II Titanic Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On November 24 2013 14:02 Pandain wrote: /in By the way, my favorite boat is the one that ravaged Northen ships in the U.S. civil wars for a while until the Northen ships were a lot better. It was an ironclad ship. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 10 2013 09:02 Alakaslam wrote: so toxic. OK. I am going to drop the persona for a minute because you all are being kind of disgruntled. You are all talking about policy lynches as if that is more important than LYNCHING SCUM. come on people. I'm doing what I can from the position I am in. Thank you. ICE! People don't like or appeiciate the persona, stop. It's disruptive as town and disruptive as scum, draws uneccesary suspicion, and clearly disturbs spag. There's no benefit to it other then your own amusement, and if you shouldn't value your own trolly fun when it disrupts the happiness of others in game. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:44 purpletrator wrote: You could at least start in alphabetical order. What if I reveal my identity? Would you change your vote to a different smurf? Was this actually a joke because if so it was a pretty bad joke. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
And then there's this post: On December 11 2013 01:58 bumatlarge wrote: Spaghetti man is pretty mafia. I'd lynch him if pandain was here. Kushmasta seems super silly. If you have to (/green) things this early that aren't questions to the host, you are playing badly. ##Vote Pandain Says this guy is likely mafia, and then still wants to lynch me. I thought this game was always about lynching who was scummy, not who is making your life harder by not posting much 24 hours in. Finally, he hasn't actually contributed anything of his own accord early on; he's only answered questions. I checked his town game in PYP, and there's a lot different in that there was a pre-phase where bans/picks were had; but still he wasn't arguing to lynch inactives or modkills(which could still happen), and he was actively contributing of his own accord. So different and scummy to me. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Voting him in the rare chance I sleep for 18 hours since I'm not using an alarm clock ##Vote: bumatlarge + Show Spoiler + I'm proud you're contributing kush. It seems good, just don't be an ass to bumatlarge(not that you were, you handled it fine) + Show Spoiler + only have followed thread on phone during certain points, so I have no strong opinions but I was fortunate enough to catch most of bum's posts so that's why I noticed him + Show Spoiler + Hope this is a fun game, try not to make a negative atmosphere guys | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:11 Holyflare wrote: K fine, not enough policy lynches happen on TL anyway. For the sanity of the members! ##Unvote ##Vote Alakaslam So you actually have scum reads and decide to ignore them for a policy lynch Nice holy | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:27 VayneAuthority wrote: I was waiting for the jabs at people going on the slam lynch. it's not scummy at all. Don't make it out to be something it isn't It's scummy as shit if you aren't clearly aggravated and have reads, actual reads, like holy has. We are 46 pages in, one guy out of 18 isn't a big deal and he's probably town Coming from someone who is often the target of policy lynches I'm surprised at your approach | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:30 Plutarch wrote: This is a scummy post. Why single out holy? and not Grack and I? Why try and paint a policy lynch as anything more than it is? This post is off. I think grack is scummier for it. You were the one who advocated for it, indicating you we're more distraught. Same for spag early on. Holy jumped on, and at least grack seemed sort of lost though he's still suspicious for it | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:31 Holyflare wrote: I'm playing so that town can have a victory at the end game, if I die (being the only person that can seemingly translate slams posts) then he is a wildcard and is a hinderence to the town win con. This is super fake reasoning to me. If we're that confused, slam can explain. And he's not that unintelligible | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:35 Grackaroni wrote: Name one time that town successfully policy lynched somebody without there being much resistance. I've never seen a policy lynch. Policy lynches are actually bad ideas. Scum dont actually outright defend someone, often. That argument is null because maybe we are resisting a poor idea. And Vayne the reason you don't get policy lynched is because people like me realize that policy lynches, no matter how rewarding to the individual, hurt town | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:40 Grackaroni wrote: Policy lynches aside Pandain, I get a different vibe from slam this game. In time to die he actually tried to make sense at the start of the game and started caring less over time. This game he wanted to make it abundantly clear from the start that he didn't give a shit about the game. It really seems quite similar to my play from last game. This is better. Can we agree holys reasoning was extremely poor? A policy lynch won't happen anyway but that's something useful that came from this | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
I read him as town from early on. Because of how abrasive he is and how that is really hard to do whem you have team members. Furthermore i believe i can get a stronger read, since it isnt that strong now and he could just be super risky, later on. Therefore, he's a bad lynch today even if a dick. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
No that happened AGES ago and he responded in cryptics. Then you apparently, according to others, argued against a slam lynch. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
| ||