Looks awesome, thanks :D Yeah we will probably be able to take a look at the vods or so, I know some
daisuki 2-1 ogsthestc
daisuki 2-0 suppy
daisuki 3-1 tails
suppy 2-0 potiguar
potiguar 1-2 tails
suppy 2-0 kawhao

also daisuki is on vVv and personally sponsored by nitrix as well so dunno what to put for there

Noam

Israel2209 Posts

June 02 2012 23:30 GMT

#666

On June 03 2012 08:11 Superiorwolf wrote:
also daisuki is on vVv and personally sponsored by nitrix as well so dunno what to put for there

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/index.php?title=Daisuki&action=historysubmit&diff=270398&oldid=255941 not on vVv anymore apparently.

Superiorwolf

United States5509 Posts

June 02 2012 23:34 GMT

#667

On June 03 2012 08:30 Noam wrote:

Show nested quote +

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/index.php?title=Daisuki&action=historysubmit&diff=270398&oldid=255941 not on vVv anymore apparently.

Hmm maybe not, yesterday vVvGlon told me that Daisuki was still part of vVv but I'm not sure

JBright

Vancouver14381 Posts

June 03 2012 02:44 GMT

#668

On June 03 2012 08:34 Superiorwolf wrote:

Show nested quote +

Hmm maybe not, yesterday vVvGlon told me that Daisuki was still part of vVv but I'm not sure

Maybe he's not part of the competitive team and just in their community team.

lord_nibbler

Germany591 Posts

June 05 2012 18:12 GMT

#669

There is a funny bug over a couple of pages:
The "Copenhagen Wolves" are somehow part of Taiwan. (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Portal:Teams/Asia_and_Oceania )
They are even in the TESL. (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Taiwan_eSports_League/2011/Season_2 )
My guess is the Wayi Spiders get wrongly replaced by the Wolves.

salle

Sweden5554 Posts

June 05 2012 19:16 GMT

#670

Yeah, thanks for finding that. It's fixed now. Might take a while before all the pages it was wrongly displayed on are updated to the correct icons.

jalstar

United States8198 Posts

June 06 2012 06:33 GMT

#671

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/index.php?title=KT_Rolster&stable=0&shownotice=1&fromsection=Proleague_Performance

If I get around to doing something like that for SC2 now that team leagues are picking up, should I just add it to the page with all the other tables?

SpidereOMarU

Korea (South)8 Posts

June 09 2012 08:17 GMT

#672

hi I am Spider team manager (I am TL chobo.. so write in here too)
The reason why I write this is because our team liquidpedialink have some problems.
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Wayi_SpiderWayi Spider
This is our liquidpedia link, and I have updated some informations.
But, my updates are not shown when I dont log in page, and this message occurs;
"The stable version was checked on 15 May 2012. There are 56 pending changes awaiting review."
We are really hoping U guys to check in our updates, and thank you to see this.
ps.liquidpedia "Spider Korea" is made from team, and even they are same team, backgrounds and environments are different. please dont delete that.

salle

Sweden5554 Posts

June 09 2012 08:23 GMT

#673

Hi, the reviewing process takes some time, I think there's at least one person reviewing your page right now. Not sure how long it will take though.

SpidereOMarU

Korea (South)8 Posts

June 11 2012 08:42 GMT

#674

I added "Wayi Spider"'s picture in our team.
Please feedback this

SpidereOMarU

Korea (South)8 Posts

June 11 2012 08:49 GMT

#675

hi, I am Spider Korea manager

I added our team "Spider Korea"'s page and intro in Team>Korea page~
please check and take my feedback!!

ChapatiyaqPTSM

France1887 Posts

June 11 2012 10:38 GMT

#676

I am gonna review your work.

But next time, please don't post here to request feedback for every edit you make. This is also unnecessary.
Unreviewed edits are shown to editors on this page: (Wiki)

Special:RecentChanges, so we will review it eventually. It can take some time because reviewing need some fact-checking. So please be patient!

In the case of "Spider Korea" or "Wayi Spider", we can only trust the fact that you are the manager of the team to validate your edits :
The website http://www.wayispider.com is out-of-date, and your Facebook page is not an easy way to find information about your team. Please update those pages as well.

Thanks!

TaLuS

Germany17 Posts

June 12 2012 13:58 GMT

#677

Hey guys,
I find it very hard to understand the "Attack" stats on units with multiple weapons. I'm no noob, I know these numbers almost by heart, but I can imagine that newbies have a hard time understandig these on the fly. Fortunately I know a Wiki which has more clearly represented weapon stats. I'm talking about http://sc2pod.com/wiki/Main_Page. It's not updated anymore (because I stopped updating it because Liquipedia had more potential

) but in my opinion it has a much better weapon stats markup than Liquipedia!

Examples to compare:
Viking vs. Viking on SC2Pod:
- An obvious difference is the different alignment of the data. SC2Pod has one info-box per weapon, Liquipedia has a diffuse way of showing data rotationally about weapon 1 and weapon 2.
- SC2Pod markup allows to provide the names of the weapons.
- SC2Pod markup allows to provide additional information (here: 1 weapon per mode)

Void Ray vs. Void Ray on SC2Pod:
- SC2Pod has no DPS-info but I'm sure we could implement it and still have a better result than the confusing stats on Liquipedia.
- Notice that on Liquipedia the Ground AND Air Attacks and DPS stats are posted ALTHOUGH they have the same values. On SC2Pod this duplicating is not necessary because of the info "Targets: Ground, Air".

Siege Tank vs. Siege Tank on SC2Pod:
- SC2Pod info-box provides information about Splash Radius and that friendly units will be hurt.

So how about we change the Liquipedia markup for weapons to something like on SC2Pod?
I'm sure no Wiki expert, but I think thats technically possible?
Do you like the idea?

salle

Sweden5554 Posts

June 12 2012 15:24 GMT

#678

I like the idea, but it will require a bit of work, as someone would have to go over all the units attacks and add them in. But more than that first someone would either have to change the infobox (best option imho) or someone would have to make a template (either a media wiki template or just a table template to copy paste) in to which someone could enter the values.
I think at least two people have attempted to make new versions of the Unit infobox without doing so to completion. But yes it's certainly doable to incorporate this into an infobox even (or to have it as stand alone) if you have an idea for a design but don't feel comfortable doing a template you can just make the design and someone else could take over from there and turn that into a template.

If you want to look at the ideas the other's have had you can find them here.
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:ZodaSoda/UnitInfoBox
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:Kokkan
Although if you just want to change the attack portion of the infobox (say) that's also doable.

mockturtle

United States220 Posts

June 16 2012 16:25 GMT

#679

I'm terribly sorry if this has been mentioned before, but it would be great if match results in a specific tournament were organized chronologically. for example in the group stage of this:
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/GIGABYTE_ESPORTS_LAN_Invitational
one doesn't know which game was played in what order (although, some are played in tandem... even more complicated)

salle

Sweden5554 Posts

June 16 2012 20:57 GMT

#680

I know for some of us we've tried to make them chronologically, but then it requires some other way of doing things than how they are done now. But it does require some more effort, and coming to some sort of consensus if its sorted by start or sorted by time finished.