Smurf Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Let's play a game... | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
| ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
He blatantly sheeped an early case without adding anything to it and unvoted as soon as the casee responded. Since that moment he has been complaining about the difficulty of reading an all smurf game, which is the reason I've read the thread more than once, and hasn't added anything to the progression of day one discussion. For now I find H3 the scummiest player in the thread and shall, therefore, vote for him. I ask each of you to either vote with me and tell me why yo agree with me or, if you are not voting with me, tell me why you disagree. Vote:Hurndall | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
| ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On May 30 2013 19:05 Baker1986 wrote: Here's a list. Town heroes: McCoy Baker Townies: Msmith McGann Useless: TheDavison JPertwee Modkill-land: TomB4 HartnellWill Someone who thinks he's funny but he isn't, also his RP is awful PTroughton2 Scummy fuckers: Eccleston Hurndall3 Scum: DrTennant Wait, so I'm useless but my thread contribution has been to make a case on the kill it with fire/stab it in the face scum player. How do you reconcile those two opinions? DrT, you seem a little defensive, you've said you thrive in the spotlight and that helps you form reads but you don't actually have reads. You are calling PT shit and saying Mccoy's case is trash but you are not calling either scum. If you are indeed town and you 'thrive in the spotlight' I'd rather like to hear about the reads you've gotten by being the centre of attention. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
This is a game where none of us, even you, can make people listen to them based on their names so each of us should be evaluating individual cases on a merit basis and I should not have to be in thread actively pushing for it to be considered. Because I could be anyone from Grush to Syllo I expect you to look into my cases as if they come form someone worth listening to. If it wasn't my case that convinced you that H3 was scum what was it? | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
Baker, you are right. DocT is one scummy mother fucker. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
I'm the one with a minor case on H3 who didn't comment on DrT at that time. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
| ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On May 31 2013 21:56 Baker1986 wrote: JP is the hardest call in the game at the moment, probably along with eccleston. There's probably 2, if not 3 scum in this list DrT JP Eccleston PT Tom Hurn I just need to weed out the townies. of those I'd be way more interested in DrT, JP and Tom flipping than the other three. On my reread I think its unlikely Hurn is scum. His vote has been all over, his posting is bad, his play seems insane as scum since being so free to admit to not reading the posts of the player he called scummy is going to draw attention to him. I'd label him dumb, not scum. Look at this vote count from the illustrious Oatsmaster: On May 31 2013 12:20 Oatsmaster wrote: WHOS THERE? SMcCoy (0): TheDavison (0): DrTennant (7): SMcCoy, Baker1986, MSmith1, HartnellWil, A McGann, Eccleston, Hurndall3 Hurndall3 (2): PTroughton2, TheDavison PTroughton2 (3): TomB4, JPertwee, DrTennant, DrTennant is set to be lynched. Votes without ## will not be counted H3 is putting his vote in a lot of places, I do not believe a scum player would be so free with their vote and pressure so many people since they would be afraid to anger one or more of their targets who could turn the tables on them. On May 31 2013 12:47 TomB4 wrote: I can name at least two people who would make better lynches (whom I haven't already), but it's pretty pointless given that it looks to be a fruitless endeavour right now. It's better for me to sit on those reads and see how they develop without interference. Troughton is still a better lynch than DrT and he still has enough votes to be a viable candidate. He's not responded at all to any of the votes he's received. In fact, he's still done nothing at all since his first two posts. This post is incredible. Not in a good way. If you as town genuinely think this we'll have words post game. I find it much more likely however that the first sentence of this post is a lie, either a stupid gambit or a scum trying to look like they have more to contribute than they do. I don't like how TB4 is trying to defend DrT from this lynch either, his arguments for DrT being town are non-existent while his attacks on Trout seem like he fell for a modified Kenpachi trap. The role playing did not disguise Trout's motives or reads it was simply flavour. But it was odd. And scum love to attack odd things since they cannot genuinely hunt scum. For the moment ##Unvote ##Vote: TomB4 I'm curious to see what he has to say and the rest of you are getting DrT lynched already. Time for another wagon so that the day gets interesting. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
I think we should look into H3 and TB4 most, those are the guys (TB4 more so) who were trying to puh counter wagons but ended up on the DrT wagon. That seems like the most likely place for scum to be in my mind, they would want to create a counter wagon on town and yet get the credit from a scum lynch. TB4 still looks like scum to me, I don't like that no one tried to swing the lynch at all, I'd much prefer that we had a real possibility of a counter wagon to see where the votes ended up. With a tight race we'd have learned a lot more from a scum lynch. Ah well, it is what it is. McGann, I disagree, it was clear to me at least that DrT was going to be the lynch no matter what. Barely over the line is totally false. I'll write up a full case on TB4 within this night phase. In all seriousness though that shouldn't be needed, he is scum. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 01 2013 19:23 SMcCoy wrote: @ Tom I need your exact reasoning for giving JP a townread. He's the next guy I would lynch. All the noise he has been making was always an attempt to shift the lynch away from DrT, I will show it in more detail. @ TheDavison I want to know why you're not considering JP, and I would like you to comment on the points written in favor of H3 so far. Multiple players have given him townreads, myself included. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Then, I don't like how this guy joined the wagon, he has basically no other posts of value, and keeps himself the option open to switch to trout should the counterwagon gain steam: Vigi should probably shoot Trout for uselessness, although I would speculate that he's town based on current information. Nonetheless it's better if we take him out of the equation. Hartnelwill might be another viable option cause he's a lurker. I'm not not considering JP, I need to reread to see what I think of him though. Update on that in a few minutes after I see whats what. My post ten hours ago was unclear on that point because I am bad at writing things. What it was supposed to suggest was that we should look into the players actively pushing other wagons who ended up on the DrT wagon, those players were H3 and TB4 between those two I wanted to look into TB4 and not H3. As for H3, I already commented that I think he is town in an earlier post and would be unhappy with lynching him. You may remember that as the post where I tried to start a counter wagon on TB4. And yes, what I did was 100% an attempt to create a counter wagon, I wanted DrT to have reason to post and his probable scum buddies a belief that they could defend him. I don't like easy day one wagons not, like most players, because I think that means the wagon is on scum but because I think we are more likely to learn more by having a contested lynch and an easy one, even on scum, doesn't help as much as a tight run lynch. I'm reading filters now and will update with reads and reasons when I have them. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
| ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
Next up: Hwill | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
Feeling better about Hwill after that read. I'd suggest everyone go look at page 7 and 8 actually. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
For reference: + Show Spoiler [Post 1] + On June 03 2013 09:04 TheRealMcCoy wrote: Guys, GM confirmed me on my non-smurf account, but HAS NOT confirmed me on this smurf yet. I'm blurring the lines of what is acceptable as Davison appears to be the prime candidate for this lynch and almost 24hrs has expired - so there so is much work to be done to prove innocence. Apologies GM for jumping the gun. Feel free to reprimand me if you want. All: Below are the actions I plan to take over the next 24hrs. Feel free to direct questions my way between now and then. (1) Dissect the cases against Davison with my fresh perspective. Note: I can not explain the "why" of Davison. However, as I know his alignment, I can try to understand the motive and give my take on what occurred. (2) Determine a valid counter candidate to lynch Note: I know I am town - yet I also understand that heeds no meaning until I establish my innocence. Please be patient, I know everyone enjoys a passionate and robust defense. However, I do like the post count of the game currently, therefore, do not wish to break away from that. In short: I am going to start working on the two points above, and will make every effort to answer questions headed my way post-replacing. + Show Spoiler [Post 2] + On June 03 2013 10:03 TheRealMcCoy wrote: Vote 1 + Show Spoiler [A.McGann] + + Show Spoiler [Vote] + On June 02 2013 13:35 A McGann wrote: In addition to your JPertwee read that never materialised, you never came through on this full case on TB4, either. What you have written about him so far is unconvincing to say the least. He was never trying to gain credit for the Dr Tennant lynch. The first part of your original case against him boils down to "I think this sentence is untruthful, I have no way to prove it". The next part is criticizing his defence of DrTennant. If you think Tom and Dr.Tennant are both scum together, why would you not join the majority of people already lynching DrTennant. If they were both your scum reads, you should have been happy to see either one die to confirm your suspicions. Furthermore, if they're both scum as you put forward, what would splitting this lynch between two scum prove? All this does is run the risk of a no-lynch as townies tussle with two competing wagons, both of which are accurate. You are not thinking like a townie and your original case is hollow. When pressed you deliver (questionable) town reads on people not in question and avoid commenting on the contentious ones. ##Vote: TheDavison The gist of your vote to me is: "You do not like TheDavison opinion of TomB4." Rebuttle (1) Since when is activity indicative of alignment? Perhaps those "promised' cases never materialised due to the inactivity which led to him being replaced. What does this do for your vote? Have you considered TheDavison entry into the thread? + Show Spoiler + On May 30 2013 03:11 TheDavison wrote: I'd like to bring attention to H3's posting, in reading and rereading the thread I found him less than useless. He has a fair number of posts and has been involved in discussion without adding anything to said discussion. He blatantly sheeped an early case without adding anything to it and unvoted as soon as the casee responded. Since that moment he has been complaining about the difficulty of reading an all smurf game, which is the reason I've read the thread more than once, and hasn't added anything to the progression of day one discussion. For now I find H3 the scummiest player in the thread and shall, therefore, vote for him. I ask each of you to either vote with me and tell me why yo agree with me or, if you are not voting with me, tell me why you disagree. Vote:Hurndall That first post was bold, blunt and brash. A combination stereotypical of town confidence. Yet, you are willing to throw away that explicit read simply because TheDavison had differing thoughts on a player you MUST CERTAINLY think is town (i.e. TomB4). - Otherwise the chainsaw defense makes no sense to me. (2) This is most abundant when you attempt to tie scum motive to TD analysis of TB4 & Dr.T defense. Here, you present tunneled conclusions and juxtapose this mentality with the actions of TheDavison. Thus, by design, TheDavison would always become scum for you. I offer the following: Start reading TheDavison/me by face value. The Davison has been nothing but blunt, candid and open in his posts. There is no need to try and force that honesty into something else. Vote 2 TomB4. Run out of time. Will address when I get back in a couple hours. Vote 3 + Show Spoiler [HartnellWill] + + Show Spoiler [Vote] + On June 02 2013 23:54 HartnellWill wrote: I like how instead of a TomB4 case we get three posts saying "this player could have been scum but nah, I think they're townie". Otherwise McCoy said pretty much everything there is to say. ##Vote: TheDavison McCoy? So I presume we are talking about the following: + Show Spoiler [McCoy1] + On June 02 2013 19:13 SMcCoy wrote: Tom raises some good points actually, here's a tl; dr for why Davison might be a good lynch, too. Tell me what you observe. & + Show Spoiler [McCoy2] + On June 02 2013 19:51 SMcCoy wrote: I have some doubts about today's lynch though I know this much, it's not going to be Tom, but one of JP or Davis. Here's a summary of stuff Davis did:
I suggest that among the two we lynch the dude first who posts less compared to the first cycle. Other than that JP and Davis are both the best choices, with no particular order of preference, barring any new contributions that give me a better impression on one of the two. Interestingly enough, McCoy didnt lead with a vote. He asked others for observations. Please explain why you chose me over JP. Vote 4 + Show Spoiler [JPertwee] + + Show Spoiler [Vote] + On June 03 2013 05:04 JPertwee wrote: I still don't know how you guys aren't understanding this. I will make it as clear as I possibly can, and this will be the last I speak of it. DrT was a scum read of mine on day 1, that should be clear to everyone that's read the thread. However, Troughton has claimed scum in the thread, I would rather kill the 100% scum, and then go after the 70%. Especially with the linking circumstances in the thread. I am not saying Dr. Tennant took his time before going after Troughton. I am saying he hesitated. We know now that Tennant is scum. He was offered a lynch on Troughton, and it took him two posts before he was willing to go after him, even though he had put a bit of suspicion on him earlier. The whole scenario reeked of distancing from Tennant, and then the realization that there was no possible lynch that wasn't him or Troughton. If Troughton were town, there wouldn't have been that "Oh, yeah, he's scummy, but I won't vote" -> "Aw, fuck it, I'll vote him". It would've been "Oh, wow, look at this case guys. This is the real scum right here." and he would've slapped his vote down right away. The hesitancy is his desire to stay alive finally winning out and showing him that either he dies, or his scum buddy who has done nothing but claimed scum dies. It's an easy choice from that point. I see Davison being the one most likely to round out this list of scum. While it's possible there were scum on the wagon, I think at this point it's more likely that both the scum were not on the wagon. Davison fits the bill for the last member of the scum team, especially once you factor in that the scum team seemed to have had very little pull on the lynch. I'm still 100% sure that Troughton needs to be lynched for us to win, and if I had my way we'd lynch him today. From the way everyone's acting I just don't see that as a possibility today. With Troughton off the table I think Davison is without a doubt the best lynch today, and is only second to Troughton in the likelihood of being scum. ##Vote: TheDavison Technically you have recanted this vote. What is interesting with this vote is, you say TheDavison is the most likely to round out the list of scum, but you do no provide any rationale, other than "he fits the bill" and your top read Troughton is unlikely to be voted. Please explain why TD is a scum read, as for me, your insinuations are not explicit, and I would contest not even implicit. In short: The reasoning of HartnellWill and JPertwee need more explanation. They are weak votes, and explicitly demonstrate one of two mindsets. (1) Town: Lazy sheep riding the town leader bandwagon OR (2) Scum: Using the town leader vote to bandwagon a town lynch. The question is, which mindset both those players fit into. Based on the way the votes are structured, I would argue JP is scum (as he felt a need to over compensate his vote, even though it said nothing). At least HartnellWill had the confidence to bluntly say, I am sheeping SMcCoy. Over and out. MSmith1: I will address your queries when I get back. Today is busy day unfortunately. JPeterwee: Originally, you were pushing Troughton AND voted TheDavison. Now, you are pushing Troughton AND voting Ecleston. I have two questions then. (1) If Troughton is your consistent scum read. Please share again in laymans terms why you are not campaigning for his vote? (2) Please share your thoughts on Baker1986. and his love for Ace // SMcCoy. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 03 2013 14:08 A McGann wrote: Why is Baker in question? Mr McGann, I shall explain in three parts. (1) Why did I bother to consider Baker Because I don't like sycophants. As scum they easily blend in with town status quo and thus, are never held accountable. There is no shame to agree with someone else. However, Baker has taken this into the realms of hyperbole. His posting of late is nothing more than to create a SMcCoy fan club. (2) Why did I ask JP to give me an opinion on Baker Because I wanted to see how he reacted when asked to discuss something that has not received much attention. (3) But seriously, why Baker1986.. who has he pissed off? That is precisely the point. Baker1986 is a person who has bugged since since before I replaced in. Now I am in the game, I felt this was a way to inject some original thought into the thread for discussion. Perhaps he is simply a townie that loves his leader. There is no shame in that either. However I still think it is critical for him to put his cock on the block and share his *own* thoughts before being prompted to go "+1". In my opinion, this stream of thoughts can only improve towns position, not hinder. Anyways, here are some exerts of Baker1986 fanaticism. + Show Spoiler + If it is unclear. All the references to "sheep" refer to "SMcCoy". This has gone on for multiple days now. On June 01 2013 22:37 Baker1986 wrote: My man McCoy On June 02 2013 05:39 Baker1986 wrote: Also, I'm starting a McCoy fanclub. Anyone wishing to join can type in the thread: ##McCoy for President On June 02 2013 19:24 Baker1986 wrote: Do I have to, can't I just sheep you? On June 02 2013 22:02 Baker1986 wrote: I'd probably just sheep this Davison lynch too, tbh On June 03 2013 08:12 Baker1986 wrote: but why not just sheep mccoy? He's the president after all... | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 02 2013 21:16 A McGann wrote: I will admit I have not read the whole thread since replacing in. Tom, in regards to how many scum were on the Dr.Tennant wagon, I'd say a maximum of 1. The idea of both remaining scum being on Dr.Tennant (and therefore everyone not on that lynch is town) is outlandish enough that I'm willing to discount it. (i.e. my knowledge of the thread is based on my readings pre-replacement) The OP says the # of roles is not given; can you please clarify how the thread/yourself came to the discovery of 3 scum? I have played in 13 player games with 4 scum, 3 scum, 3 scum + 1 3P. I am still puzzled with what logic/knowledge such a bold statement derived from? | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 03 2013 09:32 MSmith1 wrote: @TheRealMcCoy aka TD2 I just have three questions [1]How much of the thread have you read already? I read the whole thread as an observer, kept updated and developed opinions on several characters.Not that it means anything, but I did support the Dr.T lynch. [2]Before you replaced in, were you in the Obs QT, casually obsing on your own, or not following at all? I was not in the ObsQT. As an aside, if I was, I believe that would make me ineligible to replace in. [3]If you're the real mccoy, who the fuck did Baker just appoint president? TheRealMcCoy was my way of signalling to everyone I was up to date with the thread before replacing in. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 03 2013 15:47 TheDavison wrote: I will admit I have not read the whole thread since replacing in. (i.e. my knowledge of the thread is based on my readings pre-replacement) The OP says the # of roles is not given; can you please clarify how the thread/yourself came to the discovery of 3 scum? I have played in 13 player games with 4 scum, 3 scum, 3 scum + 1 3P. I am still puzzled with what logic/knowledge such a bold statement derived from? EBWOP Please ignore that moment of stupidity. After another review of the OP, it shoes 3/3 Derridians. | ||
TheDavison
157 Posts
On June 03 2013 16:02 A McGann wrote: Mhmm. Since you've quoted that, do you agree with the statement? + Show Spoiler [Statement] + On June 02 2013 21:16 A McGann wrote: Tom, in regards to how many scum were on the Dr.Tennant wagon, I'd say a maximum of 1. The idea of both remaining scum being on Dr.Tennant (and therefore everyone not on that lynch is town) is outlandish enough that I'm willing to discount it. On June 01 2013 11:30 Oatsmaster wrote: DrTennant (8): SMcCoy, Baker1986, MSmith1, HartnellWil, A McGann, Eccleston, Hurndall3, TomB4 Yes I can agree it is indeed outlandish to entertain that notion - with one caveat. Just as reads must evolve based on thread direction; so must this heuristic. Mafia game after mafia game has proven to me that what *I* consider to be good, solid play; is not necessarily what is in the mind of other players. Regardless, I think the best course of action is to evaluate what JPertwee brings to the table with his rebuttle(s). I hope for his sake, he does not thrive in the spotlight the same way Dr.Tennant did. | ||
| ||