[Photos] Walk in the park
Blogs > Abydos1 |
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
| ||
Raithed
China7077 Posts
| ||
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
| ||
rredtooth
5458 Posts
On January 14 2009 18:13 Raithed wrote: the first pic looked SOOOOOOOO fake like as if it was created with some software or something. But that made it even cooler when you realized it was real | ||
deathgod6
United States5063 Posts
On January 14 2009 18:36 nevergg wrote: Very pretty stuff - I like the colours in the second photo. Compliments from the professional photographer. :D | ||
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
Eternity241
Australia342 Posts
| ||
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
| ||
MarklarMarklar
Fiji1823 Posts
quick things done to show how imo they could have got a better composition, the snow one REALLY lacks it. could have been cut better but i certainly think they have to be cut down in some way. | ||
gEzUS
Canada371 Posts
keep shooting | ||
Luddite
United States2315 Posts
On January 14 2009 18:13 Raithed wrote: the first pic looked SOOOOOOOO fake like as if it was created with some software or something. haha yeah when i first saw these loading I thought that they were a painting or something. | ||
Physician
United States4146 Posts
| ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On January 15 2009 00:47 gEzUS wrote: over exposed snow is common for cameras in auto mode, try shooting two thirds of a stop down Good luck keep shooting That picture was actually over exposed by 1 stop to get the detail in the dark playground. I think the exposure turned out ok for that picture, you can see detail in the darker areas of the snow while still being able to see the playground. On January 14 2009 21:16 MarklarMarklar wrote: quick things done to show how imo they could have got a better composition, the snow one REALLY lacks it. could have been cut better but i certainly think they have to be cut down in some way. On second glance the first picture does seem to have too much white space at the bottom however when looking at the crop I don't like how its split 50/50 down the middle. I think the better option would have been to get more of the playground in at the top. Oh well, the sun was going down and it was getting cold out On January 14 2009 20:45 BroOd wrote: definitely feel like both of these images have been manipulated Both have been edited a little; mostly just adjusting the contrast/saturation/white balance though. Probably not much more than you're going to see in most digital photos today. Thanks for the comments and criticism everyone. | ||
d1v
Sweden868 Posts
| ||
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On January 15 2009 07:58 d1v wrote: OMG, at first I read: "[PROTOSS] A walk in the park", guess I am traumatized. Very beautiful pictures, you sure know how to photograph! What you don't see the 3 DTs in the first picture? On January 15 2009 07:59 PH wrote: What kind of a camera were you using, out of curiosity? Canon EOS 30D with a 28-80mm lens. | ||
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On January 15 2009 14:46 PH wrote: Eh? How come you got so much noise and distortion in the second photo? Especially at the top right...?? I think thats partly a result of the editing I did and also because the lens quality wasn't that great. Forgot to clean the lens first too T_T | ||
| ||