, only street art versus conservative art. Nothing new here. Nice tribute, I'm sure she'd appreciate the work put in to this. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 12 2009 01:49 plated.rawr wrote: This isn't vandalizing, only street art versus conservative art. Nothing new here. Nice tribute, I'm sure she'd appreciate the work put in to this. Is it someone elses property? Did they unknowingly have it altered or defaced? Calling it street art hardly changes these things.. | ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
I'm sorry for your loss. | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On October 12 2009 01:49 plated.rawr wrote: This isn't vandalizing, only street art versus conservative art. Nothing new here. Nice tribute, I'm sure she'd appreciate the work put in to this. did he get permission to paint on someone's wall? No? Then its vandalizing isnt it. But hey, at least its better than wearing excessive eyeliner and beating up homeless people. | ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
sorry for your loss | ||
|
SanguineToss
Canada815 Posts
| ||
|
plated.rawr
Norway1676 Posts
did he get permission to paint on someone's wall? No? Then its vandalizing isnt it. Did he do it on a public building? Are public buildings owned by the government? Is the government not funded, elected and consisting of the people? Is a public building not public property, owned by the people? Also, vandalizing signifies he destroyed or damaged the wall. Did a cover of art destroy that blank grey wall in any way? Are the "damages" caused irreversible? If it was on a private building, then shame on him obviously. | ||
|
SanguineToss
Canada815 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 12 2009 02:03 plated.rawr wrote: Did he do it on a public building? Are public buildings owned by the government? Is the government not funded, elected and consisting of the people? Also, vandalizing signifies he destroyed or damaged the wall. Did a cover of art destroy that blank grey wall in any way? Are the "damages" caused irreversible? If it was on a private building, then shame on him obviously. Oh so everything that is public property or government owned is our individual right to change alter or do whatever we like, right? You honestly think the world works that way? What about the other 300 million people who "own" that piece of property? Did they get a say? What about those 300 million (or just the state of florida) that has to pay MORE money to return that piece of property to its original, intended, non defaced state? Do you think they mind that someone is vandalizing it? I'm sorry but "vandalizing" only "signifies" exactly what I said. We both are on the internet obviously so we can both check the definition. | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
Rice
United States1332 Posts
| ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On October 12 2009 02:03 plated.rawr wrote: Did he do it on a public building? Are public buildings owned by the government? Is the government not funded, elected and consisting of the people? Is a public building not public property, owned by the people? Also, vandalizing signifies he destroyed or damaged the wall. Did a cover of art destroy that blank grey wall in any way? Are the "damages" caused irreversible? If it was on a private building, then shame on him obviously. sure, get the entire public to agree it should be painted and I'll agree with you. I mean why not steal government cars at the same time! I mean its yours anyway right? shockey: sorry for your mom | ||
|
RedArmor
United States13 Posts
| ||
|
SanguineToss
Canada815 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
Miamigraffiti.com <-- go there and look up catalyst and you'll see. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
| ||
| ||
