TL Mafia 5 [Game Over]

On March 17 2009 17:41 semioldguy wrote:
I don't really want to be an elected official

On March 18 2009 02:33 semioldguy wrote:


I am running because (1) I trust myself; (2) I know I'll be active; and (3) I will put in the effort to do my best if elected. Even if I might not have the highest desire to be an elected, once there I will surely have the motivation to do well in my position.

On March 18 2009 02:43 semioldguy wrote:
Also @ BWdero:
I usually enjoy being a regular Townie the most (more than a special role or being Mafia) for some reason. I still have fun with the other roles, though I really like figuring out who Mafia are a lot more than I enjoy playing as them. Though I enjoy all of it to be honest. Being elected would ensure that I am not green.

On March 18 2009 03:37 semioldguy wrote:

Yes, you are misunderstanding something. I never say that this is why I am running. I say that being elected makes sure I am not green, because it is a true statement. In fact, I state this because this is where my inner-conflict resides (something you asked about to begin with). You wanted to know why I didn't seem fully motivated to run... it's because I enjoy being green most. I am running because I don't like any of the other candidates other than BC.

If that still doesn't make sense to you, then it probably isn't ever going to. The way and reasons a person acts will not always make sense to everyone, even in hindsight.

On March 18 2009 04:28 Qatol wrote:


If you're mafia, would you really risk letting ver/ace/etc run free for several days? Established intelligent players can do a LOT of damage very quickly because their ideas are often sound and they are more likely to be believed based on previous games.

On March 18 2009 05:00 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:

Right, I think BWDero is wrong because there aren't many medics compared to people who would need to be protected. Odds are at least one veteran is a mafia (though that didn't happen last game) and won't be hit and medics will probably double up on protection before coordination so it makes sense for mafia to begin by hitting skilled, experienced players until they can narrow down some blues from vigi hit clues or behavior / slip ups / etc.

On March 19 2009 08:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Ok, I have some reading to do to get fully caught up from my working into drink fest last night.

But.

Why are people voting for mayor/sheriff choices based off day 1 clue/behaviour analysis? I know that its a good way to catch mafia on both counts, but heres the issue.

Day 1 clues will have only 2-4 clues total each insanely vague, and each to a different mafia, never more clues pointing at it. Also, chuiu typically has his clues as specific words, so using an entire sentence isn't his style bases on past games.

Next, we have barely any posting habits to follow on someones behaviour to have it exactly down at this point, it is just as hard to prove someone is mafia off the little posting done.

I understand both areas are equally important, but for day 1, neither are truely reliable.

On February 28 2009 13:46 Chuiu wrote:

In the morning a note was delivered to the Police HQ. It read

"We've killed two of your officers and if you don't find us and kill us first we will kill more. Lynch someone every day starting today. Use the experts of the town to find us before we kill you all. If you fail to lynch someone or try to evacuate the town we will set off a nuclear warhead hidden within the city killing everyone."

The mafia were playing a cruel game it seemed. That morning an announcement was made that all people would have to assist the police in gathering clues and voting on the suspected to be lynched every day. Change had come to Liquidia, and the whole world was watching to see how it would respond.

On March 19 2009 09:55 redtooth wrote:
Holy crap that turned into a straight up essay.
Sorry guys and good luck wading through all of that.

On March 19 2009 10:26 fusionsdf wrote:
About the inactives: yes, thats also a good method to lynch on. Does anyone have a list of inactives?

On March 19 2009 11:36 redtooth wrote:

i saw his retarded post somewhere. you might have spelled his name wrong or something. i definitely recall skipping over his elaborate explanation about how he was towny.

edit: no content change, just format.

On March 19 2009 11:45 redtooth wrote:

don't know who the hell ydg is but as i said in my last post i'm going to go ahead and trust babyhands for now. i really don't want pyrr elected. sorry bro but i got to do what i got to do.