Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 32
Forum Index > Website Feedback |
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
Tidus Mino
United Kingdom1108 Posts
| ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
Tidus Mino
United Kingdom1108 Posts
On April 09 2012 00:15 salle wrote: Im quite sure they are, did you look thurougly enough? I looked for every abbreviation of Copenhagen games, CPG, CPH, CG etc and nothing worked so I assume it isn't | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Copenhagen_Games_Spring_2012 http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Gamers_Assembly_2012 | ||
Tidus Mino
United Kingdom1108 Posts
On April 09 2012 09:56 salle wrote: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/The_Gathering_2012 http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Copenhagen_Games_Spring_2012 http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Gamers_Assembly_2012 ah i'm sorry, I should have been more clear, I meant listing players accomplishments on teams liquipedia's, listing their best result of the year example - http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Team_Dignitas | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [Long answer] + On liquipedia we have divided tournaments into some arbitrary groupings to be able to set up some guidelines for each category, instead of each tournament. two of these groups are Premiere and Major tournaments. Premiere are tournaments like MLG Championships, DreamHack Winter, GSL etc, big tournaments with top players from all three major regions, big price pools, big production, big viewership. In contrast the Major tournaments are still pretty big, but just not as big. Perhaps not as high quality in the player base, not as big price pool, not as good production, not as big number of viewers. Like take the tournaments this weekend they were all pretty big, but IPL4 clearly had more viewers, bigger production, a better playerpool, more price money etc than the gathering and copenhagen games. Now when we do lists like the best result in a year on a team page we thought it best to limit ourselves to the Premiere tournaments or we'd end up with hundreds rather than tens of different abbreviations and icons and links. Perhaps we're overly cautius and give contributors and readers too little credit for the amount of different tournament we can list. But for me at least at the moment it seems like the right choice. | ||
-Baloo-
United States15 Posts
| ||
iMAniaC
Norway703 Posts
" {{player-stub}} Player has been playing on and off in silver league for the last year. " And then never any chance of the page being edited ever again. However, if you've actually done something that's worthy of being mentioned, then there's a good chance you'll be allowed to have a page. Thus, my advice to you is to write your page, as completely as possible, in some of your user pages (just type in "User:-DirtyMonkey-" or "User:-DirtyMonkey-/sandbox" and keep building the page there. Then, when you've filled it with info of what tournaments you've been in, how you've placed, your team history etc. etc., only then do you create the actual page. Alternately, if you haven't achieved anything yet, you can have whatever you like on your userpage (i.e. "User:-DirtyMonkey-"), so you can have your page there until you actually achieve something. Also, feel free to chronicle your way to the stars, as it were, with all the tournaments you have participated in, but haven't won. It'll be interesting trivia the day you win MLG | ||
svalestup
5 Posts
I just wanted to say that I love Liquipedia and use it all the time, but that the search engine can be improved upon. For example, when I search "NASL season 3", I don't get any relevant results. The reason probably being that there is no page named that, it is named "North American Star League Season 3". It would be cool if you could implement maybe alternative page names that could be used for search lookups, or perhaps just make more equivalent names refer to the same page, like how "NASL" redirects you to "North American Star League". | ||
NSnaKe
Spain18 Posts
| ||
NSnaKe
Spain18 Posts
| ||
NSnaKe
Spain18 Posts
| ||
Tryxtira
Sweden572 Posts
Love you guys! | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On your second question. No you don't need to ask anyone for permission to help out with Liquipedia, it's open to everyone who wants to contribute. | ||
Tryxtira
Sweden572 Posts
| ||
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On this page: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Help:Flagged_Revisions#Terminology the level one reviewed level for accuracy is listed as "Sighted". I see that it's listed like this all over Liquipedia. So this is the merriam-webster definition of "sighted": sight·ed adj \ˈsī-təd\ : having sight <clear-sighted> <a sighted person> The LP page doesn't have any definitions of what each level means exactly, but I think the word you all are looking for is Cited maybe? cite verb \ˈsīt\ cit·edcit·ing Definition of CITE transitive verb 1: to call upon officially or authoritatively to appear (as before a court) 2: to quote by way of example, authority, or proof <cites several noteworthy authors> 3a : to refer to; especially : to mention formally in commendation or praise b : to name in a citation 4: to bring forward or call to another's attention especially as an example, proof, or precedent <cited the weather as a reason for canceling the picnic> So that might possibly be something that needs a change....? | ||
ChapatiyaqPTSM
France1887 Posts
From http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Flagged_Revisions: Sighted means that an article has been looked at and does not contain vandalism. Also, as an editor on LP, when I review a page, my only two possible choices for Accuracy are
"Accurate" and "Well sourced" may only be available for admins, or even not available to anyone on LP. There is a similar discussion on MediaWiki (the PHP source of Liquipedia, and many wikis), but it doesn't help much: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help_talk:Extension:FlaggedRevs#the_term_.22sighted.22_is_obscure_and_misleading | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
13. to see, glimpse, notice, or observe: to sight a ship to the north. 14. to take a sight or observation of (a stake, coastline, etc.), especially with surveying or navigating instruments. | ||
| ||