Hogwarts Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 05:09 Grackaroni wrote: ##Propose Alliance: Slytherin ##Declare War: Ravenclaw ##Send Warning: Gryffindor - "you're next" Hufflepuff! Ptsh, if you think us mighty Slytherins would ally ourselves with bottomfeeders Hufflescum you've got another thing coming. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:22 raynpelikonoshi wrote: ##vote: Skanjab1s Bring it on slytherin scum State your house, challenger, and prepare to see it fall. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:24 Grackaroni wrote: You forget yourself, Hufflepuff is home to the greatest witches and wizards around. Wahahah, thats a good one! You really had me going for a while there. *Phew* Ah Grackaroni, you crack me up, I'll let you live, for now. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:41 I-be-Pro wrote: Okay I'm done with the contest. Just won it. So let's talk mafia. Anything interesting happening in your QT supersoft? This skanjab guy asked in mine wether mafia has 1 member per house. Rather scummy question to me. There's really not much to get out of that. Obviously everyone assumes so at this point but what do you expect the hosts to answer to that? Up until this point it's just a no-brainer question that might have not been a no-brainer for him. I ask that kind of questions all the time but this particular one really makes it sound like he's trying to "just post something" and look like he's participating imo. There is actually a lot to get out of that, if there was 1 scum in each house it would make it a hell of a lot easier to find the scum. If the answer had been "yes" then we'd get like, 5 conftown every scum lynch. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:52 supersoft wrote: can you give me the exact quote of his question? I tend to trust these noob-"slips"... ^_^ I'll tell you about my houseQT later, i wanna give my proposal from above (houseclaims etc.) some time. Maybe someone points out a flaw in my idea. There is no need to rush things... I'm not a noob either. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:54 supersoft wrote: OKAY WAIT I want you guys to post all the posts from your house QTs regarding this 1mafia per house theory. "I assume there would be one scum in each house?" - Skanjab1s "Not necessarily." - FirmTofu | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:48 Grackaroni wrote: 1) the voting thread wasn't even created when I posted. 2) It's not a real vote 3) Watching for players being afraid to put votes in the voting thread at the start of the game is a silly and ineffective method of scumhunting. :O I wouldn't expect a member of the loyal house of huffenough to lie! The voting thread was totes created before the game started. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:56 supersoft wrote: yes you are? you didnt read the rules before you started this game? how newbie is that? Very newbie! How do you even plan on playing this game? are you just here to chat with us a little bit? Are you just here to be a dumb troll? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 06:56 I-be-Pro wrote: The point I'm making is that it's a hosts job to answer that with no no matter what, even if that answer actually is yes. There never was a chance to get a yes out of that answer. I was actually asking the people in our house what they thought, not the host. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:01 raynpelikonoshi wrote: Skanjab1s "guis I am town because I don't know yet the compositions of each House' You know the compositions of each house, huh? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:06 I-be-Pro wrote: I actually agree with the bottom one and it's one of the things that came up in my head as well. I get that he didn't catch the no copy&paste rule. But I assume if he rolled town he at least would check on the number of mafias in the game if it's so plainly in the OP. AT LEAST when he's having ideas like that himself (his theory). When he posted it in the QT and I checked the number instantly because I was pretty sure I saw 6 mafia and wanted to confirm. I've seen this particular one happening from mafia at least once, might have been even me no idea. Well then you assume incorrectly. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:07 raynpelikonoshi wrote: 1) Do you think scumteam already knows who is in each House? 2) Do you understand why I am saying you are scum? 1) Duh 2) You are trying to make it seem as if I'm asking these questions to pretend that I don't know the answers. Calling me scum for asking what house someone is in is retarded. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:10 raynpelikonoshi wrote: Twice the right answer. New question: 1) Why are you twisting my words and pretending that I just scumslipped when you knew the purpose behind my post? I wasn't, your asking for the purpose behind the post made me realise it. When you said "guis I am town because I have no clue how many scums there are" it implied that you knew how many scum there are (and you do). So for the "guis I am town because I don't know yet the compositions of each House" it also implied that you knew who was in each house. When you asked me for the purpose I realised that it was not the case for the latter quote. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:17 Zaragon wrote: Guess we'll let the Houses trickle out to fuel discussion. There is the off-chance that scum has no one in two whole Houses, too. After my last game, I'm going to be more careful about dismissing something very unlikely prematurely. I realized something is going to be very confusing: bits of rayn's scum play looks similar to Koshi's town, and their hydra is not particularly stating who is talking (unless I missed them setting up times or something in the pregame). For an early read, them using that ambiguity I'll put down as leaning slightly scum. skanjab1s is just odd so far, somewhat scummy and/or new; any meta on him? (1) Not new. Odd in what way? (2) Your scumread on raynoshi is just because you don't know who is posting? Thats hardly a reason to think someone scum, especially since they have already stated earlier before the game started that rayn will put his name at the end of his posts. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:28 raynpelikonoshi wrote: hahahaha plz tell the thread why you are certain I am scum. Are you talking to me? Where did I call you scum at all? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:39 I-be-Pro wrote: Why do you put so much emphasis on how that's not a reason to think someone's scum instead of putting emphasis on him doing it? It's a valid point you make but the basic idea behind it is completly wrong. I'm pretty sure a lot of people have seen that and yet noone is defending him because you usually don't want to defend other people in their stead; you want to see them defend themselves unless you already know their alignment. You ARE kind of attacking Zaragon but you're making a bigger deal out of defending here. Why? I'm not making a bigger deal out of defending. I'm pointing out the flaws in Zaragon's reasoning behind him thinking that rayn is scum. How can I be making a big deal out of defending the argument of "Rayn is scum because I don't know if rayn or koshi is speaking, even though they have said so before". | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:52 I-be-Pro wrote: The first one downplays his accusation, the 2nd one downplays his accusation again, the 3rd one is defending. What I'm saying is I usually like people a lot more when they have a somewhat agressive tone to them. Mafias have a hard time picking sides and accusing people because they have to make shit up. You're lacking the balls to call him out clearly for what he does. I don't mind you pointing out the flaws if you'd use it to attack him but you're just happy stating his flaws. The fuck are you talking about? I am very clearly calling him out for what he does, and I am very clearly questioning him. Secondly, there are only two bolded points there. And obviously I'm downplaying his accusation, in the fact THAT IM POINTING OUT THE FLAWED REASONING. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:01 I-be-Pro wrote: Anyways, that's it for me, have to wake up in 7 hours again. Something that might be interesting from my QT or might just be plainly nothing: Skanjab1s asked if I am I-be-Pro (I called myself Toad in the QT... sry) - nothing wrong with this one at all, despite my recent attacks against him. snowman answered that question with a positive (trying to rephrase here...) Think he has been reading the thread and is actively lurking atm. Make of that what you want. I don't have the time to type any more tonight, sry. If you think is nothing wrong with it, then why bother posting it at all? Seems rather pointless, no? | ||
| ||