• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:45
CEST 03:45
KST 10:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202535Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins EWC 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 550 users

Smurf Mini Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Let's play a game...
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 29 2013 02:55 GMT
#15
Am I late?
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 29 2013 18:11 GMT
#74
I'd like to bring attention to H3's posting, in reading and rereading the thread I found him less than useless. He has a fair number of posts and has been involved in discussion without adding anything to said discussion.

He blatantly sheeped an early case without adding anything to it and unvoted as soon as the casee responded. Since that moment he has been complaining about the difficulty of reading an all smurf game, which is the reason I've read the thread more than once, and hasn't added anything to the progression of day one discussion.

For now I find H3 the scummiest player in the thread and shall, therefore, vote for him. I ask each of you to either vote with me and tell me why yo agree with me or, if you are not voting with me, tell me why you disagree.

Vote:Hurndall
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 29 2013 18:21 GMT
#76
That is indeed my first post, I have been absent from the thread until now. Upon reading the thread I found you scummy. Instead of doing anything to refute that you have instead reinforced my belief that you are an alien monster who must be purged by our security forces.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 30 2013 13:28 GMT
#113
##Vote: H3

On May 30 2013 19:05 Baker1986 wrote:
Here's a list.

Town heroes:

McCoy
Baker

Townies:

Msmith
McGann

Useless:

TheDavison
JPertwee

Modkill-land:

TomB4
HartnellWill

Someone who thinks he's funny but he isn't, also his RP is awful

PTroughton2

Scummy fuckers:

Eccleston

Kill it with fire:

Hurndall3

Scum:

DrTennant


Wait, so I'm useless but my thread contribution has been to make a case on the kill it with fire/stab it in the face scum player. How do you reconcile those two opinions?

DrT, you seem a little defensive, you've said you thrive in the spotlight and that helps you form reads but you don't actually have reads. You are calling PT shit and saying Mccoy's case is trash but you are not calling either scum. If you are indeed town and you 'thrive in the spotlight' I'd rather like to hear about the reads you've gotten by being the centre of attention.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 30 2013 13:39 GMT
#116
I shouldn't need to push it. If GM made sure that only reasonably good players got into this game making the original case and allowing other to draw their own conclusions should mean that I don't have to create the giant push onto H3 when instead I can simply show all of you why he is scum and you can decide whether to believe me or not.

This is a game where none of us, even you, can make people listen to them based on their names so each of us should be evaluating individual cases on a merit basis and I should not have to be in thread actively pushing for it to be considered. Because I could be anyone from Grush to Syllo I expect you to look into my cases as if they come form someone worth listening to.

If it wasn't my case that convinced you that H3 was scum what was it?
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 30 2013 14:54 GMT
#131
Doc, don't you feel bad for accussing someone of "maybe not reading the thread" when you yourself are clearly not reading the thread. You 'could kill him' someone else 'has a point' you couldn't be less committal if you tried.

Baker, you are right. DocT is one scummy mother fucker.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 30 2013 18:42 GMT
#145
I think you mean me, Eccelson, not PT.
I'm the one with a minor case on H3 who didn't comment on DrT at that time.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 30 2013 18:49 GMT
#147
ah, that makes more sense.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
May 31 2013 18:25 GMT
#212
On May 31 2013 21:56 Baker1986 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 31 2013 21:42 SMcCoy wrote:
Can everybody read through JPertwee and give me their chances that he's scum please?


JP is the hardest call in the game at the moment, probably along with eccleston.

There's probably 2, if not 3 scum in this list

DrT
JP
Eccleston
PT
Tom
Hurn

I just need to weed out the townies.

of those I'd be way more interested in DrT, JP and Tom flipping than the other three.

On my reread I think its unlikely Hurn is scum. His vote has been all over, his posting is bad, his play seems insane as scum since being so free to admit to not reading the posts of the player he called scummy is going to draw attention to him. I'd label him dumb, not scum. Look at this vote count from the illustrious Oatsmaster:
On May 31 2013 12:20 Oatsmaster wrote:
WHOS THERE?

SMcCoy (0): Hurndall3.
TheDavison (0): Hurndall3.
DrTennant (7): SMcCoy, Baker1986, MSmith1, HartnellWil, A McGann, Eccleston, Hurndall3
Hurndall3 (2): PTroughton2, TheDavison
PTroughton2 (3): TomB4, JPertwee, DrTennant, Hurndall3

DrTennant is set to be lynched.

Votes without ## will not be counted

H3 is putting his vote in a lot of places, I do not believe a scum player would be so free with their vote and pressure so many people since they would be afraid to anger one or more of their targets who could turn the tables on them.

On May 31 2013 12:47 TomB4 wrote:
I can name at least two people who would make better lynches (whom I haven't already), but it's pretty pointless given that it looks to be a fruitless endeavour right now. It's better for me to sit on those reads and see how they develop without interference.

Troughton is still a better lynch than DrT and he still has enough votes to be a viable candidate. He's not responded at all to any of the votes he's received. In fact, he's still done nothing at all since his first two posts.


This post is incredible. Not in a good way. If you as town genuinely think this we'll have words post game. I find it much more likely however that the first sentence of this post is a lie, either a stupid gambit or a scum trying to look like they have more to contribute than they do.

I don't like how TB4 is trying to defend DrT from this lynch either, his arguments for DrT being town are non-existent while his attacks on Trout seem like he fell for a modified Kenpachi trap. The role playing did not disguise Trout's motives or reads it was simply flavour. But it was odd. And scum love to attack odd things since they cannot genuinely hunt scum.

For the moment
##Unvote
##Vote: TomB4

I'm curious to see what he has to say and the rest of you are getting DrT lynched already. Time for another wagon so that the day gets interesting.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 01 2013 10:08 GMT
#254
I'm not scum though TT.

I think we should look into H3 and TB4 most, those are the guys (TB4 more so) who were trying to puh counter wagons but ended up on the DrT wagon. That seems like the most likely place for scum to be in my mind, they would want to create a counter wagon on town and yet get the credit from a scum lynch.

TB4 still looks like scum to me, I don't like that no one tried to swing the lynch at all, I'd much prefer that we had a real possibility of a counter wagon to see where the votes ended up. With a tight race we'd have learned a lot more from a scum lynch. Ah well, it is what it is.

McGann, I disagree, it was clear to me at least that DrT was going to be the lynch no matter what. Barely over the line is totally false.

I'll write up a full case on TB4 within this night phase. In all seriousness though that shouldn't be needed, he is scum.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 01 2013 19:25 GMT
#271
On June 01 2013 19:23 SMcCoy wrote:
@ Tom

I need your exact reasoning for giving JP a townread. He's the next guy I would lynch. All the noise he has been making was always an attempt to shift the lynch away from DrT, I will show it in more detail.

@ TheDavison

I want to know why you're not considering JP, and I would like you to comment on the points written in favor of H3 so far. Multiple players have given him townreads, myself included.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Then, I don't like how this guy joined the wagon, he has basically no other posts of value, and keeps himself the option open to switch to trout should the counterwagon gain steam:

Show nested quote +
On May 31 2013 05:00 HartnellWill wrote:
##Vote DrTennant. Other than skimming the thread, Tennant's filter is surprisingly empty of anything that would contribute to town. Mostly asking others to do work for him while he sits and waits and gets his postcount up.

And while I'm reading PT2's case right now, it wouldn't be a surprise to see both of them role scum. DrT votes him without saying another word. Sheeping the wagon that isn't him because it isn't him that will get killed if it goes through.


Vigi should probably shoot Trout for uselessness, although I would speculate that he's town based on current information. Nonetheless it's better if we take him out of the equation. Hartnelwill might be another viable option cause he's a lurker.


I'm not not considering JP, I need to reread to see what I think of him though. Update on that in a few minutes after I see whats what.

My post ten hours ago was unclear on that point because I am bad at writing things. What it was supposed to suggest was that we should look into the players actively pushing other wagons who ended up on the DrT wagon, those players were H3 and TB4 between those two I wanted to look into TB4 and not H3.

As for H3, I already commented that I think he is town in an earlier post and would be unhappy with lynching him. You may remember that as the post where I tried to start a counter wagon on TB4. And yes, what I did was 100% an attempt to create a counter wagon, I wanted DrT to have reason to post and his probable scum buddies a belief that they could defend him. I don't like easy day one wagons not, like most players, because I think that means the wagon is on scum but because I think we are more likely to learn more by having a contested lynch and an easy one, even on scum, doesn't help as much as a tight run lynch.

I'm reading filters now and will update with reads and reasons when I have them.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 01 2013 19:33 GMT
#273
PT is still a nothing, I think its unlikely he is scum with his play so far simply because there was a scum up for lynch and he did a whole lot of nothing to prevent that. His entire play has been a small bit of roleplay and a vote on H3 in the space fo four minutes. I disagree with the idea of vigging him because, well, because I think it likely he is town. I need more content from him in the next cycle but he is both a bad vig shot and a bad lynch.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 01 2013 19:34 GMT
#274
Msmith looks townie as well, his push on DrT feels right. In fact the only thing I don't like about Smith, and the reason I just read his filter, is his screaming for the flip in the twilight zone. That is an easy scum tactic to make people think that you are excited and scared for the flip as a good townie should be. On rereading him though I think he was just excited and scared for the flip like a good townie.

Next up: Hwill
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 01 2013 19:51 GMT
#275
Actually this is interesting, there was a time on page 7-8 where Trout was leading in votes four to three by my count. It was at that time when HWill came in and voted DrT bringing him to four as well. While I was feeling bad on the Hwill voting I really like his timing. I think a scum coming into the thread at that time would try to push the trout lynch and, with a few reasoned arguments could probably actually sway people.
Feeling better about Hwill after that read. I'd suggest everyone go look at page 7 and 8 actually.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 04:53 GMT
#353
GM asked me (TheRealMcCoy) to continue posting under "TheDavison"

For reference:
+ Show Spoiler [Post 1] +

On June 03 2013 09:04 TheRealMcCoy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 03 2013 08:37 GMarshal wrote:
TheDavison has been taken over by a new player

Guys, GM confirmed me on my non-smurf account, but HAS NOT confirmed me on this smurf yet.

I'm blurring the lines of what is acceptable as Davison appears to be the prime candidate for this lynch and almost 24hrs has expired - so there so is much work to be done to prove innocence.

Apologies GM for jumping the gun. Feel free to reprimand me if you want.



All: Below are the actions I plan to take over the next 24hrs.
Feel free to direct questions my way between now and then.

(1) Dissect the cases against Davison with my fresh perspective.
Note: I can not explain the "why" of Davison. However, as I know his alignment, I can try to understand the motive and give my take on what occurred.

(2) Determine a valid counter candidate to lynch
Note: I know I am town - yet I also understand that heeds no meaning until I establish my innocence.


Please be patient, I know everyone enjoys a passionate and robust defense.
However, I do like the post count of the game currently, therefore, do not wish to break away from that.

In short: I am going to start working on the two points above, and will make every effort to answer questions headed my way post-replacing.


+ Show Spoiler [Post 2] +
On June 03 2013 10:03 TheRealMcCoy wrote:
Vote 1
+ Show Spoiler [A.McGann] +
+ Show Spoiler [Vote] +
On June 02 2013 13:35 A McGann wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2013 19:08 TheDavison wrote:
I'm not scum though TT.

I think we should look into H3 and TB4 most, those are the guys (TB4 more so) who were trying to puh counter wagons but ended up on the DrT wagon. That seems like the most likely place for scum to be in my mind, they would want to create a counter wagon on town and yet get the credit from a scum lynch.

TB4 still looks like scum to me, I don't like that no one tried to swing the lynch at all, I'd much prefer that we had a real possibility of a counter wagon to see where the votes ended up. With a tight race we'd have learned a lot more from a scum lynch. Ah well, it is what it is.

McGann, I disagree, it was clear to me at least that DrT was going to be the lynch no matter what. Barely over the line is totally false.

I'll write up a full case on TB4 within this night phase. In all seriousness though that shouldn't be needed, he is scum.


In addition to your JPertwee read that never materialised, you never came through on this full case on TB4, either.

What you have written about him so far is unconvincing to say the least. He was never trying to gain credit for the Dr Tennant lynch.

Show nested quote +
On June 01 2013 03:25 TheDavison wrote:
On May 31 2013 12:47 TomB4 wrote:
I can name at least two people who would make better lynches (whom I haven't already), but it's pretty pointless given that it looks to be a fruitless endeavour right now. It's better for me to sit on those reads and see how they develop without interference.

Troughton is still a better lynch than DrT and he still has enough votes to be a viable candidate. He's not responded at all to any of the votes he's received. In fact, he's still done nothing at all since his first two posts.


This post is incredible. Not in a good way. If you as town genuinely think this we'll have words post game. I find it much more likely however that the first sentence of this post is a lie, either a stupid gambit or a scum trying to look like they have more to contribute than they do.

I don't like how TB4 is trying to defend DrT from this lynch either, his arguments for DrT being town are non-existent while his attacks on Trout seem like he fell for a modified Kenpachi trap. The role playing did not disguise Trout's motives or reads it was simply flavour. But it was odd. And scum love to attack odd things since they cannot genuinely hunt scum.

For the moment
##Unvote
##Vote: TomB4

I'm curious to see what he has to say and the rest of you are getting DrT lynched already. Time for another wagon so that the day gets interesting.


The first part of your original case against him boils down to "I think this sentence is untruthful, I have no way to prove it".

The next part is criticizing his defence of DrTennant. If you think Tom and Dr.Tennant are both scum together, why would you not join the majority of people already lynching DrTennant. If they were both your scum reads, you should have been happy to see either one die to confirm your suspicions. Furthermore, if they're both scum as you put forward, what would splitting this lynch between two scum prove? All this does is run the risk of a no-lynch as townies tussle with two competing wagons, both of which are accurate.

You are not thinking like a townie and your original case is hollow. When pressed you deliver (questionable) town reads on people not in question and avoid commenting on the contentious ones.

##Vote: TheDavison


The gist of your vote to me is:
"You do not like TheDavison opinion of TomB4."

Rebuttle
(1) Since when is activity indicative of alignment?
Perhaps those "promised' cases never materialised due to the inactivity which led to him being replaced. What does this do for your vote?

Have you considered TheDavison entry into the thread?
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 30 2013 03:11 TheDavison wrote:
I'd like to bring attention to H3's posting, in reading and rereading the thread I found him less than useless. He has a fair number of posts and has been involved in discussion without adding anything to said discussion.

He blatantly sheeped an early case without adding anything to it and unvoted as soon as the casee responded. Since that moment he has been complaining about the difficulty of reading an all smurf game, which is the reason I've read the thread more than once, and hasn't added anything to the progression of day one discussion.

For now I find H3 the scummiest player in the thread and shall, therefore, vote for him. I ask each of you to either vote with me and tell me why yo agree with me or, if you are not voting with me, tell me why you disagree.

Vote:Hurndall

That first post was bold, blunt and brash. A combination stereotypical of town confidence.

Yet, you are willing to throw away that explicit read simply because TheDavison had differing thoughts on a player you MUST CERTAINLY think is town (i.e. TomB4). - Otherwise the chainsaw defense makes no sense to me.


(2) This is most abundant when you attempt to tie scum motive to TD analysis of TB4 & Dr.T defense.

Here, you present tunneled conclusions and juxtapose this mentality with the actions of TheDavison.
Thus, by design, TheDavison would always become scum for you.

I offer the following: Start reading TheDavison/me by face value.
The Davison has been nothing but blunt, candid and open in his posts. There is no need to try and force that honesty into something else.



Vote 2
TomB4.
Run out of time.
Will address when I get back in a couple hours.


Vote 3
+ Show Spoiler [HartnellWill] +
+ Show Spoiler [Vote] +
On June 02 2013 23:54 HartnellWill wrote:
I like how instead of a TomB4 case we get three posts saying "this player could have been scum but nah, I think they're townie".

Otherwise McCoy said pretty much everything there is to say.

##Vote: TheDavison

McCoy?
So I presume we are talking about the following:
+ Show Spoiler [McCoy1] +
On June 02 2013 19:13 SMcCoy wrote:
Tom raises some good points actually, here's a tl; dr for why Davison might be a good lynch, too.

Show nested quote +

of those I'd be way more interested in DrT, JP and Tom flipping than the other three.

On my reread I think its unlikely Hurn is scum.


Show nested quote +
I think we should look into H3 and TB4 most, those are the guys (TB4 more so)

I'll write up a full case on TB4 within this night phase.


Show nested quote +
I'm not not considering JP, I need to reread to see what I think of him though. Update on that in a few minutes after I see whats what.

I'm reading filters now and will update with reads and reasons when I have them.


Tell me what you observe.

&
+ Show Spoiler [McCoy2] +
On June 02 2013 19:51 SMcCoy wrote:
I have some doubts about today's lynch though

I know this much, it's not going to be Tom, but one of JP or Davis.

Here's a summary of stuff Davis did:

  • Mentions JP for no reason as lynch choice, never posts anything else about him. When asked about it, he says he needs to reread. This shows he had no preconception of his own he could communicate to us, as to why JP is scum. Didn't deliver anything.
  • Strange flipflop on his Hurndall read. He went from arguing he's town based on his posts and votes to suspecting he's scum for joining the DrT wagon.
  • No promised case against TB4 to see yet.
  • Announced DrT as possible lynch choice, tried to start wagon on Tom before lynch, didn't help us consolidate on DrT.



I suggest that among the two we lynch the dude first who posts less compared to the first cycle. Other than that JP and Davis are both the best choices, with no particular order of preference, barring any new contributions that give me a better impression on one of the two.


Interestingly enough, McCoy didnt lead with a vote. He asked others for observations.

Please explain why you chose me over JP.


Vote 4
+ Show Spoiler [JPertwee] +
+ Show Spoiler [Vote] +

On June 03 2013 05:04 JPertwee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 03 2013 04:48 SMcCoy wrote:
JP is essentially confusing timings there.

What happened was this:

DrT asked Trout why he didn't comment on him,
Tom came in with the policy lynch request on trout,
JP dropped his case,
DrT immediately hopped on.

What JP was claiming:

That DrT took his time before hopping on the wagon after his (JP's) case was posted.

which is not true.


I still don't know how you guys aren't understanding this. I will make it as clear as I possibly can, and this will be the last I speak of it.

DrT was a scum read of mine on day 1, that should be clear to everyone that's read the thread. However, Troughton has claimed scum in the thread, I would rather kill the 100% scum, and then go after the 70%. Especially with the linking circumstances in the thread.

I am not saying Dr. Tennant took his time before going after Troughton. I am saying he hesitated. We know now that Tennant is scum. He was offered a lynch on Troughton, and it took him two posts before he was willing to go after him, even though he had put a bit of suspicion on him earlier.

The whole scenario reeked of distancing from Tennant, and then the realization that there was no possible lynch that wasn't him or Troughton. If Troughton were town, there wouldn't have been that "Oh, yeah, he's scummy, but I won't vote" -> "Aw, fuck it, I'll vote him". It would've been "Oh, wow, look at this case guys. This is the real scum right here." and he would've slapped his vote down right away.

The hesitancy is his desire to stay alive finally winning out and showing him that either he dies, or his scum buddy who has done nothing but claimed scum dies. It's an easy choice from that point.

I see Davison being the one most likely to round out this list of scum. While it's possible there were scum on the wagon, I think at this point it's more likely that both the scum were not on the wagon. Davison fits the bill for the last member of the scum team, especially once you factor in that the scum team seemed to have had very little pull on the lynch.

I'm still 100% sure that Troughton needs to be lynched for us to win, and if I had my way we'd lynch him today. From the way everyone's acting I just don't see that as a possibility today.

With Troughton off the table I think Davison is without a doubt the best lynch today, and is only second to Troughton in the likelihood of being scum.

##Vote: TheDavison

Technically you have recanted this vote.

What is interesting with this vote is, you say TheDavison is the most likely to round out the list of scum, but you do no provide any rationale, other than "he fits the bill" and your top read Troughton is unlikely to be voted.

Please explain why TD is a scum read, as for me, your insinuations are not explicit, and I would contest not even implicit.


In short:
The reasoning of HartnellWill and JPertwee need more explanation. They are weak votes, and explicitly demonstrate one of two mindsets.
(1) Town: Lazy sheep riding the town leader bandwagon
OR
(2) Scum: Using the town leader vote to bandwagon a town lynch.

The question is, which mindset both those players fit into.

Based on the way the votes are structured, I would argue JP is scum (as he felt a need to over compensate his vote, even though it said nothing).

At least HartnellWill had the confidence to bluntly say, I am sheeping SMcCoy.

Over and out.



MSmith1: I will address your queries when I get back.
Today is busy day unfortunately.

JPeterwee: Originally, you were pushing Troughton AND voted TheDavison.
Now, you are pushing Troughton AND voting Ecleston.

I have two questions then.
(1) If Troughton is your consistent scum read. Please share again in laymans terms why you are not campaigning for his vote?
(2) Please share your thoughts on Baker1986. and his love for Ace // SMcCoy.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 06:03 GMT
#357
On June 03 2013 14:08 A McGann wrote:
Why is Baker in question?

Mr McGann, I shall explain in three parts.


(1) Why did I bother to consider Baker
Because I don't like sycophants.

As scum they easily blend in with town status quo and thus, are never held accountable.

There is no shame to agree with someone else.
However, Baker has taken this into the realms of hyperbole.
His posting of late is nothing more than to create a SMcCoy fan club.


(2) Why did I ask JP to give me an opinion on Baker
Because I wanted to see how he reacted when asked to discuss something that has not received much attention.


(3) But seriously, why Baker1986.. who has he pissed off?
That is precisely the point.
Baker1986 is a person who has bugged since since before I replaced in.
Now I am in the game, I felt this was a way to inject some original thought into the thread for discussion.

Perhaps he is simply a townie that loves his leader. There is no shame in that either.
However I still think it is critical for him to put his cock on the block and share his *own* thoughts before being prompted to go "+1".
In my opinion, this stream of thoughts can only improve towns position, not hinder.


Anyways, here are some exerts of Baker1986 fanaticism.
+ Show Spoiler +
If it is unclear. All the references to "sheep" refer to "SMcCoy". This has gone on for multiple days now.
On June 01 2013 22:37 Baker1986 wrote:
My man McCoy
On June 02 2013 05:39 Baker1986 wrote:
Also, I'm starting a McCoy fanclub.

Anyone wishing to join can type in the thread:

##McCoy for President
On June 02 2013 18:29 Baker1986 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2013 16:10 TomB4 wrote:
I need to read in on Davison, but I avoided doing so on the idea that I'd be quite biased given he was attacking me. I should probably take time to remove that autotown read on him and look into it more.

Anyway I wanted to post my reads before deadline but was unfortunately away (playing paintball). No one died?

First thing I wanted to get out of the way: do we think none of the scum bussed on day 1? This is a 12 player game, there are almost certainly 3 scum. What's the most likely split for votes by scum?

I don't think it's likely that both scum bussed unless they are more active than I think they are. It certainly doesn't seem like the most active players are scum, and the only person who is suspicious at all that has posted a fair amount is JP. His vote was on PT.

On DrT the two most suspicious players are HW and Eccleston. Everyone else looks fine.

So, unless one of the scum has tricked us, there are five players (six if you count me) that we should look into.

JP
HW
Eccleston
TheDavison
Ptroughton

Someone is probably getting replaced/modkilled-for now let's assume it's PT and ignore him. If he gets replaced we will probably know his alignment (hopefully) decently well within 24 hours of his replacement coming in, assuming the replacement is reasonably active. If PT is not the one being replaced we should strongly consider killing him, since it means he is somehow active enough to stay in the game, yet has contributed nothing to town and is not active by town standards, i.e. probably scum. Thus the replacement issue should probably resolve itself.

So, going with the assumption that PT is being replaced, we look at 4:

JP
HW
Eccleston
TheDavison

I found myself agreeing with some of Davison's logic, particularly that contested lynches on day 1 are useful. However, I'm not sure why, if he was truly interested in starting a wagon, he didn't push me harder. In addition, he never swapped his vote back to DrT at the end of the day, even stranger for a townie. Even if he didn't have the motivation to push me after his initial votepost I would at the very least expect some sort of vote back to the main candidate to prevent a no-lynch. This is extended majority, not plurality. His vote was wasted, and removing two votes from the main wagon would result in no-lynch. As town he should know that.

More interesting, is the effort that Davison put into reading and posting about everyone, except JP. I don't like forming connections before flips but this one is extraordinarily out of place.

On June 02 2013 04:25 TheDavison wrote:
On June 01 2013 19:23 SMcCoy wrote:
@ Tom

I need your exact reasoning for giving JP a townread. He's the next guy I would lynch. All the noise he has been making was always an attempt to shift the lynch away from DrT, I will show it in more detail.

@ TheDavison

I want to know why you're not considering JP, and I would like you to comment on the points written in favor of H3 so far. Multiple players have given him townreads, myself included.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Then, I don't like how this guy joined the wagon, he has basically no other posts of value, and keeps himself the option open to switch to trout should the counterwagon gain steam:

On May 31 2013 05:00 HartnellWill wrote:
##Vote DrTennant. Other than skimming the thread, Tennant's filter is surprisingly empty of anything that would contribute to town. Mostly asking others to do work for him while he sits and waits and gets his postcount up.

And while I'm reading PT2's case right now, it wouldn't be a surprise to see both of them role scum. DrT votes him without saying another word. Sheeping the wagon that isn't him because it isn't him that will get killed if it goes through.


Vigi should probably shoot Trout for uselessness, although I would speculate that he's town based on current information. Nonetheless it's better if we take him out of the equation. Hartnelwill might be another viable option cause he's a lurker.


I'm not not considering JP, I need to reread to see what I think of him though. Update on that in a few minutes after I see whats what.


Note that this never happened, despite Davison staying around and posting on PT, and HW, two of the easiest people to comment on. Both of their filters are almost completely void. (there was also a post on MSmith IIRC)

In light of all of this I think it's quite likely Davison is scum.

Eccleston

Based on what I've read of Eccleston's posts I think he's probably the most likely to be town out of the entire lot. In fact, I think he's quite likely to be town. He's made very specific observations that are quite hard for scum to make. I do not, for example, think that the average TL scum player would say anything like these:

On May 31 2013 19:25 Eccleston wrote:
On May 31 2013 11:20 Hurndall3 wrote:
##unvote
##vote DrT


k I think I can sheep this DrT shit now that I read the case thoroughly.
these are the points that convinced me to sheep.
1 DrT's overdefense

2 unnatural calmness

3 repeated appeal that scum is among the inactives

4 one dimensional scumreads


Can you explain to me why you think that these points are exclusive to a scum mindset? For example, point three could be explained from a town perspective too; if DrT is a townie being tunneled, trying to shift the attention toward the lurkers is a perfectly valid thing to do if he thinks that the mafia are lurking.

Before, you dismissed his "overdefense", as brought up by MSmith1 here (it's point two in his post), saying that "2
people are searching for something to talk about early game. This is true of both town and scum." What made you change your mind?


How often do scum reference posts and actually question the logic of someone else on such a specific level? Generally scum find it hard to fake the "figuring out" process because they've already been given the alignments of everyone in the game. It's almost impossible to fake this kind of specific questioning process-if questioning is faked by scum, it's usually more general or nebulous.

On May 31 2013 03:05 Eccleston wrote:
I think lynching PT2 at this time would be unwise. He's made one post and thrown a vote on Hurndall3 for being "brief and blunt", and suddenly, ten hours later, he's a prime suspect? I think you're stretching it when you say that
Being present but not caring about scumhunting is actually much worse than simply not being present at all, because there is standing evidence that a player has at least taken the time to read and post, but still is not contributing. That's far from "null" in my opinion.
At the time of his post the thread was about three and a half pages long. It doesn't really take much effort to read that and then write a five paragraph RP post and throw a vote on someone. He could just as well be disinterested townie. I could understand it if you were pushing him as a policy lynch because you're not certain about DrT, but how he is "far from null" is beyond me. He has made one (half serious) post in the entire game. Has he been useless? Yes. Does that make him scum? No.


This post reflects Eccleston's initial thought process regarding my opinion of PT yesterday. What's interesting is not necessarily this post itself, because I think the average scum could probably reasonably fake something like this. What's most interesting are his followup posts that demonstrate that he was thinking about this. IMO most scum would not put in the effort to think about what another player has written and said about someone else because they don't have to-they don't know how to fake the process, and so they only show the results of that process. This is partly also, IMO, why scum are so reluctant to swap votes. It's hard for scum to realistically be able to fake a decision-making process when their ulterior goal is to blend in. Eccleston doesn't display any of those tendencies. He's almost certainly town IMO.

If anyone can find instances where I am wrong about what I've said above, I'd love to hear it. The only thing that could possibly be held against Eccleston, IMO, is his relatively low recent activity, but given the context of the game I do not think it is a point worthy of consideration unless his inactivity persists.

So, this leaves JP and HW.

HartnellWill has nothing. Nothing really to say on this-he could also potentially be the person for whom GM was looking for a replacement. His vote timing is not early enough to be conclusive evidence of him being town and not late enough to be conclusive evidence of him bussing either.

JP is consistent throughout his attacks on PT. The worst things against JP are:

his lack of presence at crucial times for town during the day. He wasn't around for the lynch, his vote never moved from a doomed wagon, and he acted relatively strange with respect to the flipped scum.

However, there are a couple things in his favor, particularly this little bit, which is what I was referencing when I said I found his tone to be townish.

On June 01 2013 02:02 JPertwee wrote:


You could telling me I should defending Dr. Tennant. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? I'm telling you why we should lynch Troughton first, and then Tennant tomorrow unless something comes up that clears him. I don't care to defend Tennant, if he wants to defend himself, he can. I have no interest in it. I have interest in lynching my top scum read, which is the guy who has claimed scum in the thread.


Bolded emphasis mine-this is not much but I don't think this anger is faked. Certainly he could be frustrated scum (with the lynch of his buddy perhaps) but I'm wary of that. Generally displays of frustration and use of tone like this is indicative of a townie.

The only other thing worthy of any mention is Davison's failure to provide a read on JP, but that is more reflective of Davison's alignment than JP's.

Based on what we have in the thread right now, I would say that Davison and JP are our best bets for lynches today, but I would strongly favor Davison precisely because he made a promise on reads that he didn't follow up on despite being present and following up on other reads. HW and PT have no posts and there is probably some mod intervention that is going to happen with at least one of them, and Eccleston to me looks like he is town.

+ Show Spoiler +

On June 02 2013 07:50 Baker1986 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2013 06:52 SMcCoy wrote:
Deliver some more analysis on your scumspects pls, or at least agree with what others write, you're supposed to push the lynches you claim to want you know. A lot of the stuff we're talking about isn't really relevant for tomorrow's lynch and that is displeasing.


If I was scum I probably couldn't care less if Town-Tom thought I was scum.


wat


##vote TheDavison


TL;DR
On June 02 2013 19:24 Baker1986 wrote:
Do I have to, can't I just sheep you?
On June 02 2013 22:02 Baker1986 wrote:
I'd probably just sheep this Davison lynch too, tbh
On June 03 2013 08:12 Baker1986 wrote:
but why not just sheep mccoy? He's the president after all...
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 06:47 GMT
#358
On June 02 2013 21:16 A McGann wrote:
Tom, in regards to how many scum were on the Dr.Tennant wagon, I'd say a maximum of 1. The idea of both remaining scum being on Dr.Tennant (and therefore everyone not on that lynch is town) is outlandish enough that I'm willing to discount it.
I will admit I have not read the whole thread since replacing in.
(i.e. my knowledge of the thread is based on my readings pre-replacement)

The OP says the # of roles is not given; can you please clarify how the thread/yourself came to the discovery of 3 scum?

I have played in 13 player games with 4 scum, 3 scum, 3 scum + 1 3P.
I am still puzzled with what logic/knowledge such a bold statement derived from?
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 06:57 GMT
#359
On June 03 2013 09:32 MSmith1 wrote:
@TheRealMcCoy aka TD2
I just have three questions

[1]How much of the thread have you read already?
I read the whole thread as an observer, kept updated and developed opinions on several characters.
Not that it means anything, but I did support the Dr.T lynch.

[2]Before you replaced in, were you in the Obs QT, casually obsing on your own, or not following at all?
I was not in the ObsQT.
As an aside, if I was, I believe that would make me ineligible to replace in.

[3]If you're the real mccoy, who the fuck did Baker just appoint president?
TheRealMcCoy was my way of signalling to everyone I was up to date with the thread before replacing in.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 06:58 GMT
#360
On June 03 2013 15:47 TheDavison wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2013 21:16 A McGann wrote:
Tom, in regards to how many scum were on the Dr.Tennant wagon, I'd say a maximum of 1. The idea of both remaining scum being on Dr.Tennant (and therefore everyone not on that lynch is town) is outlandish enough that I'm willing to discount it.
I will admit I have not read the whole thread since replacing in.
(i.e. my knowledge of the thread is based on my readings pre-replacement)

The OP says the # of roles is not given; can you please clarify how the thread/yourself came to the discovery of 3 scum?

I have played in 13 player games with 4 scum, 3 scum, 3 scum + 1 3P.
I am still puzzled with what logic/knowledge such a bold statement derived from?

EBWOP

Please ignore that moment of stupidity.

After another review of the OP, it shoes 3/3 Derridians.
The illusion is always one of normality.
TheDavison
Profile Joined May 2013
157 Posts
June 03 2013 07:39 GMT
#363
On June 03 2013 16:02 A McGann wrote:
Mhmm.

Since you've quoted that, do you agree with the statement?

+ Show Spoiler [Statement] +
On June 02 2013 21:16 A McGann wrote:
Tom, in regards to how many scum were on the Dr.Tennant wagon, I'd say a maximum of 1. The idea of both remaining scum being on Dr.Tennant (and therefore everyone not on that lynch is town) is outlandish enough that I'm willing to discount it.

On June 01 2013 11:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
DrTennant (8): SMcCoy, Baker1986, MSmith1, HartnellWil, A McGann, Eccleston, Hurndall3, TomB4

Yes I can agree it is indeed outlandish to entertain that notion - with one caveat.

Just as reads must evolve based on thread direction; so must this heuristic.
Mafia game after mafia game has proven to me that what *I* consider to be good, solid play; is not necessarily what is in the mind of other players.


Regardless, I think the best course of action is to evaluate what JPertwee brings to the table with his rebuttle(s).
I hope for his sake, he does not thrive in the spotlight the same way Dr.Tennant did.
The illusion is always one of normality.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 245
Nina 181
RuFF_SC2 108
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8459
Barracks 2180
ggaemo 133
Sexy 75
NaDa 51
firebathero 48
Aegong 42
Icarus 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever966
League of Legends
febbydoto10
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K398
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox718
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor172
Other Games
summit1g13327
tarik_tv12309
JimRising 459
C9.Mang0312
ViBE171
ROOTCatZ22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick899
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH176
• Hupsaiya 50
• davetesta37
• gosughost_ 15
• practicex 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 46
• Azhi_Dahaki24
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22626
Other Games
• Shiphtur112
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
8h 15m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12h 15m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
14h 15m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
1d 9h
OSC
1d 22h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.