• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:36
CEST 10:36
KST 17:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20256Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced21BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 636 users

Mod Passive Aggressive Posting? - Page 23

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 All
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
November 16 2012 20:45 GMT
#441
On November 17 2012 05:40 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:36 KwarK wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:28 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:26 corumjhaelen wrote:
Report bannable posts.
Also you are a retard.

I took your advice. Now we wait. :p

I dismissed the report for this post as this entire topic is a moderation writeoff in my opinion. If you would like a second opinion though then feel free to contact any other mod (Falling was active in this topic earlier).

On an unrelated note I also saw a report for this while I was there
On November 16 2012 12:00 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:
it's a shame, that house was the bomb

and actually gave it a pass because if I moderated him for that then I'd have to hand you one for this
On November 17 2012 02:55 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 16 2012 12:00 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:
it's a shame, that house was the bomb

Oh boy, here come the puns! This will be a blast.

and then there would be no end to your complaining in this topic.
Consider yourself warned regarding that, just thought I'd give you some mod transparency there.

Why would you moderate him for that in the first place? I've seen dozens of times a string of pun jokes in a thread without warnings.

Report it next time. I just gave him a "we don't do that on tl anymore" warning because it's shitposting that used to be fun in 2006 when we were a small niche community but now the general forum is as full as it is it's nothing but noise.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
November 16 2012 20:45 GMT
#442
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

Show nested quote +
What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.

Here is the part where Kwark will tell you that mods tend to avoid moderating people/persons they are directly involved with to avoid bias.

And isn't that contradicting the part where you claim you never said people are out to get you?
Moderator
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
November 16 2012 20:46 GMT
#443
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

Show nested quote +
What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.


No, see, that's actually not what you said. You accused mods of holding a grudge, which generally implies they're out to get you. You provided absolutely no basis for the implication. The implication was refuted with fairly solid circumstantial evidence, which you had no answer for, save to try and re-make your argument to mean something entirely different than what you initially said.

Claiming to be misunderstood won't convince anyone of anything when the exact wording is pretty explicit.
jdseemoreglass
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3773 Posts
November 16 2012 20:49 GMT
#444
On November 17 2012 05:46 JingleHell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.


No, see, that's actually not what you said. You accused mods of holding a grudge, which generally implies they're out to get you. You provided absolutely no basis for the implication. The implication was refuted with fairly solid circumstantial evidence, which you had no answer for, save to try and re-make your argument to mean something entirely different than what you initially said.

Claiming to be misunderstood won't convince anyone of anything when the exact wording is pretty explicit.

Can you really see no distinction between saying "some people hold a grudge" and saying "the mods are collectively out to get me"?
"If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-16 20:53:07
November 16 2012 20:51 GMT
#445
On November 17 2012 05:49 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:46 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.


No, see, that's actually not what you said. You accused mods of holding a grudge, which generally implies they're out to get you. You provided absolutely no basis for the implication. The implication was refuted with fairly solid circumstantial evidence, which you had no answer for, save to try and re-make your argument to mean something entirely different than what you initially said.

Claiming to be misunderstood won't convince anyone of anything when the exact wording is pretty explicit.

Can you really see no distinction between saying "some people hold a grudge" and saying "the mods are collectively out to get me"?

I believe when you first raised this theory that someone was out to get you I took a look at your mod history and could not work out who it was because there was no pattern in the mods dealing with you (or indeed any recent significant action on you at all).
It was you who then clarified that it wasn't a specific mod but mods generally before dismissing the subject.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
November 16 2012 20:52 GMT
#446
On November 17 2012 05:49 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:46 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.


No, see, that's actually not what you said. You accused mods of holding a grudge, which generally implies they're out to get you. You provided absolutely no basis for the implication. The implication was refuted with fairly solid circumstantial evidence, which you had no answer for, save to try and re-make your argument to mean something entirely different than what you initially said.

Claiming to be misunderstood won't convince anyone of anything when the exact wording is pretty explicit.

Can you really see no distinction between saying "some people hold a grudge" and saying "the mods are collectively out to get me"?


When you also said...
I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


That strongly suggests a trend, and an active, or tacitly approved policy of suppressing dissent towards moderation through further moderation.

So yeah, long story short, I don't see a relevant difference between what you said and how it was characterized by others as persecution.
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
November 16 2012 20:54 GMT
#447
some people have a grudge

is fine
I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards

is the same as 'people are out to get me'
Moderator
jdseemoreglass
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3773 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-16 20:57:54
November 16 2012 20:55 GMT
#448
On November 17 2012 05:51 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2012 05:49 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:46 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:43 JingleHell wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 17 2012 05:32 Jaaaaasper wrote:
jd, due to your abl posting i am biased in your favor, but you have driven off every single person inclined ideologically to defend you, due to your insistence that mods are out to get you. You have a bad moderation history, and your reap what you sow. I would much rather side with you than some of the people attacking you, but you make it really hard.

This is the absolute last time I'm going to respond to this claim. I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable. That is precisely what you yourself are admitting, that your view of me in your mind is painting your response to my posts or arguments in an unreasonably negative fashion. I have never said there is a conspiracy or mods out to get me.


On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 14:02 KwarK wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:58 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 15 2012 13:41 xDaunt wrote:
Honestly, the politics threads are so unevenly (and sometimes horrifically) moderated that I'm rather disinclined to continue posting in them. The double standard is ridiculous.

Thanks for having the guts to admit this openly. Glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

This is website feedback, you can say pretty much whatever you like in here and not get banned. Feel free to call us godless liberals if you want.

The flipside of this is that I can be more than usually blunt in addressing your concerns, the freedom to be frank with each other goes both ways.

I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.


What do you call this?

What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.


No, see, that's actually not what you said. You accused mods of holding a grudge, which generally implies they're out to get you. You provided absolutely no basis for the implication. The implication was refuted with fairly solid circumstantial evidence, which you had no answer for, save to try and re-make your argument to mean something entirely different than what you initially said.

Claiming to be misunderstood won't convince anyone of anything when the exact wording is pretty explicit.

Can you really see no distinction between saying "some people hold a grudge" and saying "the mods are collectively out to get me"?

I believe when you first raised this theory that someone was out to get you I took a look at your mod history and could not work out who it was because there was no pattern in the mods dealing with you (or indeed any recent significant action on you at all).
It was you who then clarified that it wasn't a specific mod but mods generally before dismissing the subject.

I don't remember saying anything like that. If I did imply that in some way, I will clarify now that is certainly not the way I feel, I know that the vast majority of mods on this site are perfectly reasonable and fair.

I haven't presented any evidence, because I'm not trying to make this case here. I don't even want to discuss the issue, it is other people bringing it up again and again because they think it's fun to criticize me and call me paranoid.
"If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
November 16 2012 20:57 GMT
#449
dissociative identity disorder and paranoid schizophrenia. calling it.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
November 16 2012 21:02 GMT
#450
I'm gonna go with PBSD.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
marttorn
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Norway5211 Posts
November 16 2012 21:05 GMT
#451
I have fifteen Prussian thalers on rabies
memes are a dish best served dank
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-16 21:53:17
November 16 2012 21:12 GMT
#452
On November 15 2012 14:11 jdseemoreglass wrote:
I'm pretty sure a number of the bans I have gotten are directly related to the grudge some people have held due to a website feedback thread I made regarding double standards. I would actually advise anyone against giving their honest feedback about moderation on this site. I've seen other people receive harsher moderation too after making threads in website feedback. That's just my honest opinion, you can tell me I am wrong, but I see what people get away with around here and the things I have been banned for, and they are not consistent to say the least.

In this post you state unambiguously that one or more moderators has a grudge against you and that they have been moderating you more harshly because of it. You add that you believe that the cause of this grudge is that you challenged moderation.

My initial response to this claim was to ask who it is you feel is doing this as I couldn't work it out from a list of mod actions against you
On November 15 2012 14:16 KwarK wrote:
I took a look at your mod history. You haven't gotten a serious ban in almost a year and there is no real pattern regarding moderators taking action with you. ETT probably has the plurality of recent actions but opts to warn you. Mind if I ask who you think is persecuting you because I can't figure it out?

but rather than name the moderator or moderators who are holding this grudge you instead dismissed the entire subject. I am still entirely unsure who you think is persecuting you because I am unable to find any harsh moderation against you to try and draw a pattern from (no long bans for 10 months) and no one moderator appearing disproportionately in the warnings. It is my conclusion at this point that you are just paranoid and this grudge is in your head but you have dismissed the subject so whatever.

Then you felt the need to bring back your same grudge theory without addressing any of the issues like "why is there no harsh moderation being done to you?" and "why is there no pattern in the moderators interacting with you?" here.
On November 15 2012 16:10 jdseemoreglass wrote:
I've seen that sort of "discussion" myself. I've received ridiculous bans before, and when someone questioned them in ABL they received the stock answer "he's got history you don't know" and they are forced to be content with that. It's not a matter of calling out the mods in particular, it's about being harsher on people they don't like, for whatever reason. In my own case it started with criticism of moderation, I noticed an immediate change after that.


You reassert that the moderation done to you is ridiculous, that it is disproportionately harsh because you are not liked. This time, rather than insist it is a specific grudge held by a mod or mods, you suggest that there's a policy of being harsher on people "they don't like", a group you feel you are part of ever since you criticised moderation.

Although you assert here that you only ever made a general point about moderation and how no individual can ever be truly subjective
On November 17 2012 05:38 jdseemoreglass wrote:
I never once said that the mods were out to get me. What I said is that personal bias and emotion can come into moderation, which is undeniable.

in both of the above quotes you specifically refer to harsher moderation being done to you, and indeed explain that it is being done to you as a direct result of you criticising moderation. I therefore find this defence that you were simply talking about how humans in general are subjective creatures to be entirely unfounded within your prior statements.

It is therefore my conclusion, as evidenced by the above, that you did claim that you were being victimised, either by one or more mods holding a grudge or by the collective after you were flagged as "someone they don't like" and that you believe you have been and still are the victim on ongoing harsh moderation on account of this personal/collective grudge.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Mandini
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1717 Posts
November 16 2012 21:46 GMT
#453
See, now that's how you formulate an argument. None of this A = B because I say so, and now I'm going to refer to both A and B as B.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
November 18 2012 05:58 GMT
#454
After reading the past few pages I don't see anything useful being accomplished here. Hence, I am locking it.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Prev 1 21 22 23 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 261
ProTech63
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4140
Hyuk 4015
firebathero 1362
Hyun 883
Larva 664
Backho 152
zelot 110
Mind 87
EffOrt 81
scan(afreeca) 65
[ Show more ]
Noble 52
Free 42
sorry 41
Sacsri 22
soO 19
Bale 16
IntoTheRainbow 8
yabsab 2
NaDa 0
ZerO 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe428
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K954
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor250
Other Games
gofns5842
Happy294
SortOf148
ZerO(Twitch)1
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 13
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH316
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2183
Upcoming Events
FEL
24m
Krystianer vs sOs
SKillous vs ArT
MaNa vs Elazer
Spirit vs Gerald
Clem vs TBD
uThermal vs TBD
Reynor vs TBD
Lambo vs TBD
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5h 24m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
9h 24m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.