EPTAt some point you can't really expect people to read like 10+ pages before replying in a topic.
Too many people refuse to read. - Page 2
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Krallin
France431 Posts
At some point you can't really expect people to read like 10+ pages before replying in a topic. | ||
zDUST
Finland165 Posts
| ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:14 Chill wrote: Yes, but TL members seem to have lost the ability to be concise, so it's a two-way street. I'm not going to read seventeen 8.5 x 11 pages (on one TL page) to get to write my comment if the content could have fit in one. I think this more or less goes towards the "do we need a section where only certain people are allowed to write" - so that everybody "knew" that reading these posts would be worth his time. Personally, I don't mind reading senventeen 8.5 x 11 pages, if every last post is well written. Sadly, that's mostly not the case. | ||
|
Silent331
United States356 Posts
| ||
|
Fraidnot
United States824 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:19 zDUST wrote: maybe an agree/disagree (thumb up/down) option would make it easier to contribute without everyone feeling like they need to comment and increase the thread size and turn this site into a youtube where everything bieber related I think not! | ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:17 Fraidnot wrote: Sure but if your comment isn't long enough you get warned for spamming or not having anything valuable to say. Sometimes it takes 2 pages of text to really articulate something. I have no problem with that at all - It's great to read two pages of rich content. But some of these massive replies say the same thing 16 ways, or worse, don't actually say anything at all. | ||
|
ch4ppi
Germany802 Posts
Well, If I may make an advice. I wanna know if someone replies to my comments, but u cant because some threads just feel ridiulously fast. Maybe an "Email if beeing quoted"-Option would help... but who am I to give advice =/ | ||
|
aka_star
United Kingdom1546 Posts
| ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:14 Chill wrote: Yes, but TL members seem to have lost the ability to be concise, so it's a two-way street. I'm not going to read seventeen 8.5 x 11 pages (on one TL page) to get to write my comment if the content could have fit in one. Is this an official change in policy in what's allowed? If I didn't have to read a dozen or so pages of junk before replying to a thread, in say, General, I'd probably start posting there more again. | ||
|
HTX
Germany265 Posts
Joking aside. Besides the strategy section it seems ok overall. | ||
|
GagnarTheUnruly
United States655 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:17 Shifft wrote: I think we should call this phenomenon "Fazing", anyone agree? LOL, not sure if you're being 'meta' here... There's a phrase -- 'opinions are like assholes -- everyone has one and they all stink.' Many people seem to think that forums like these just exist to provide them with opportunities to express their opinions, so you get these megathreads with 1000 people shitting the same opinions out over and over again. If you agree that that's the role of a forum like this, then there's nothing wrong with it, but if you think that the purpose of a forum like this is to provide discussion, then that behavior ruins a lot of posts. I've learned not to reply unless I think I have something new to add, which means that I don't post much. | ||
|
kazansky
Germany931 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:21 Chill wrote: I have no problem with that at all - It's great to read two pages of rich content. But some of these massive replies say the same thing 16 ways, or worse, don't actually say anything at all. Yeah, once the discussion is well worded and argued, it's a joy to read long threads. But mostly nowadays it gets burrowed by heaps of void posts. I know this might sound cocky or arrogant and I don't want to come along that way so don't take me wrong. But as moderators, maybe you could tighten strings even harder for a while and prohibit void content posts even further then it is already done to bring the train back on the rail? | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:24 HTX wrote: Didn't read the OP but I disagree completely. Joking aside. Besides the strategy section it seems ok overall. Sadly, the strategy section should be, where quality discussions take place  | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:06 Special Endrey wrote: what can u do ? its kinda hard to read ~50 page of posts in some threads before you can post your opinion - i thought about that too - but i have no idea how to handle this aswell :| #edit - rofl  or better "omglol"I usually read until I find something that I can agree/ argue about and then go from there. Otherwise it would take days to read 90 pages of crap to find something worth discussing. | ||
|
ChickenLips
2912 Posts
This leads to even very good posts by smart people not getting read because they were posted so late. There's just so many users participating in these forums that reading a thread poses a pretty big time investment (in the time of the internet) and if you combine that with the amount of shit and stupidity floating around these forums you have yourself the problem you described in the OP. On January 12 2011 01:24 HTX wrote: Didn't read the OP but I disagree completely. Joking aside. Besides the strategy section it seems ok overall. I don't think you asided the joking when you continued with that post. | ||
|
lurked
Canada918 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:14 Chill wrote: Yes, but TL members seem to have lost the ability to be concise, so it's a two-way street. I'm not going to read seventeen 8.5 x 11 pages (on one TL page) to get to write my comment if the content could have fit in one. I totally agree with you, but then again, some thread would fill a LOT slower if most people would read the replies before posting something, and it would avoid filling 89 pages with only 3-4 arguments repeated indefinitely. | ||
|
kazansky
Germany931 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:25 sleepingdog wrote: Sadly, the strategy section should be, where quality discussions take place Yes, it makes me so sad. I haven't looked into the strategy forum since two weeks after beta start because all the good posters were flushed out by the current standard | ||
|
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
On January 12 2011 01:05 Sawamura wrote: Not many of the comments are actually relevant to the so called topic some times you know and people just browse through the wall of words to find things that actually relates to them and ignore the one's that they don't find having the same views with them. That's my take about your post though this should be made at the blog section instead of the sc2 section . gl hf . I have that happen to my topics and unfortunately it has even come to the point that some people don't read the OP at all and just want to be the first to reply. On January 12 2011 01:05 kuresuti wrote: I propose we call this phenomenon "Fazing"! Don't we have the Void ray thingie (even though it has been removed)? On January 12 2011 01:06 Special Endrey wrote: what can u do ? its kinda hard to read ~50 page of posts in some threads before you can post your opinion - i thought about that too - but i have no idea how to handle this aswell :| #edit - rofl or better "omglol"I read about every page and comment if it's newly made unless it's a LR thread. On January 12 2011 01:20 sleepingdog wrote: I think this more or less goes towards the "do we need a section where only certain people are allowed to write" - so that everybody "knew" that reading these posts would be worth his time. Personally, I don't mind reading senventeen 8.5 x 11 pages, if every last post is well written. Sadly, that's mostly not the case. I agree so many people reply and do not edit their posts at all or just skip the huge posts that they'll just say TL;DR and then miss the point those people are making. On January 12 2011 01:24 HTX wrote: Didn't read the OP but I disagree completely. Joking aside. Besides the strategy section it seems ok overall. Haha yea I am eagerly waiting when the strategy section is becoming more.... fresh? Without saying anything harsh about the people posting in them. On January 12 2011 01:25 sleepingdog wrote: Sadly, the strategy section should be, where quality discussions take place Frankly I think it's the general section  | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
|
tGFuRy
United States537 Posts
| ||
| ||
